Volume 10, Issue 4 (2022)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(4): 695-701 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Al-Khafaji A. Microbial Contamination from Mobile Phones of Social Groups at Kufa Technical Institute and Efficiency of Two Disinfections to its Reduction. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (4) :695-701
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-59557-en.html
Kufa Technical Institute, Alfurat Alawsat Technical University, 31001 Alkufa Alnajaf, Iraq
Abstract:   (764 Views)
Aims: Mobile phones, which are one of the most essential tools in social and professional life, are rarely disinfected. So, these devices may become contaminated with a variety of bacterial organisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate bacterial contamination and identify all bacterial isolates of mobile phones related to social groups in Kufa Technical Institute and to determine the efficiency of two disinfectants prepared on bacterial species.
Materials & Methods: Fifty-one swab samples of mobile phones were randomly collected from different people in the social groups of Kufa Technical Institute and cultured on selective and enrichment media and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Then, the isolated bacteria were identified by gram staining and biochemical tests and confirmed using Vitek 2. Next, two disinfectants were prepared and their inhibitory activity against microbes compared to ethanol alcohol-70% was investigated.
Findings: Ten bacterial species were isolated and identified from mobile phones, which included Staphylococcus aureus (49%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (12%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (6%), Escherichia vulner (6%), Escherichia coli (4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (4%), Bacillus sp (4%), Pantoea spp (2%), and Cronobacter C sakazakii (2%). Microbial growth was also reduced by the use of disinfectants, the first disinfectant showed a higher inhibitory effect compared to the second disinfectant, while the control disinfectant (ethanol-70%) had no effect on all tested bacteria.
Conclusion: Bacteria colonize cell phones in social groups. Using disinfectants reduces bacterial contamination on the surface of the mobile phone.
 
Full-Text [PDF 961 kb]   (794 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (123 Views)  
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Technology of Health Education
Received: 2022/02/13 | Accepted: 2022/10/2 | Published: 2022/10/17
* Corresponding Author Address: Kufa Technical Institute, Alfurat Alawsat Technical University, 31001 Alkufa Alnajaf, Iraq. (kin.angh22@atu.edu.iq)

References
1. Elkholy M, Ewees I. Mobile (cellular) phone contamination with nosocomial pathogens in Intensive Care Units. Med J Cairo Univ. 2010;78(2):1-5. [Link]
2. Al-Ghamdi AK, Abdelmalek SMA, Ashshi AM, Faidah H, Shukri H, Jiman-Fatani AA. Bacterial contamination of computer keyboards and mice, elevator buttons, and shopping cards. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5(23):3998-4003. [Link] [DOI:10.5897/AJMR11.770]
3. Bodena D, Teklemariam Z, Balakrishnan S, Tesfa T. Bacterial contamination of mobile phones of health professionals in eastern Ethiopia: antimicrobial susceptibility and associated factors. Trop Med Health. 2019;47:15. [Linkvv] [DOI:10.1186/s41182-019-0144-y]
4. Srivastava TS, Waghmare LS, Jagzape AT, Rawekar, AT, Quazi NZ, Mishra VP. Role of information communication technology in higher education: Learners perspective in rural medical schools. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):XC01-6. [Link] [DOI:10.7860/JCDR/2014/8371.4448]
5. Stryjak J, Sivakumaran M. The mobile economy 2019 [Internet]. GSMA Intelligence; 2019 [Cited 2022 May 23]. Available from: https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/2019/02/the-mobile-economy-2019/731/ [Link]
6. Zhao B, Dewald C, Hennig M, Bossert J, Bauer M, Pletz, MW. Microorganisms @ materials surfaces in aircraft: potential risks for public health? - A systematic review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019;28:6-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.07.011]
7. Banawas S, Abdel-Hadi A, Alaidarous M, Alshehri B, Bin Dukhyil AA, et al. Multidrug-resistant bacteria associated with cell phones of healthcare professionals in selected hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 218;2018:6598918. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2018/6598918]
8. Bhardwaj N, Khatri M, Bhardwaj SK, Sonne C, Deep A, Kim KH. A review on mobile phones as bacterial reservoirs in healthcare environments and potential device decontamination approaches. Environ Res. 2020;186:109569. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109569]
9. Stephens B, Azimi P, Thoemmes MS, Heidarinejad M, Allen JG, Gilbert JA. Microbial exchange via fomites and implications for human health. Curr Pollut Rep. 2019;5(4):198-213. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40726-019-00123-6]
10. Ovca A, Rednak B, Torkar K, Jevšnik M, Bauer M. Students' mobile phones - how clean are they? Int J Sanitary Engin Res. 2012;6(1):6-18. [Link]
11. Ibrahim TA, Akenroye OM, Opawale BO, Osabiya OJ. Isolation and identification of bacterial pathogens from mobile phones of volunteered technologists in Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State. J Microbiol Biotech. 2013;3(1):37‐40. [Link] [DOI:10.15580/GJSETR.2013.6.100912104]
12. Patricia T, editor. Bailey & Scott's diagnostic microbiology, 13th Edition. London: Elsevier Health Sciences, Mosby; 2013. [Link]
13. Ulger F, Esen S, Dilek A, Yanik K, Gunaydin M, Leblebicioglu H. Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8(1):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1476-0711-8-7]
14. Lee YJ, Yoo CG, Lee CT, Chung HS, Kim YW, Han SK et al. Contamination rates between smart cell phones and non-smart cell phones of healthcare workers. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(3):144-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/jhm.2011]
15. Farhan MB, Abdulla KK. Isolation and diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria from the upper surface of the cell phone screen and conduct an antibiotic sensitivity test. Int J Drug Deliv Technol. 2019;9(2):222-5. [Link] [DOI:10.25258/ijddt.9.2.17]
16. Bhoonderowa A, Gookool S, Biranjia-Hurdoyal SD. The importance of mobile phones in the possible transmission of bacterial infections in the community. J Community Health. 2014;39(5):965-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10900-014-9838-6]
17. World Health Organization. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/report-on-the-burden-of-endemic-health-care-associated-infection-worldwide. [Link]
18. Qi C. Double-edged sword? Exploring the impact of students' academic usage of mobile devices on technostress and academic performance. Behav Inf Technol. 2019;38:1337-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2019.1585476]
19. Hossain SFA, Nurunnabi M, Hussain K, Saha SK. Effects of variety-seeking intention by mobile phone usage on university students' academic performance. Cogent Educ. 2019;6(1):1-18. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574692]
20. Verma DK, Barasa A, Dara D, W/Medehen H, Asrat H, Demissie N, Tegenaw K, Sendeku W, Berhane N. Isolation and characterization of bacteria from mobile phones of students and employees at University Of Gondar, Ethiopia. Bull Pharm Res. 2015;5(3):96-100. [Link]
21. Chaman R, Nargeseyan S, Jannesar R, Ravangard S, Nikbakht G. Survey of prevalence and types of bacterial contamination of mobile phones of personnel employed in major wards of educational hospitals in Yasuj. J Fundam Appl Sci. 2018;10(2):449-58. [Link]
22. Katsuse KA, Takahashi H, Yoshizawa S, Tateda K, Kaneko A, Kobayashi I. Staphylococcus aureus surface contamination of mobile phones and presence of genetically identical strains on the hands of nursing personnel. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45(8):929-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.011]
23. Simmonds R, Lee D, Hayhurst E. Mobile phones as fomites for potential pathogens in hospitals: microbiome analysis reveals hidden contaminants. J Hosp Infect. 2020;104(2):207-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.09.010]
24. Roth RR, Jenner WD. Microbial ecology of the skin. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;42:441- 64. [Link] [DOI:10.1146/annurev.mi.42.100188.002301]
25. Pal S, Juyal D, Adekhandi S, Sharma M, Prakash R, Sharma N, Rana A, Parihar A. Mobile phones: Reservoirs for the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:144-9. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/2277-9175.161553]
26. Zaman R, Helmi N. Isolation of bacteria from mobile phones before and after decontamination: Study carried out at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2017;11(35):1371-8. [Link]
27. Al-Abdalall AHA. Isolation and identification of microbes associated with mobile phones in Dammam in eastern Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2010;17(1):11-4. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/1319-1683.68783]
28. Famurewa O, David OM. Cell phone: A medium of transmission of bacterial pathogens. World Rural Obser. 2009;1(2):69‐72. [Link]
29. Soto RG, Chu LG, Goldman JM, Rampil IJ, Ruskin KJ. Communication in critical care environments, Mobile telephones improve patient cares. Anaesth Analg. 2006;102:534-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1213/01.ane.0000194506.79408.79]
30. Rusin P, Maxwell S, Gerba C. Comparative surface‐to‐hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, gram‐negative bacteria and phage. J Appl Microbial. 2002;93(4):585‐92. [Link] [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01734.x]
31. Neely AN, Weber JM, Daviau P, MacGregor A, Miranda C, et al. Computer equipment used in patient care within a multihospital system: Recommendations for cleaning and disinfection. Am J Infect Control. 2005;33(4):233-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.002]
32. Jeske HC, Tiefenthaler W, Hohlrieder M, Hinterberger G, Benzer A. Bacterial contamination of anesthetists' hands by personal mobile phone and fixed phone use in the operating theatre. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(9):904-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05172.x]
33. Neely AN, Sittig DF. Basic microbiologic and infection control information to reduce the potential transmission of pathogens to patients via computer hardware. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(5):500-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1197/jamia.M1082]
34. Jamalludeen NM. Efficacy of tap water or tap water and soap on Hand washing to remove hands-contaminated bacteria. Int J Sci Engin Res. 2017;8(7):1519-37. [Link]
35. Agarry OO, Olaleye MT, Bello-Michael CO. Comparative antimicrobial activities of aloe vera gel and leaf. Afr J Biotechnol 2005;4(12):1413-4. [Link]
36. Cataldi V, Di Bartolomeo S, Di Campli E, Nostro A, Cellini L, Di Giulio M. In vitro activity of Aloe vera inner gel against microorganisms grown in planktonic and sessile phases. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2015;28(4):595-602. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0394632015600594]
37. Verran J. The microbial contamination of mobile communication devices. J Microbiol Biol Educa. 2012;13(1):59-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.351]
38. Koscova J, Hurnikova Z, Pist J. Degree of bacterial contamination of mobile phone and computer keyboard surfaces and efficacy of disinfection with chlorhexidine digluconate and triclosan to its reduction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2238. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph15102238]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.