Volume 12, Issue 4 (2024)
Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(4): 597-603 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Miraki M, Nasirzadeh M, Sayadi A, AbdolKarimi M. Effect of the Lazarus' Transactional Model-Based Intervention on Stress Control and Coping in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Health Educ Health Promot 2024; 12 (4) :597-603
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-76684-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-76684-en.html
1- “Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health” and “Student Research Committee”, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- “Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery” and “Social Determinants of Health Research Center”, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
4- “Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health” and “Geriatric Care Research Center”, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3- “Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery” and “Social Determinants of Health Research Center”, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
4- “Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health” and “Geriatric Care Research Center”, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Abstract: (261 Views)
Aims: One of the effective factors in preventing the complications of diabetes is stress management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intervention based on Lazarus’ Transactional Model on the level of stress in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 80 patients with type 2 diabetes. Stress levels, coping methods, and hemoglobin A1C were evaluated before the intervention and three months afterward. In the intervention group, five training sessions were held based on the strategies outlined in the model. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and analysis of covariance.
Findings: The perceived stress score in the intervention group decreased after the intervention. The results of the Pearson correlation test indicated a negative and significant relationship between the stress score and confrontive and optimistic coping strategies. Additionally, there was a positive and significant relationship between the stress score and methods of emotional adaptation and fatalism (p<0.001). Analysis of covariance revealed that, after adjusting for group effects, the intervention had a significant impact on the use of adaptive methods and stress levels (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Training and interventions aimed at utilizing coping approaches based on Lazarus’ Transactional Model of stress and adaptation is effective in controlling and reducing stress in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 80 patients with type 2 diabetes. Stress levels, coping methods, and hemoglobin A1C were evaluated before the intervention and three months afterward. In the intervention group, five training sessions were held based on the strategies outlined in the model. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and analysis of covariance.
Findings: The perceived stress score in the intervention group decreased after the intervention. The results of the Pearson correlation test indicated a negative and significant relationship between the stress score and confrontive and optimistic coping strategies. Additionally, there was a positive and significant relationship between the stress score and methods of emotional adaptation and fatalism (p<0.001). Analysis of covariance revealed that, after adjusting for group effects, the intervention had a significant impact on the use of adaptive methods and stress levels (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Training and interventions aimed at utilizing coping approaches based on Lazarus’ Transactional Model of stress and adaptation is effective in controlling and reducing stress in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus [MeSH], Stress, Psychological [MeSH], Adaptation, Psychological [MeSH], Problem Solving [MeSH]
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Health Promotion Approaches
Received: 2024/08/23 | Accepted: 2024/12/4 | Published: 2024/12/7
Received: 2024/08/23 | Accepted: 2024/12/4 | Published: 2024/12/7
References
1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88-98. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/nrendo.2017.151]
2. Liu J, Bai R, Chai Z, Cooper ME, Zimmet PZ, Zhang L. Low-and middle-income countries demonstrate rapid growth of type 2 diabetes: An analysis based on Global Burden of Disease 1990-2019 data. Diabetologia. 2022;65(8):1339-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00125-022-05713-6]
3. Esteghamati A, Larijani B, Aghajani MH, Ghaemi F, Kermanchi J, Shahrami A, et al. Diabetes in Iran: Prospective analysis from first nationwide diabetes report of National Program for Prevention and Control of Diabetes (NPPCD-2016). Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13461. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-13379-z]
4. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9]
5. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2017;35(1):5-26. [Link] [DOI:10.2337/cd16-0067]
6. Vidyulatha J, Pramodkumar TA, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Poongothai S, Venkatesan U, et al. Prevalence and impact of stress among individuals with type 2 diabetes attending a tertiary diabetes center in South India. J Diabetol. 2022;13(1):122-8. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jod.jod_12_22]
7. Almomani MH, Al-Tawalbeh S. Glycemic control and its relationship with diabetes self-care behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes in northern Jordan: A cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:449-65. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/PPA.S343214]
8. Ashur ST, Shah SA, Bosseri S, Fah TS, Shamsuddin K. Glycaemic control status among type 2 diabetic patients and the role of their diabetes coping behaviours: A clinic-based study in Tripoli, Libya. Libyan J Med. 2016;11(1):31086. [Link] [DOI:10.3402/ljm.v11.31086]
9. Perrin N, Davies M, Robertson N, Snoek F, Khunti K. The prevalence of diabetes‐specific emotional distress in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabet Med. 2017;34(11):1508-20. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/dme.13448]
10. Vidyulatha J, Pramodkumar TA, Pradeepa R, Poongothai S, Thenmozhi S, Venkatesan U, et al. Association of stress, depression and anxiety among individuals with microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetol. 2022;13(3):294-300. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jod.jod_85_22]
11. Kent D, Haas L, Randal D, Lin E, Thorpe CT, Boren SA, et al. Healthy coping: Issues and implications in diabetes education and care. Popul Health Manag. 2010;13(5):227-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/pop.2009.0065]
12. Shayeghian Z, Hassanabadi H, Aguilar-Vafaie ME, Amiri P, Besharat MA. A randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for type 2 diabetes management: The moderating role of coping styles. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166599. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166599]
13. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Chem: Springer Publishing Company; 1984. [Link]
14. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur J Personal. 1987;1(3):141-69. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/per.2410010304]
15. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass; 2008. [Link]
16. Thiel CE, Connelly S, Griffith JA. The influence of anger on ethical decision making: Comparison of a primary and secondary appraisal. Ethics Behav. 2011;21(5):380-403. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10508422.2011.604295]
17. Sharifabad MM, Ghaffari M, Mehrabi Y, Askari J, Zare S, Alizadeh S. Effectiveness of interventions based on lazarus and folkman transactional model on improving stress appraisal for hemodialysis patients in Tehran. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2020;31(1):150-9. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/1319-2442.279935]
18. Sanaeinasab H, Saffari M, Hashempour M, Karimi Zarchi AA, Alghamdi WA, Koenig HG. Effect of a transactional model education program on coping effectiveness in women with multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav. 2017;7(10):e00810. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/brb3.810]
19. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-96. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/2136404]
20. Nohi E, Abdolkarimi M, Rezaeian M. Quality of life and its relationship with stress and coping strategies in coronary heart disease patients. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci Health Serv. 2011;10(2):127-37. [Persian] [Link]
21. Asghari F, Sadeghi A, Aslani K, Saadat S, Khodayari H. The survey of relationship between perceived stress coping strategies and suicide ideation among students at University of Guilan, Iran. Int J Educ Res. 2013;1(11):111-8. [Link]
22. Jalowiec A. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Jalowiec coping scale, measuring client outcomes. Meas Nurs Outcomes. 1988:1287-305. [Link]
23. Saffari M, Sanaeinasab H, Hashempour M, Pakpour AH, Lovera JF, Al Shohaib S. Cultural adaptation, validity, and factor structure of the Jalowiec Coping Scale in Iranian women with multiple sclerosis: Which coping strategies are most common and effective?. Int J MS Care. 2017;19(4):209-16. [Link] [DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2016-042]
24. Siddharthan GM, Reddy MM, Sunil BN. "Perceived stress" and its associated factors among diabetic patients receiving care from a rural tertiary health care center in South India. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:11. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_388_20]
25. Mehdikhani S, Gohari MR, Banazade Z. Determining factors affecting fasting blood sugar in patients with type 2 diabetes using Copula functions. Razi J Med Sci. 2014;21(5):1-8. [Persian] [Link]
26. Rubin RR, Peyrot M, Siminerio LM. Health care and patient-reported outcomes: Results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1249-55. [Link] [DOI:10.2337/dc05-2494]
27. Alipour A, Zare H, Poursharifi H, Sheibani KA, Ardekani MA. The intermediary role of self-efficacy in relation with stress, glycosylated haemoglobin and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes. Iran J Public Health. 2012;41(12):76-80. [Link]
28. Hamadzadeh S, Ezatti Z, Abedsaeidi Z, Nasiri N. Coping styles and self-care behaviors among diabetic patients. Iran J Nurs. 2013;25(80):24-33. [Persian] [Link]
29. Asa GA, Fauk NK, Ward PR, Hawke K, Crutzen R, Mwanri L. Psychological, sociocultural and economic coping strategies of mothers or female caregivers of children with a disability in Belu district, Indonesia. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251274. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251274]
30. Soponaru C, Bojian A, Iorga M. Stress, coping mechanisms and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Arch Med Sci Civiliz Dis. 2016;1(1):16-23. [Link] [DOI:10.5114/amscd.2016.59601]
31. Carver CS, Connor-Smith J. Personality and coping. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:679-704. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352]
32. Kleiber DA, Hutchinson SL, Williams R. Leisure as a resource in transcending negative life events: Self-protection, self-restoration, and personal transformation. Leis Sci. 2002;24(2):219-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01490400252900167]
33. Murakami H, Yasui‐Furukori N, Otaka H, Nakayama H, Murabayashi M, Mizushiri S, et al. Coping styles associated with glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2020;11(5):1215-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jdi.13225]
34. Zamani-Alavijeh F, Araban M, Koohestani HR, Karimy M. The effectiveness of stress management training on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:39. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13098-018-0342-5]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |