Volume 9, Issue 3 (2021)
Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(3): 263-269 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Siskawati E, Umar F, Edy Wibowo A, Listyorini H, Wahyudiyono W, Dwikurnaningsih Y, et al . Disconnectedness and Quality: Understanding the Ineffectiveness of Online Learning Emergency during Covid-19. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (3) :263-269
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-54378-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-54378-en.html
E. Siskawati *1, F. Umar2, A. Edy Wibowo3, H. Listyorini4, W. Wahyudiyono5, Y. Dwikurnaningsih6, S. Herlambang5, T. Raharjo7, M. Muttaqin8, S. Putro9, R. Tao Toba MR10, M. Mujazi11
1- Department of Accounting Information System, Faculty of Economics and Business, Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia , ekasiskawati@gmail.com
2- Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
3- Department of Tourism Planning and Development, Faculty of Tourism, Batam Tourism Polytechnic, Batam, Indonesia
4- Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia
5- Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Akademi Manajemen Administrasi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
6- Department of Education Administration, Faculty of Education, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia
7- Department of Craft, Faculty of Fine Arts, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
8- Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
9- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
10- Department of Nursing Profession, Faculty of Health Sciences, Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia
11- Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
2- Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
3- Department of Tourism Planning and Development, Faculty of Tourism, Batam Tourism Polytechnic, Batam, Indonesia
4- Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata Indonesia, Semarang, Indonesia
5- Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Akademi Manajemen Administrasi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
6- Department of Education Administration, Faculty of Education, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia
7- Department of Craft, Faculty of Fine Arts, Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
8- Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
9- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
10- Department of Nursing Profession, Faculty of Health Sciences, Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia
11- Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia
Abstract: (2408 Views)
Aims: The increasing development of information communication technology is increasingly positively impacting individuals in various fields, including education. This research aimed to understand the causes of ineffective online learning from the point of view of activists.
Participants & Methods: This qualitative research was conducted in 2019 in the context of Instructors in the Department of Accounting, Padang State Polytechnic. This study used a phenomenological design with semi-structured interviews that focuses on activists' experiences (egos) who are central to the entire environment. Based on these assumptions, phenomenology seeks to find the intentionality behind the activist's behavior for his understanding.
Findings: In the view point of participants, the causes of ineffective online learning were cultural and emotional. The cultural aspects are categorized under awkwardness with technology and content and characteristics of online learning and the emotional aspects are categorized under instructors' pressures and workload and students’ dishonesty.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of online learning systems is about connectedness and quality. Meaning is a subjective truth that arises from the consciousness of a person who experiences and performs an action.
Participants & Methods: This qualitative research was conducted in 2019 in the context of Instructors in the Department of Accounting, Padang State Polytechnic. This study used a phenomenological design with semi-structured interviews that focuses on activists' experiences (egos) who are central to the entire environment. Based on these assumptions, phenomenology seeks to find the intentionality behind the activist's behavior for his understanding.
Findings: In the view point of participants, the causes of ineffective online learning were cultural and emotional. The cultural aspects are categorized under awkwardness with technology and content and characteristics of online learning and the emotional aspects are categorized under instructors' pressures and workload and students’ dishonesty.
Conclusion: The effectiveness of online learning systems is about connectedness and quality. Meaning is a subjective truth that arises from the consciousness of a person who experiences and performs an action.
Article Type: Qualitative Research |
Subject:
Health Education and Health Behavior
Received: 2021/07/27 | Accepted: 2021/08/15 | Published: 2021/10/17
Received: 2021/07/27 | Accepted: 2021/08/15 | Published: 2021/10/17
References
1. Nuere S, De Miguel L. The digital/technological connection with COVID-19: An unprecedented challenge in university teaching. Technol Knowl Learn. 2020 July:1-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10758-020-09454-6] [PMCID]
2. Rizun M, Strzelecki A. Students' acceptance of the covid-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6468. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186468] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Yusuf BN. Are we prepared enough? a case study of challenges in online learning in a private higher learning institution during the COVID-19 outbreaks. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2020;7(5):205-12. [Link] [DOI:10.14738/assrj.75.8211]
4. Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25:5261-80. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Chen T, Peng L, Jing B, Wu C, Yang J, Cong G. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on user experience with online education platforms in China. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7329. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su12187329]
6. Hussein E, Daoud S, Alrabaiah H, Badawi R. Exploring undergraduate students' attitudes towards emergency online learning during COVID-19: A case from the UAE. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;119:105699. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699]
7. Jonasson JT. Educational change, inertia and potential futures: Why is it difficult to change the content of education. Eur J Futures Res. 2016;4:7. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40309-016-0087-z]
8. Phek-Lin Sim S, Phek-Khiok Sim H, Quah CS. Online learning: A post COVID-19 alternative pedagogy for university students. Asian J Univ Educ. 2021;16(4):137. [Link] [DOI:10.24191/ajue.v16i4.11963]
9. Al-fraihat D, Joy M, Sinclair J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Comput Hum Behav. 2020;102:67-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004]
10. Nie D, Panfilova E, Samusenkov V, Mikhaylov A. E-learning financing models in Russia for sustainable development. Sustainability. 2020;12(11):4412. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su12114412]
11. Bouilheres F, Le LTVH, McDonald S, Nkhoma C, Jandug-Montera L. Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Educ Inf Technol. 2020;25:3049-69. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y]
12. Naji KK, Du X, Tarlochan F, Ebead U, Hasan MA, Al-Ali AK. Engineering students' readiness to transition to emergency online learning in response to COVID-19: Case of Qatar. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2020;16(10):1886. [Link] [DOI:10.29333/ejmste/8474]
13. Supeni S, Hakim L, Jumintono. Strengthening character education of early childhood through javanese traditional game Dakon. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 2019;7(6):243-9. [Link]
14. Chung E, Subramaniam G, Dass LC. Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian J Univ Educ. 2020;16(2):45-58. [Link] [DOI:10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294]
15. Gay GHE. An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. J Comput High Educ. 2016;28(2):199-220. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z]
16. Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N, Ehlers JP, Sostmann K, Peters H. Learning management system and e-learning tools: An experience of medical students' usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:267-73. [Link] [DOI:10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Flores MA, Gago M. Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: National, institutional and pedagogical responses. J Educ Teach. 2020;46(4):507-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709]
18. Edelhauser E, Lupu-Dima L. Is Romania prepared for elearning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability. 2020;12(13):5438. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su12135438]
19. Zhang W, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang C. Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning: China's Education Emergency Management Policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. J Risk Financ Manag. 2020;13(3):55. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/jrfm13030055]
20. Hasan N, Bao Y. Impact of e-Learning crack-up perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of fear of academic year loss. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;118:105355. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Jung H, Brady C. Maintaining rich dialogic interactions in the transition to synchronous online learning. Inf Learn Sci. 2020;121(5):391-400. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0096]
22. Sikhangezile N, Modise MA. Social distancing, cultural and psychological effects on learners in a rural setting in Zimbabwe. J Ethn Cult Stud. 2020;7(3):200-9. [Link] [DOI:10.29333/ejecs/503]
23. Huang CQ, Han ZM, Li MX, Jong MSY, Tsai CC. Investigating students' interaction patterns and dynamic learning sentiments in online discussions. Comput Educ. 2019;140:103589. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.015]
24. Halif MM, Hassan N, Sumardi NA, Omar AS, Ali S, Aziz RA, et al. Moderating effects of student motivation on the relationship between learning styles and student engagement. Asian J Univ Educ. 2020;16(2):94-103. [Link] [DOI:10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10301]
25. Santoso FP, Mulyoto D, Hanif M. Inculcating character values to the student of polytechnic ATMI Surakarta vocational school. Univ J Educ Res. 2020;8(3):79-89. [Link] [DOI:10.13189/ujer.2020.081712]
26. Alessio HM, Malay N, Maurer K, John Bailer A, Rubin B. Interaction of proctoring and student major on online test performance. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2018;19(5):166-85. [Link] [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3698]
27. Clark TM, Callam CS, Paul NM, Stoltzfus MW, Turner D. Testing in the time of COVID-19: A sudden transition to unproctored online exams. J Chem Educ. 2020;97(9):3413-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00546]
28. Eslaminejad T, Masood M, Ngah NA. Assessment of instructors' readiness for implementing e-learning in continuing medical education in Iran. Med Teach. 2010;32(10):407-12. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2010.496006] [PMID]
29. Syed AM, Ahmad S, Alaraifi A, Rafi W. Identification of operational risks impeding the implementation of eLearning in higher education system. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26:655-71. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10281-6]
30. Scherer R, Siddiq F, Tondeur J. The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers ' adoption of digital technology in education. Comput Educ. 2019;128:13-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009]
31. Ohliati J, Abbas BS. Measuring students satisfaction in using learning management system. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(4):180-9. [Link] [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v14i04.9427]
32. Soffer T, Kahan T, Nachmias R. Patterns of students' utilization of flexibility in online academic courses and their relation to course achievement. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2019;20(3):202-20. [Link] [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.3949]
33. Ebner M, Scho S, Braun C, Ebner M, Grigoriadis Y, Haas M, et al. COVID-19 epidemic as e-learning boost ? chronological development and effects at an austrian university against the background of the concept of e-learning readiness. Future Internet. 2020;12(6):94. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/fi12060094]
34. Panyajamorn T, Suanmali S, Kohda Y, Chongphaisal P, Supnithi T. Effectiveness of e-learning design and affecting variables in Thai public schools. Malays J Learn Instr. 2018;15(1):1-34. [Link]
35. Ahmady AE, Barker M, Dragonetti R, Fahim M, Selby P. A qualitative evaluation of an online expert-facilitated course on tobacco dependence treatment. Inquiry. 2017;54:46958017732967. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0046958017732967] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Mustafa MZB, Nordin MNB, Abdul Razzaq ARB. Structural equation modelling using AMOS: Confirmatory factor analysis for taskload of special education integration program teachers. Univ J Educ Res. 2020;8(1):127-33. [Link] [DOI:10.13189/ujer.2020.080115]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |