Volume 11, Issue 5 (2023)
Health Educ Health Promot 2023, 11(5): 733-742 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mardalena I, Wahyuni H, Wastutiningsih S. Stakeholders’ Communication of COVID-19 Pandemic in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Health Educ Health Promot 2023; 11 (5) :733-742
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-73741-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-73741-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, Health Polytechnic Ministry of Health Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2- Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2- Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract: (1049 Views)
Aims: The objective of this study was to explore the coordination and communication governance processes utilized by the Yogyakarta provincial government in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants & Methods: Qualitative research with a phenomenological approach was performed with a total of 7 informants from various stakeholders, including government institutions, professional organizations, and task forces collaborating with the Yogyakarta Provincial Health Office to address the challenges posed by COVID-19 in the region. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and observations. The data were analyzed by Colaizzi’s method.
Findings: Two primary themes were produced, including, 1) training and development of human resources for the management of the crisis, with two sub-themes emerging, including, a) the healthcare stage in handling and b) recruitment in human resources fulfillment, and 2) the communication governance of the Yogyakarta Special Region's government, with four key themes, including, a) effective information through easily accessible applications, b) comprehensive information from reliable sources, c) diverse media for socialization meetings during coordination, and d) dissemination of recommendations.
Conclusion: An effective response to the pandemic hinged on a cooperative strategy that brought together diverse stakeholders, such as government entities, healthcare organizations, and community leaders.
Participants & Methods: Qualitative research with a phenomenological approach was performed with a total of 7 informants from various stakeholders, including government institutions, professional organizations, and task forces collaborating with the Yogyakarta Provincial Health Office to address the challenges posed by COVID-19 in the region. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and observations. The data were analyzed by Colaizzi’s method.
Findings: Two primary themes were produced, including, 1) training and development of human resources for the management of the crisis, with two sub-themes emerging, including, a) the healthcare stage in handling and b) recruitment in human resources fulfillment, and 2) the communication governance of the Yogyakarta Special Region's government, with four key themes, including, a) effective information through easily accessible applications, b) comprehensive information from reliable sources, c) diverse media for socialization meetings during coordination, and d) dissemination of recommendations.
Conclusion: An effective response to the pandemic hinged on a cooperative strategy that brought together diverse stakeholders, such as government entities, healthcare organizations, and community leaders.
Keywords: Coordination [MeSH], Communication [MeSH], COVID-19 [MeSH], Indonesia [MeSH], Phenomenology [MeSH], Stakeholder [MeSH]
Article Type: Qualitative Research |
Subject:
Health Promotion Approaches
Received: 2024/02/6 | Accepted: 2024/04/4 | Published: 2024/05/15
Received: 2024/02/6 | Accepted: 2024/04/4 | Published: 2024/05/15
References
1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Weekly epidemiological update [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/ [Link]
2. Gugus Tugas COVID-19. Gugus tugas percepatan penanganan COVID-19; 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 17]. Available from: https://covid19.go.id/ [Indonesian] [Link]
3. Wahyuni HI, Ambardi K, Winanti PS, Mas'udi W. The problem of infodemic in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy Brief. 2020;3. [Indonesian] [Link]
4. World Health Organization. International health regulations (2005). 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. [Link]
5. Noor F, Ayuningtyas F, Prihatiningsih W. Disaster communications for handling coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Indonesia. Int J Multicult Multirelig Underst. 2020;7(4):25-35. [Link]
6. Kim DKD, Kreps GL. An analysis of government communication in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Recommendations for effective government health risk communication. World Med Health Policy. 2020;12(4):398-412. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/wmh3.363]
7. Zhang L, Li H, Chen K. Effective risk communication for public health emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) outbreak in Wuhan, China. Healthcare. 2020;8(1):64. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/healthcare8010064]
8. Sari MI. South Korea's policy in flattening the COVID-19 curve without lockdown: A lesson learned. The Habibie Cent. 2020;15. [Indonesian] [Link]
9. Christensen T, Lægreid P. Balancing governance capacity and legitimacy: How the Norwegian government handled the COVID‐19 crisis as a high performer. Public Adm Rev. 2020;80(5):774-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/puar.13241]
10. Ghani AC, Donnelly CA, Cox DR, Griffin JT, Fraser C, Lam TH, et al. Methods for estimating the case fatality ratio for a novel, emerging infectious disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(5):479-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwi230]
11. Ko K, Sakuwa K, Suzuki K, Poocharoen O, Nguyen T, Henderson S, et al. International comparative analysis of COVID-19 responses. Sejong-si: KDI School of Public Policy and Management; 2021. [Link]
12. Sin MSY. Masking fears: SARS and the politics of public health in China. Crit Public Health. 2016;26(1):88-98. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09581596.2014.923815]
13. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 1994. [Link]
14. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1978. [Link]
15. Mufti M, Sahid Gatara A, Afrilia A, Mutiarawati R. Analysis of measuring public trust in the government: Strength for community-based COVID-19 handling. LP2M; 2020. [Indonesian] [Link]
16. Johnson J, Howard K, Wilson A, Ward M, Gilbert GL, Degeling C. Public preferences for one health approaches to emerging infectious diseases: A discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2019;228:164-71. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.013]
17. El Zowalaty ME, Järhult JD. From SARS to COVID-19: A previously unknown SARS-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) of pandemic potential infecting humans-Call for a One Health approach. One Health. 2020;9:100124. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100124]
18. Okada P, Buathong R, Phuygun S, Thanadachakul T, Parnmen S, Wongboot W, et al. Early transmission patterns of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in travellers from Wuhan to Thailand, January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(8):2000097. [Link] [DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.8.2000097]
19. Djalante R, Lassa J, Setiamarga D, Sudjatma A, Indrawan M, Haryanto B, et al. Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020. Prog Disaster Sci. 2020;6:100091. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100091]
20. Brinkerhoff DW, Brinkerhoff JM. Governance reforms and failed states: Challenges and implications. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2002;68(4):511-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0020852302684002]
21. Rohman S. Coordination between sub-district heads and village heads in infrastructure development in Wanasari village, Muara Wahau sub-district, Kutai Timur district. eJournal PIN. 2017;5(3):437-47. [Indonesian] [Link]
22. Wang Y, Hao H, Platt LS. Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on Twitter. Comput Hum Behav. 2021;114:106568. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106568]
23. Tangcharoensathien V, Calleja N, Nguyen T, Purnat T, D'Agostino M, Garcia-Saiso S, et al. Framework for managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19659. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/19659]
24. Buana DR. Analysis of Indonesian community behavior in facing the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and tips for maintaining mental well-being. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i. 2020;7(3). [Indonesian] [Link]
25. Malakyan PG. Followership in leadership studies: A case of leader-follower trade approach. J Leadersh Stud. 2014;7(4):6-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/jls.21306]
26. Falah AI, Kutanegara PM, Hadna AH. Cultural and religious approaches in handling the COVID-19 pandemic in Bali and Central Java. Jurnal SMaRT. 2022;8(2):245-59. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.18784/smart.v8i2.1695]
27. Rasul G. A framework for improving policy priorities in managing COVID-19 challenges in developing countries. Front Public Health. 2020;8:589681. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.589681]
28. Boholm Å. Risk communication as government agency organizational practice. Risk Anal. 2019;39(8):1695-707. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/risa.13302]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |