Volume 7, Issue 2 (2019)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2019, 7(2): 95-102 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fallahi A, Nemat Shahrbabaki B, Shahoei R, Aala F, Ahmadi S. Exploring the Components of Professional Ethics in Teaching, from the Perspective of Faculty Members in Iran. Health Educ Health Promot 2019; 7 (2) :95-102
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-24658-en.html
1- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , arezofalahi91@gmail.com
2- Health Network of Sanandaj, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Nursing & Midwifery Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Parasitology & Mycology Department, Medicine Faculty, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
5- Computer Department, Technical Faculty, Sanandaj University of Girly Technical Professional, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract:   (3626 Views)
Aims: Professional ethics plays an important role in all professions; however, it has more importance among faculty members of universities. The aim of the current study was to explore the components of professional ethics in teaching from the perspective of faculty members in Iran.
Participants & Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in Sanandaj, Iran, in 2017. Using purposive sampling, 15 faculty members of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences with educational experience were included in the study. Data were collected through individual interviews, group discussions, and field notes; and they were analyzed by conventional content analysis. To confirm the accuracy and strength of the data, acceptability, confirmability, and transferability factors were taken into account.
Findings: The results of data analyses yielded four major themes, including “characteristics of professors”, “professors' capabilities”, “protect of respects”, and “promoting the university”.
Conclusion: The results of this study showed that in teaching, there are different aspects in the field of professional ethics of professors.
Full-Text [PDF 535 kb]   (3257 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Health Communication
Received: 2018/09/1 | Accepted: 2018/12/2 | Published: 2019/04/9
* Corresponding Author Address: Health Faculty, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences Sanandaj, Kurdistan ,Iran. Postal Code: 6617713446

1. Farmahini Farahani M, Farmahini Farahani F. The study on professional ethics components among faculty members in the engineering. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:2085-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.524]
2. Karamporian A, Imeni B, Torkzaban P. The attitude of faculty members towards professional ethics at Hamadan University School of Dentistry. J Res Dent Sci. 2013;10(1):43-51. [Persian] [Link]
3. Öztürk S. The opinions of preschool teachers about ethical principles. Educ Sci Theory Pract. 2010;10(1):393-418. [Link]
4. Badiyepeymaie Jahromi Z, Parandavar N, Ahmadi Vasmehjani A, Eslami Akbar R, Dolatkhah HR, Rahmanian A, et al. Perspective of students about professional ethics compliance of clinical instructors in Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. J Educ Ethics Nurs. 2014;3(2):55-63. [Persian] [Link]
5. Flite CA, Harman LB. Code of ethics: principles for ethical leadership. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013;10:1. [Link]
6. Hall, A, Berardino L. Teaching Professional Behaviors: Differences in the Perceptions of Faculty, Students, and Employers. J Bus Ethics. 2006;63:(4):407-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10551-005-2411-6]
7. Bouzarjomehri F, Mansourian M, Herandi Y, Bouzarjomehri H. Academics' adherence to professional ethics in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Science: Students' viewpoint. J Med Educ Dev. 2013;8(3):44-52. [Persian] [Link]
8. Khaghanizadeh M, Malaki H, Abbasi M, Abbaspour A, Mohammadi E. Faculty-related challenges in medical ethics education: A qualitative study. Iran J Med Educ. 2012;11(8):903-16. [Persian] [Link]
9. Yamani N, Liaghatdar MJ, Changiz T, Adibi P. How do medical students learn professionalism during clinical education? a qualitative study of faculty members' and interns' experiences. Iran J Med Educ. 2010;9(4):382-95. [Persian] [Link]
10. Abbasi M, Fadavi M, Bazmi S. The underlying factors affecting the ethical performance of health service providers when faced with disasters: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2017;10:14. [Link]
11. Malone JL. Professional ethics in context: Practising rural Canadian psychologists. J Bioeth Inq. 2012;9(4):463-77. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11673-012-9394-7]
12. Chaar B, Brien J, Krass I. Professional ethics in pharmacy: The Australian experience. Int J Pharm Pract. 2005;13(3):195-204. [Link] [DOI:10.1211/ijpp.13.3.0005]
13. Sobhani Nejad M, Najafi H, Jafari Harandi R, Farmahini Farahani M. Teaching professional ethics components from the viewpoint of students, Qom University of Medical Sciences. Bimon Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2015;7(6):399-403. [Persian] [Link]
14. Fallahi A, Derakhshan S, Pashaee T, Teymoori P. Factors affecting self-care in women with osteoporosis: A qualitative study with the content analysis approach. Sci J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res. 2015;13(2):17-32. [Persian] [Link]
15. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005. [Link]
16. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. [Link]
17. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-88. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687]
18. Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications; 1996. [Link]
19. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2000;1(2):Art. 20. [Link]
20. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001]
21. Glicken AD, Merenstein GB. Addressing the hidden curriculum: Understanding educator professionalism. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):54-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01421590601182602]
22. Nadelson S. Academic misconduct by university students: Faculty perceptions and responses. Plagiary. 2007;2:67-76. [Link]
23. Fallahi A, Ghahramani E, Fallahi P, Zarezadeh Y. Exploring spiritual needs and related skills in public health students. Sci J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res. 2016;13(4):85-96. [Persian] [Link]
24. Yüksel S. Kohlberg and hidden curriculum in moral education: An opportunity for students' acquisition of moral values in the new Turkish primary education curriculum. Educ Sci Theory Pract. 2005;5(2):329-38. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.