Volume 11, Issue 4 (2023)
Health Educ Health Promot 2023, 11(4): 651-657 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Changizi M, Mohamadian H, Shojaezadeh D. Explaining the Nutritional Behavior of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes; Application of the Health Action Process Approach. Health Educ Health Promot 2023; 11 (4) :651-657
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-71139-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-71139-en.html
1- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Abadan University of Medical Science, Abadan, Iran
2- Department of Health Education & Promotion, Faculty of Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Education & Promotion, Faculty of Health, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (369 Views)
Aims: Gestational diabetes is a medical complication. This study was conducted to investigate the role of HAPA in predicting diabetes control behavior and eating style in diabetic pregnant mothers referred to the healthcare centers of Abadan University of Medical Sciences (South of Iran).
Instrument & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done on 82 subjects selected by simple random sampling in 2021. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software.
Findings: We found that 41.5% of mothers were in the age group of 21-30 years. Also, 43.9% were at the middle economic level. Among demographic variables, income was the strongest predictor of nutritional behavior (p=0.01, r=19.9, and β=-0.299). None of the model constructs alone predicted nutritional behavior in pregnant women. The HAPA model was able to predict 21% of the variance of the nutritional behavior among the subjects (p<0.001, r=0.210, and β=0.458).
Conclusion: Behavioral intention and action planning are effective in educating pregnant women to prevent and control diabetes.
Instrument & Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done on 82 subjects selected by simple random sampling in 2021. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software.
Findings: We found that 41.5% of mothers were in the age group of 21-30 years. Also, 43.9% were at the middle economic level. Among demographic variables, income was the strongest predictor of nutritional behavior (p=0.01, r=19.9, and β=-0.299). None of the model constructs alone predicted nutritional behavior in pregnant women. The HAPA model was able to predict 21% of the variance of the nutritional behavior among the subjects (p<0.001, r=0.210, and β=0.458).
Conclusion: Behavioral intention and action planning are effective in educating pregnant women to prevent and control diabetes.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Education and Health Behavior
Received: 2023/08/18 | Accepted: 2023/11/4 | Published: 2023/11/16
Received: 2023/08/18 | Accepted: 2023/11/4 | Published: 2023/11/16
References
1. Association. AD. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S13-27. [Link] [DOI:10.2337/dc18-S002]
2. IDF Diabetes Atlas. International Diabetes Federation [Internet]. Brussels: IDF Diabetes Atlas. 2021- [cited 2021]. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org. [Link]
3. Kunasegaran T, Balasubramaniam VRMT, Arasoo VT, Palanisamy UD, Ramadas A. Gestational diabetes mellitus in southeast Asia: A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3):1272. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031272]
4. Centers for disease control and prevention C. Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy [Internet]. Atlanta: CDC. 2020 Dec- [cited 2022, Dec, 30]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/gestational.html. [Link]
5. Wang H, Li N, Chivese T, Werfalli M, Sun H, Yuen L, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: estimation of global and regional gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence for 2021 by international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group's Criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109050. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109050]
6. Etminan-Bakhsh M, Tadi S, Hatami M, Darabi R. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and its associated risk factors in Boo-Ali hospital, Tehran. Galen Med J. 2020;9:e1642. [Link] [DOI:10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1642]
7. Tang C, Raat H, Yan M, Zhang Q, Li K, Jiang M, et al. Application of the health action process approach model for reducing excessive internet use behaviors among rural adolescents in China: A school-based intervention pilot study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):986-. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10999-z]
8. McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, Desoye G, Mathiesen ER, Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Disord Primers. 2019;5(1):47. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41572-019-0098-8]
9. Jiwani A, Marseille E, Lohse N, Damm P, Hod M, Kahn JG. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Results from a survey of country prevalence and practices. J Maternal Fetal Neonatal Medi. 2012;25(6):600-10. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/14767058.2011.587921]
10. Pullinger R, Goldfine Ir D, Tanyolaç S, Movsesyan I, Faynboym M, Durlach V, et al. Evidence that an HMGA1 gene variant associates with type 2 diabetes, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a Hispanic-American population. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014;12(1):25-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/met.2013.0086]
11. Wilson CA, Newham J, Rankin J, Ismail K, Simonoff E, Reynolds RM, et al. Is there an increased risk of perinatal mental disorder in women with gestational diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2020;37(4):602-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/dme.14170]
12. Imamura F, Micha R, Khatibzadeh SH, Fahimi S, Shi P, Powles J, et al. Dietary quality among men and women in 187 countries in 1990 and 2010: A systematic assessment. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(3):e132-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70381-X]
13. Norouzi A, Ghofranipour F, Heydarnia A, Tahmasebi R. Determinants of physical activity based on health promotion model (HPM) in diabetic women of Karaj diabetic institute. BPUMS. 2010;13(1):41-51. [Persian] [Link]
14. Muhaddesi H, Razavi R, Khalkhali HR, Bahadori F, Saeigharenaz M. The effect of counseling on health promotion behaviors in diabetic mothers referred to motahhari hospital of urmia at 2015. The J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2015;14(9):757-66. [Persian] [Link]
15. Schroé H, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Dyck D. Investigating when, which, and why users stop using a digital health intervention to promote an active lifestyle: Secondary analysis with a focus on health action process approach-based psychological determinants. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(1):e30583. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/30583]
16. Rohani H, Eslami AA, Raei M, Tavakoli Ghouchani H, Bidkhori M, Ghaderi A. Evaluation theory of planned behavior and complications of diabetes perceived risk in predicting dietary behavior among type 2 diabetics. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;15(1):37-44. [Persian] [Link]
17. Zhang CQ, Zhang R, Schwarzer R, Hagger MS. A meta-analysis of the health action process approach. Health Psychol. 2019;38(7):623-37. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/hea0000728]
18. Hamilton K, Smith SR, Keech JJ, Moyers SA, Hagger MS. Application of the health action process approach to social distancing behavior during COVID-19. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020;12(4):1244-69. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/aphw.12231]
19. Rohani H, Eslami AA, Ghaderi A, Jafari-Koshk T, Sadeghi E, Bidkhori M, et al. Validation and psychometric evaluation of physical activity belief scale among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An application of health action process approach. Health Promot Perspect. 2016;6(2):71-9. [Link] [DOI:10.15171/hpp.2016.13]
20. MacPhail M, Mullan B, Sharpe L, MacCann C, Todd J. Using the health action process approach to predict and improve health outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:469-79. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S68428]
21. Pinidiyapathirage J, Jayasuriya R, Cheung NW, Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy and planning strategies can improve physical activity levels in women with a recent history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Psychol Health. 2018;33(8):1062-77. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/08870446.2018.1458983]
22. Mohammadi Zeidi B, Kariman N, Kashi Z, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Alavi Majd H. Predictors of physical activity following gestational diabetes: Application of health action process approach. Nurs Open. 2020;7(4):1060-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/nop2.486]
23. Alinaghizadeh E, Javadi M, Pakpour Haji Agha A, Soleimani MA, Lesani A. Predicting factors associated with healthy eating nutritional behavior at primary school students in tehran: An application of the health action process approach (HAPA). Iran JEndocrinol Metab. 2017;19(4):252-60. [Persian] [Link]
24. Rohani H, Bidkhori M, Eslami AA, Sadeghi E, Sadeghi A. Psychological factors of healthful diet promotion among diabetics: An application of health action process approach. Electron Physician. 2018;10(4):6647-54. [Link] [DOI:10.19082/6647]
25. Rohani H, Sadeghi E, Eslami A, Raei M, Jafari-Koshki T. Predictors of physical activity among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Isfahan, 2015: Structural equation modeling approach. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:66. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_394_16]
26. Norouzi S, Moghaddam MH, Morowatisharifabad MA, Norouzi A, Jafari AR, Fallahzadeh H. Examining social-cognitive predictors of parenting skills among mothers with preschool and early elementary school-aged children. J Educ Health Promot. 2015;4:96. [Link]
27. Rahimi M, Karimi Moghadam F. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and its related risk factors using one-step method in Kermanshah, 2016. IJOGI. 2017;20(4):1-4. [Persian] [Link]
28. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP. Understanding and modeling health behavior: The multi-stage model of health behavior change. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):37-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1359105306058845]
29. Kreausukon P. Health behavior change: Using a theory-based nutrition intervention to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Berlin: Free University of Berlin; 2011. [Link]
30. Rohani H, Eslami AA, Raei M, Jafari Koshki T, Ghaderi A. Evaluation of health action process approach in explaining healthy diet among the patients with type 2 diabetes. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2015;9(7):55-64. [Link]
31. Afshar M, K horasani L. The effect of group discussion on the quality of life and HbA1C in patients with type II diabetes. J Diabetes Nurs. 2018;6(3):508-16. [Persian] [Link]
32. Karimy M, Taher M, Fayazi N, Baiati S, Rezaei E, Rahnama F. Beliefs effective on nutritional practices of pregnant women in health centers of saveh, Iran. J Educ Community Health. 2015;2(3):28-35. [Link] [DOI:10.20286/jech-02034]
33. Karl FM, Holle R, Schwettmann L, Peters A, Laxy M. Time preference, outcome expectancy, and self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:1937-45. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/PPA.S175045]
34. Zare' Shahabadi A, Ebrahimi Sadrabadi F. Impact of cognitive factors on treatment of type 2 diabetes in Yazd. Clin Psychol Stud. 2013;4(13):1-22. [Persian] [Link]
35. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach. Eur Psychologist. 2008;13(2):141-51. [Link] [DOI:10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141]
36. Gough SC, Kragh N, Ploug UJ, Hammer M. Impact of obesity and type 2 diabetes on health-related quality of life in the general population in England. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2009;2:179-84. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S7088]
37. Arefi Z, Sadeghi R, Shojaeizadeh D, Yaseri M, Shahbazi Sighaldeh S. Development and psychometric properties of the physical activity scale for pregnant women. Health Educ Health Promot. 2022;10(3):467-75. [Link]
38. Zhou G, Gan Y, Knoll N, Schwarzer R. Proactive coping moderates the dietary intention-planning-behavior path. Appetite. 2013;70:127-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2013.06.097]
39. Schwarzer R, Schüz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Luszczynska A, Scholz U. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(2):156-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02879897]
40. Kötting L, Henschel NT, Keller FM, Derksen C, Lippke S. Social-cognitive correlates of expectant mothers' safe communication behaviour: Applying an adapted HAPA model. Cogent Psychol. 2023;10(1):2173996. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23311908.2023.2173996]
41. Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56(3):161-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0024509]
42. Radtke T, Kaklamanou D, Scholz U, Hornung R, Armitage CJ. Are diet-specific compensatory health beliefs predictive of dieting intentions and behaviour?. Appetite. 2014;76:36-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.014]
43. Harada K. Effectiveness, moderators and mediators of self-regulation intervention on older adults' exercise behavior: A randomized, controlled crossover trial. Int J Behav Med. 2022:29(5):659-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12529-021-10049-3]
44. Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski S, White M, Sniehotta F. Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: A systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(3):277-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372]
45. Herzog-Petropaki N, Derksen C, Lippke S. Health behaviors and behavior change during pregnancy: Theory-based investigation of predictors and interrelations. Sexes. 2022;3(3):351-66. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/sexes3030027]
46. Scholz U, Ochsner S, Hornung R, Knoll N. Does social support really help to eat a low-fat diet? main effects and gender differences of received social support within the health action process approach. Applied Psychol Health Well-Being. 2013;5(2):270-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/aphw.12010]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |