Volume 10, Issue 2 (2022)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(2): 277-283 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rahimi Khalifeh Kandi Z, Estebsari F, Jalilibahabadi F, Sheikh Milani A, Estebsari K, Mostafaei D. Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life of Pregnant Women Based on Pender’s Model Constructs. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (2) :277-283
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-52867-en.html
1- Department of Health Education, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran , fa_estebsari@yahoo.com
3- “Student Research Committee” and “Community Health Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery”, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
5- Azna Health Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
6- Shahada Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (249 Views)
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the predictors of health-related quality of life in pregnant women based on Pender’s health promotion model.
Instrument & Methods: In this descriptive correlational study, 300 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy were selected by simple random sampling from one of the community health centers of Yazd province. Data were collected through a demographic information questionnaire, a short-form health survey v.1, and a questionnaire based on Pender's model constructs. Finally, the obtained data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS 18 software.
Findings: The psychological dimension of quality of life was significantly correlated with perceived effects, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived benefits (p<0.05). Also, the physical dimension of quality of life had a significant correlation with perceived barriers, social support, affect, and benefits (p<0.05). The regression analysis results showed that the variables of perceived barriers, social support, positive and negative effect, and perceived benefits had significant effects on the physical dimension of health-related quality of life (p<0.002). Moreover, the variables of positive and negative affect, self-efficacy, and perceived benefits influenced the psychological dimension of health-related quality of life (p<0.001).
Conclusion: According to the results, perceived effect, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived benefits constructs are suitable for the psychological dimension of health-related quality of life, perceived barrier constructs, and social support effects. The perceived benefits are appropriate for predicting the physical dimension of quality of life.
Article number: 10
Full-Text [PDF 496 kb]   (261 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (3 Views)  
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey | Subject: Family Health Education/Promotion
Received: 2021/08/28 | Accepted: 2021/10/29 | Published: 2022/05/31
* Corresponding Author Address: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 1985717443

References
1. Chenary R, Noroozi A, Tahmasebi R. Health Promoting Behaviors in Veterans in Ilam Province. J Mil Med. 2013;15(1):95-102. [Persian] [Link]
2. Mirghafourvand M, Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi S, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Tavananezhad N, Karkhane M. Predictors of health-related quality of life in Iranian women of reproductive age. Appl Rese Qual Life. 2015;11(3):723-37. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11482-015-9392-0]
3. Lashani F, et al. Exploring the relationship between sexual function, sense of coherence, well-being in a sample of Iranian breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2020;29(6):3191-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05831-0]
4. Raisi Filabadi Z, Estebsari F, Sheikh Milani A, Feizi Sh, Nasiri M. Relationship between electronic health literacy, quality of life, self-efficacy in Tehran, Iran: a community-based study. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:175. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_63_20]
5. Jalili Bahabadi F, Estebsari F, Rohani C, Rahimi Khalifeh Kandi Z, Sefidkar R, Mostafaei D. Predictors of health-promoting lifestyle in pregnant women based on Pender's health promotion model. Int J Women Health. 2020;12:71-7. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S235169]
6. Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9]
7. Abedi P, Jorfi M, Afshari P. Evaluation of the health promotion lifestyle and its related factors in reproductive aged women in Ahvaz, Iran. Commun Health J. 2015;9(1):68-74. [Persian] [Link]
8. Harvey T, Zkik A, Auges M, Clavel T. Assessment of iron deficiency and anemia in pregnant women: an observational French study. Women Health. 2016;12(1):95-102. [Link] [DOI:10.2217/whe.15.91]
9. Abbaspoor Z, Sarparast Razmju P, Hekmat Kh. Relation between quality of life and mental health in pregnant women with prior pregnancy loss. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(10):1290-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jog.13061]
10. Oviedo Caro MA, Bueno-Antequera J, Munguía-Izquierdo D. Explanatory factors and levels of health-related quality of life among healthy pregnant women at midpregnancy: a cross-sectional study of the pregnactive project. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(12):2766-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jan.13787]
11. Yilmaz E, Soysal C, Icer B. The impact of iron deficiency anemia on health related quality of life in the last trimester of pregnancy. EJMI. 2019;3(3):182-8. [Turkish] [Link] [DOI:10.14744/ejmi.2019.65035]
12. Lu HX, Xu W, Wong MCM, Wei TY, Feng XP. Impact of periodontal conditions on the quality of life of pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:67. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12955-015-0267-8]
13. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ, Asadi-Lari M, Omidvari S, Tavousi M. The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): A population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:12. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-9-12]
14. Pashaie S, Estebsari F, Matbouei M, Nasiri M. Evaluation of the effect of patient education on the quality of life cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a review article. J Pharmaceut Res Int. 2019:31(5):1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.9734/jpri/2019/v31i530309]
15. Mohamadian H, Eftekhar Ardebili H, Rahimi Foroushani A, Taghdisi M, Shojaiezade D. Evaluation of Pender's health promotion model for predicting adolescent girls' quality of life. J Sch Public Health Instit Public Health Res. 2011;8(4):1-13. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00591.x]
16. Mohamadian H, Eftekhar H, Rahimi A, Taghdisi Mohamad H, Shojaiezade D, Montazeri A. Predicting health-related quality of life by using a health promotion model among Iranian adolescent girls: a structural equation modeling approach. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(2):141-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00591.x]
17. Kolu P, Raitanen J, Luoto R. Physical activity and health-related quality of life during pregnancy: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(9):2098-105. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10995-014-1457-4]
18. Krzepota J, Sadowska D, Biernat E. Relationships between physical activity and quality of life in pregnant women in the second and third trimester. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2745. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph15122745]
19. Marshall ES, Bland H, Melton B. Perceived barriers to physical activity among pregnant women living in a rural community. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(4):361-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/phn.12006]
20. Attard CL, Kohli MA, Coleman S, Bradley C, Hux M, Atanackovic G, et al. The burden of illness of severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Understanding):S220-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1067/mob.2002.122605]
21. Lawan A, Awotidebe AW, Oyeyemi AL, Rufa'i AA, Oyeyemi AY. Relationship between physical activity and health related quality of life among pregnant women. Afr J Reprod Health. 2018;22(3):80-9. [Link]
22. Tendais I, Figueiredo B, Mota J, Conde A. Physical activity, health-related quality of life and depression during pregnancy. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(2):219-28. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2011000200003]
23. Robinson-Smith G, Johnston MV, Allen J. Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, depression after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(4):460-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1053/mr.2000.3863]
24. Guszkowska M, Langwald M, Zaremba A, Dudziak D. The correlates of mental health of well-educated Polish women in the first pregnancy. J Ment Health. 2014;23(6):328-32. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/09638237.2014.971144]
25. Goodarzi-Khoigani M, Baghiani Moghadam MH, Nadjarzadeh A, Mardanian F, Fallahzadeh H, Mazloomy-Mahmoodabad SS. Impact of nutrition education in improving dietary pattern during pregnancy based on pender's health promotion model: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23(1):18-25. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_198_16]
26. Heydari A, Khorashadizadeh F. Pender's health promotion model in medical research. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(9):1067-74. [Link]
27. Mohamadi zeidi I, Alijanzadeh M, Pakpour Hajiagha A. Factors predicting oral health-related behaviors in diabetic patients using Pender's oral health promotion model. J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2016;12(2):183-98. [Persian] [Link]
28. Han KS, Lee SJ, Park ES, Park YJ, Cheol KH. Structural model for quality of life of patients with chronic cardiovascular disease in Korea. Nurs Res. 2005;54(2):85-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/00006199-200503000-00003]
29. Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):797-810. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2010.511415]
30. Emmanuel E, St John W, Sun J. Relationship between social support and quality of life in childbearing women during the perinatal period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 2012;41(6):E62-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01400.x]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.