Volume 9, Issue 4 (2021)
Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(4): 357-363 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kazemi S, Zarei F, Alhani F, Heidarnia A. Social Determinants of Health in Cervical Cancer. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (4) :357-363
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-53346-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-53346-en.html
1- Health Education Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Health Education Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran ,f.zarei@modares.ac.ir
3- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Health Education Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2176 Views)
Aims: One of the crucial issues of the health system in developing countries is the unequal distribution of health, which leads to inequality in social status and living conditions. Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women aged 20 to 39 in developing countries. However, its social determinants are not yet fully understood. The present systematic review was conducted to collect the social determinants of health in cervical cancer that have been identified so far.
Information & Methods: This systematic review was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021 by reviewing Persian and English articles published in journals on social determinants of cervical cancer by the PRISMA method. First, the scientific databases were searched in the period 2000-2020 using "Social Determinants of Health", "Human Papillomavirus", and "Cervical Cancer" keywords (2333 English articles and 63 Persian articles were found). After evaluation, 20 articles (18 English and 2 Persian articles) were included in the study. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes) checklist extracted data from selected articles.
Findings: articles were reviewed, and social determinants of health in cervical cancer were presented in two general categories: structural (education, income, and race and ethnicity) and intermediate (access to services, behavioral factors, environmental-living conditions, and psychosocial factors).
Conclusion: The social determinants of health in the structural and intermediate sectors and their interaction affect cervical cancer. All aspects of cervical cancer are affected by prevention, screening, early detection, treatment, and rehabilitation.
Information & Methods: This systematic review was conducted from December 2020 to April 2021 by reviewing Persian and English articles published in journals on social determinants of cervical cancer by the PRISMA method. First, the scientific databases were searched in the period 2000-2020 using "Social Determinants of Health", "Human Papillomavirus", and "Cervical Cancer" keywords (2333 English articles and 63 Persian articles were found). After evaluation, 20 articles (18 English and 2 Persian articles) were included in the study. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes) checklist extracted data from selected articles.
Findings: articles were reviewed, and social determinants of health in cervical cancer were presented in two general categories: structural (education, income, and race and ethnicity) and intermediate (access to services, behavioral factors, environmental-living conditions, and psychosocial factors).
Conclusion: The social determinants of health in the structural and intermediate sectors and their interaction affect cervical cancer. All aspects of cervical cancer are affected by prevention, screening, early detection, treatment, and rehabilitation.
Article Type: Systematic Review |
Subject:
Social Determinants of Health
Received: 2021/05/17 | Accepted: 2021/08/17 | Published: 2021/11/29
Received: 2021/05/17 | Accepted: 2021/08/17 | Published: 2021/11/29
References
1. Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Schunemann HJ, Arbyn M, Blumenthal PD, Cain J, et al. World health organization guidelines for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 and screen‐and‐treat strategies to prevent cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):252-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.038] [PMID]
2. Canfell K, Kim JJ, Brisson M, Keane A, Simms KT, Caruana M, et al. Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: A comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):591-603. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4]
3. World health organization. WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550598. [Link]
4. Ghahramani M, Moodi M, Alami A, Moasheri N. Stages of pap smear screening change behavior based on TTM in women referring to health centers in Gonabad-years 1393. Mod Care J. 2015;11(4):304-15. [Persian] [Link]
5. Alyaemni A, Teobald S, Faragher B, Jehan K, Tolhurst R. Gender inequities in health: An exploratory qualitative study of Saudi women's perceptions. Women Health. 2013;53(7):741-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/03630242.2013.829169] [PMID]
6. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ijc.29210] [PMID]
7. Aminisani N, Armstrong BK, Canfell K. Cervical cancer screening in Middle Eastern and Asian migrants to Australia: A record linkage study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(6):394-400. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.009] [PMID]
8. Khodakarami N, Farah F, Yavari P, Khayamzadeh M, Taheripanah R, Esmaeil Akbari M. The new guideline for cervical cancer screening in low risk Iranian women. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2014;17(95):8-17. [Persian] [Link]
9. Haghshenas M, Golini-Moghaddam T, Rafiei A, Emadian O, Sheykhpour A, Ashrafi GH. Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus in patients with cervical cancer: A population-based study. Infect Agent Cancer. 2013;8(1):20. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1750-9378-8-20] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Zaboli R, Sanaeinasab H. The Challenges and Solutions for Action of Social Determinants of Health in Iran: A qualitative study. Iran J Health Educ Commun. 2014;2(1):5-16. [Persian] [Link]
11. Homedes N, Ugalde A. Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America. Health Policy. 2005;71(1):83-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.011] [PMID]
12. Exworthy M. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: using conceptual models to understand the policy process. Health Policy Plan. 2008;23(5):318-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/heapol/czn022] [PMID]
13. Raphael D. Escaping from the phantom zone: Social determinants of health, public health units and public policy in Canada. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(2):193-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/heapro/dap005] [PMID]
14. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6]
15. Dolatian M, Mirabzadeh A, Forozan AS, Sajjadi H, Alavi Majd H, Moafi F. Preterm delivery and psycho-social determinants of health based on World Health Organization model in Iran: A narrative review. Glob J Health Sci. 2013;5(1):52-64. [Link] [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v5n1p52] [PMID]
16. Dekker S. Focusing climate change policy on health in cities. Rev Environ Energy Econ. 2014, Sep. [Link]
17. Anderko L. Achieving health equity on a global scale through a community‐based, public health framework for action. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38(3):486-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00507.x] [PMID]
18. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Al-Naggar RA, Low W, Isa ZM. Knowledge and barriers towards cervical cancer screening among young women in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(4):867-73. [Link]
20. Williams-Brennan L, Gastaldo D, Cole DC, Paszat L. Social determinants of health associated with cervical cancer screening among women living in developing countries: A scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1487-505. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00404-012-2575-0] [PMID]
21. Tsu VD, Levin CE. Making the case for cervical cancer prevention: What about equity. Reprod Health Matters. 2008;16(32):104-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0968-8080(08)32411-2]
22. Claeys P, Gonzalez C, Gonzalez M, Page H, Bello RE, Temmerman M. Determinants of cervical cancer screening in a poor area: Results of a population‐based survey in Rivas, Nicaragua. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7(11):935-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00953.x] [PMID]
23. Winkler J, Bingham A, Coffey P, Handwerker WP. Women's participation in a cervical cancer screening program in northern Peru. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(1):10-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/her/cyl156] [PMID]
24. Drain PK, Holmes KK, Hughes JP, Koutsky LA. Determinants of cervical cancer rates in developing countries. Int J Cancer. 2002;100(2):199-205. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ijc.10453] [PMID]
25. Reyes-Ortiz CA, Velez LF, Camacho ME, Ottenbacher KJ, Markides KS. Health insurance and cervical cancer screening among older women in Latin American and Caribbean cities. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(4):870-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ije/dyn096] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Paz Soldan VA, Lee FH, Carcamo C, Holmes KK, Garnett GP, Garcia P. Who is getting pap smears in urban Peru. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(4):862-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ije/dyn118] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Manica ST, De Lordes Drachler M, Teixeira LB, Ferla AA, Gouveia HG, Anschau F, et al. Socioeconomic and regional inequalities of pap smear coverage. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2016;37(1):52287. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1983-1447.2016.01.52287] [PMID]
28. Jafari Shobeiri M, Chapari Ilkhchi A. Role of demographic and socioeconomic factors in cervical cancer. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2011;13(6):22-31. [Persian] [Link]
29. Von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J. Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: A conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):135-47. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/epirev/mxq018] [PMID]
30. Cuesta DIL, Gomez Gutierrez LF. Accessibility to healthcare services in the recent cervical cytology performed in an urban area in Colombia. Revista Espanola Salud Publica. 2004;78(3):367-77. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.1590/S1135-57272004000300006] [PMID]
31. Visanuyothin S, Chompikul J, Mongkolchati A. Determinants of cervical cancer screening adherence in urban areas of Nakhon Ratchasima province, Thailand. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(6):543-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2015.04.018] [PMID]
32. Ansink A, Tlhurst R, Haque R, Saha S, Datta S, Van Den Broek NR. Cervical cancer in Bangladesh: Community perceptions of cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(5):499-505. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.01.022] [PMID]
33. Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Arrossi S, Theresa R, Esmy PO, Mahe C, et al. Determinants of participation of women in a cervical cancer visual screening trial in rural south India. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(6):457-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cdp.2003.09.006] [PMID]
34. Greenwald S, Conover LF. An approach to establish behavioral determinants for predicting participation in cervical cancer screening of Haitian women. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):154. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.530]
35. Petkeviciene J, Ivanauskiene R, Klumbiene J. Sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants of non-attendance for cervical cancer screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014. Public Health. 2018;156:79-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.014] [PMID]
36. Jeong SJ, Saroha E, Knight J, Roofe M, Jolly PE. Determinants of adequate follow-up of an abnormal Papanicolaou result among Jamaican women in Portland, Jamaica. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(2):211-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.004] [PMID] [PMCID]
37. Idowu A, Olowookere SA, Fagbemi AT, Ogunlaja OA. Determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among women in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: A community-based study. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;2016:6469240. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2016/6469240] [PMID] [PMCID]
38. Tiruneh FN, Chuang KY, Morton Ntenda PA, Chuang YC. Individual-level and community-level determinants of cervical cancer screening among Kenyan women: A multilevel analysis of a nationwide survey. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):109. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12905-017-0469-9] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Amin R, Kolahi AA, Jahanmehr N, Abadi AR, Sohrabi MR. Disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 nationwide STEPS survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1594. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09705-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Harder E, Juul KE, Jensen SM, Thomsen LT, Frederikson K, Kjaer SK. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening: A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark. Prev Med. 2018;111:94-100. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035] [PMID]
41. Singh GK. Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975-1999. New York: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2003. [Link]
42. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2):78-93. [Link] [DOI:10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |