Volume 11, Issue 2 (2023)
Health Educ Health Promot 2023, 11(2): 189-194 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Baihaqi B, Hidayah A, Rujito L. Awareness of Non-Health Students about Premarital Genetic Screening; A Study in Indonesia. Health Educ Health Promot 2023; 11 (2) :189-194
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-67348-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-67348-en.html
1- Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia
Abstract: (1263 Views)
Aims: Premarital screening is a procedure to assess health status before entering the marital stage. In Indonesia, this examination has not been fully optimized for controlling catastrophic diseases, including genetic diseases. This study aimed to determine the relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward premarital genetic screening in non-medical and health students.
Instruments & Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 400 non-healthcare students from the southern region of Central Java, who were selected using a simple random sampling method. The knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward premarital genetic screening were measured using questionnaires. The chi-square test was used to look for relationships between variables.
Findings: The knowledge level in 55.5% of respondents was sufficient, in 42.5% was poor, and in 2% was good. Most respondents (57.3%) had a positive attitude. The majority of the respondents exhibited a positive attitude toward all indicators, except for actively seeking information. 355 respondents (88.75%) displayed positive behavior toward premarital genetic screening, while the 45 respondents (11.25%) exhibited negative behavior. There was no significant relationship between knowledge with attitude and behavior (p>0.05), but a significant relationship was observed between attitude and behavior (p=0.021).
Conclusion: There is no relationship between knowledge and attitude. However, the study found a relationship between attitudes and behaviors toward premarital and genetic screening in non-health students.
Instruments & Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 400 non-healthcare students from the southern region of Central Java, who were selected using a simple random sampling method. The knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward premarital genetic screening were measured using questionnaires. The chi-square test was used to look for relationships between variables.
Findings: The knowledge level in 55.5% of respondents was sufficient, in 42.5% was poor, and in 2% was good. Most respondents (57.3%) had a positive attitude. The majority of the respondents exhibited a positive attitude toward all indicators, except for actively seeking information. 355 respondents (88.75%) displayed positive behavior toward premarital genetic screening, while the 45 respondents (11.25%) exhibited negative behavior. There was no significant relationship between knowledge with attitude and behavior (p>0.05), but a significant relationship was observed between attitude and behavior (p=0.021).
Conclusion: There is no relationship between knowledge and attitude. However, the study found a relationship between attitudes and behaviors toward premarital and genetic screening in non-health students.
Keywords: Premarital Examinations [MeSH], Screening [MeSH], Genetic Screening [MeSH], Medicine [MeSH], Medical Student [MeSH]
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Education and Health Behavior
Received: 2023/02/7 | Accepted: 2023/03/9 | Published: 2023/05/22
Received: 2023/02/7 | Accepted: 2023/03/9 | Published: 2023/05/22
References
1. Idaiani S, Riyadi E. Sistem Kesehatan Jiwa di Indonesia: Tantangan untuk Memenuhi Kebutuhan. J Penelit dan Pengemb Pelayanan Kesehat. 2018;2(2 SE). [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.22435/jpppk.v2i2.134]
2. Widari S, Bachtiar N, Primayesa E. Faktor Penentu Stunting: Analisis Komparasi Masa Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) dan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di Indonesia. J Ilm Univ Batanghari Jambi. 2021;21(3):24. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.33087/jiubj.v21i3.1726]
3. Nawawi K, Lestari DW, Rujito L. Distribusi Pandangan Masyarakat Umum Terhadap Skrining Premarital di Banyumas. Mandala Heal. 2022;15(1):17-29. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.20884/1.mandala.2022.15.1.5743]
4. Rujito L, Mulyanto J. Adopting mass thalassemia prevention program in indonesia: a proposal. J Kedokt dan Kesehat Indones. 2019;10(1):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.20885/JKKI.Vol10.Iss1.art1]
5. Alkalbani A, Alharrasi M, Achura S, Al Badi A, Al Rumhi A, Alqassabi K, et al. Factors Affecting the willingness to undertake premarital screening test among prospective marital individuals. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8:23779608221078156. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/23779608221078156]
6. Hiebert L, Hecht R, Soe-Lin S, Mohamed R, Shabaruddin FH, Syed Mansor SM, et al. A stepwise approach to a national hepatitis c screening strategy in Malaysia to meet the WHO 2030 targets: proposed strategy, coverage, and costs. Value Heal Reg issues. 2019;18:112-20. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2018.12.005]
7. Angastiniotis M, Petrou M, Loukopoulos D, Modell B, Farmakis D, Englezos P, et al. The prevention of thalassemia revisited: a historical and ethical perspective by the thalassemia international federation. Hemoglobin. 2021;45(1):5-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/03630269.2021.1872612]
8. Hamed EM, Eshra DM, Qasem E, Khalil AK. Knowledge, perception, and attitude of future couples towards premarital screening. Menoufia Nurs J. 2022;7(2):1-21. [Link] [DOI:10.21608/menj.2022.254007]
9. Memish ZA, Saeedi MY. Six-year outcome of the national premarital screening and genetic counseling program for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31(3):229-35. [Link] [DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2011.229]
10. Haga SB, Kim E, Myers RA, Ginsburg GS. Primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and experience with personal genetic testing. J Pers Med. 2019;9(2):29. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/jpm9020029]
11. Alkhaldi SM, Khatatbeh MM, Berggren VEM, Taha HA. Knowledge and attitudes toward mandatory premarital screening among university students in North Jordan. Hemoglobin. 2016;40(2):118-24. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/03630269.2015.1135159]
12. Keandre N, Rujito L, Munfiah S. Knowledge, attitude, and behavior in genetic and premarital screening among medical and health students in Banyumas Regency. Med Heal J. 2021;1(1):22-31. [Link] [DOI:10.20884/1.mhj.2021.1.1.4670]
13. Khdair SI, Al-Qerem W, Jarrar W. Knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing among Jordanians: An approach towards genomic medicine. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(7):3989-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.004]
14. Abrams LR, McBride CM, Hooker GW, Cappella JN, Koehly LM. The many facets of genetic literacy: assessing the scalability of multiple measures for broad use in survey research. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141532. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0141532]
15. Rahma AT, Elsheik M, Elbarazi I, Ali BR, Patrinos GP, Kazim MA, et al. Knowledge and attitudes of medical and health science students in the United Arab Emirates toward genomic medicine and pharmacogenomics: a cross-sectional study. J Pers Med. 2020;10(4):191. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/jpm10040191]
16. Horton B, Bridle H, Alexander CL, Katzer F. Giardia duodenalis in the UK: current knowledge of risk factors and public health implications. Parasitology. 2019;146(4):413-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0031182018001683]
17. Yli-Panula E, Jeronen E, Lemmetty P, Pauna A. Teaching methods in biology promoting biodiversity education. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):3812. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su10103812]
18. Tognetto A, Michelazzo MB, Ricciardi W, Federici A, Boccia S. Core competencies in genetics for healthcare professionals: results from a literature review and a Delphi method. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):19. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1456-7]
19. Ezechi NG. The problems of teaching and learning genetics in secondary schools in Enugu South local government area of Enugu State. Br Int J Educ Soc Sci. 2021;8(4 SE):13-9. [Link]
20. World Atlas. List of countries by literacy rate [Internet]. World Atlas; 2022 [cited 2022 July 21]. Available from: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-highest-literacy-rates-in-the-world.html [Link]
21. Tahmidaten L, Krismanto W. Permasalahan Budaya Membaca di Indonesia (Studi Pustaka Tentang Problematika & Solusinya). J Pendidik dan Kebud. 2020;10(1):22-33. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.24246/j.js.2020.v10.i1.p22-33]
22. Akbar A. Membudayakan Literasi Dengan Program 6M di Sekolah Dasar. J Pendidik Sekol Dasar. 2017;3(1):42. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.30870/jpsd.v3i1.1093]
23. Boardman FK, Clark C, Jungkurth E, Young PJ. Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK. J Genet Couns. 2020;29(6):1026-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1231]
24. Jaka P De, Lestari DW, Rujito L. Perception of prospective couples in Banyumas towards thalassemia screening: a qualitative study. Bul Penelit Kesehat. 2019;47(2 SE). [Link] [DOI:10.22435/bpk.v47i2.1261]
25. Di Mattei VE, Carnelli L, Bernardi M, Bienati R, Brombin C, Cugnata F, et al. Coping mechanisms, psychological distress, and quality of life prior to cancer genetic counseling. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1218. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01218]
26. Saylor KW, Ekunwe L, Antoine-LaVigne D, Sellers DE, McGraw S, Levy D, et al. Attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing among participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019;14(3):262-73. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1556264619844851]
27. Cheung R, Jolly S, Vimal M, Kim HL, McGonigle I. Who's afraid of genetic tests?: An assessment of Singapore's public attitudes and changes in attitudes after taking a genetic test. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23(1):5. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12910-022-00744-5]
28. Kim H, Ho CWL, Ho CH, Athira PS, Kato K, De Castro L, et al. Genetic discrimination: introducing the Asian perspective to the debate. NPJ Genomic Med. 2021;6(1):54. [Link] [DOI:10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4]
29. Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28(15):1429-64. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x]
30. Bener A, Al-Mulla M, Clarke A. Premarital screening and genetic counseling program: Studies from an Endogamous Population. Int J Appl basic Med Res. 2019;9(1):20-6. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_42_18]
31. Zhong A, Darren B, Dimaras H. Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):140. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0535-2]
32. Nurhendriyana H, Brajadenta GS. Pengembangan Layanan Diagnosis Genomics di Bidang Kesehatan Reproduksi. Tunas Med J Kedokt Kesehat. 2019;5(2):6-8. [Indonesian] [Link]
33. Botoseneanu A, Alexander JA, Banaszak-Holl J. To test or not to test? The role of attitudes, knowledge, and religious involvement among U.S. adults on intent-to-obtain adult genetic testing. Health Educ Behav. 2011;38(6):617-28. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1090198110389711]
34. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2(4):314-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/hbe2.195]
35. Reed-Weston AE, Espinal A, Hasar B, Chiuzan C, Lazarin G, Weng C, et al. Choices, attitudes, and experiences of genetic screening in Latino/a and Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. J Community Genet. 2020;11(4):391-403. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12687-020-00464-6]
36. Luthfiyana NU, Putri SI, Halu SAN. Perilaku Mahasiswa Kesehatan dalam Memberikan Edukasi Pencegahan COVID-19 kepada Masyarakat. Wind Health. 2022;5(2):501-10. [Indonesian] [Link] [DOI:10.33096/woh.v5i02.10]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |