Volume 6, Issue 3 (2018)
Health Educ Health Promot 2018, 6(3): 87-90 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mokhtari F, Rezaei Adaryani A, Kazemi A, Ehsanpour S. Impact of Educational Program on Parental Nutritional Social Support among Parents' Female Adolescents. Health Educ Health Promot 2018; 6 (3) :87-90
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-15434-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-15434-en.html
1- Reproductive Health Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran , f.mokhtary@ymail.com
2- Radiology Department, Medical Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
3- Reproductive Health Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Medical Education Department, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Radiology Department, Medical Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
3- Reproductive Health Department, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4- Medical Education Department, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract: (5420 Views)
Aims: Adolescence is a golden chance for preventing the harms caused by unhealthy behaviors and it is the time for choosing a permanent healthy lifestyle. The aim of study was to evaluate the impact of educational program on parental nutritional social support among parents' female adolescents.
Materials & Methods: The present field trial was conducted from January to May, 2016. Sixty-three female adolescents (33 persons in intervention group and 30 persons in control group) with the age range of 12 to 15 years at schools of Isfahan, Iran, were selected by multistage random sampling method as the samples of the study. Samples were randomly allocated to two groups. Adolescents’ perceived and received social support from their parents was measured, using a researcher-made questionnaire, of which the validity and reliability were approved. The intervention included 3 educational sessions (each session took 2 hours) within a one-week interval for adolescents’ parents. One month after performing the educational intervention for parents, adolescents’ received and perceived social support for having a healthy diet was measured. The data were analyzed, using SPSS 19 and independent t test, paired t test, Chi square, and Mann-Whitney test.
Findings: There was no significant difference between two groups regarding the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Also, no significant difference was observed between the two groups after the intervention regarding the mean level of their perceived and received nutritional social support.
Conclusion: Educational intervention on parents does not increase perceived and received social support in early adolescents for receiving healthy nutrients.
Materials & Methods: The present field trial was conducted from January to May, 2016. Sixty-three female adolescents (33 persons in intervention group and 30 persons in control group) with the age range of 12 to 15 years at schools of Isfahan, Iran, were selected by multistage random sampling method as the samples of the study. Samples were randomly allocated to two groups. Adolescents’ perceived and received social support from their parents was measured, using a researcher-made questionnaire, of which the validity and reliability were approved. The intervention included 3 educational sessions (each session took 2 hours) within a one-week interval for adolescents’ parents. One month after performing the educational intervention for parents, adolescents’ received and perceived social support for having a healthy diet was measured. The data were analyzed, using SPSS 19 and independent t test, paired t test, Chi square, and Mann-Whitney test.
Findings: There was no significant difference between two groups regarding the demographic characteristics of the two groups. Also, no significant difference was observed between the two groups after the intervention regarding the mean level of their perceived and received nutritional social support.
Conclusion: Educational intervention on parents does not increase perceived and received social support in early adolescents for receiving healthy nutrients.
Article Type: Original Article |
Subject:
Health Communication
Received: 2017/08/4 | Accepted: 2018/06/2 | Published: 2018/09/9
Received: 2017/08/4 | Accepted: 2018/06/2 | Published: 2018/09/9
References
1. Dahl RE, Gunnar MR. Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: Implications for psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21(1):1-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S0954579409000017]
2. Kazemi A, Nekuei Zahraei NS, Nazarian N. The relation between intra- and interpersonal factors and food consumption level among Iranian adolescent girls. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016;21(2):147-52. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/1735-9066.178235]
3. Mokhtari F, Kazemi A, Ehsanpour S. Effect of educational intervention program for parents on adolescents' nutritional behaviors in Isfahan in 2016. J Edu Health Promot. 2017;6:103. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_155_16]
4. Kothe EJ, Mullan BA, Butow P. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. Testing an intervention based on the theory of planned behavior. Appetite. 2012;58(3):997-1004. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.012]
5. Patrick H, Nicklas TA. A review of family and social determinants of children's eating patterns and diet quality. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005;24(2):83-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/07315724.2005.10719448]
6. Cutler GJ, Flood A, Hannan P, Neumark-Sztainer D. Multiple sociodemographic and socioenvironmental characteristics are correlated with major patterns of dietary intake in adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(2):230-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.052]
7. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess.1990;55(3-4):610-17. [Link]
8. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3]
9. Heredia NI, Ranjit N, Warren JL, Evans AE. Association of parental social support with energy balance-related behaviors in low-income and ethnically diverse children: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1182. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3829-8]
10. Ebrahim Z, De Villiers A, T Ahmed. Factors influencing adherence to dietary guidelines: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with type 2 diabetes attending a clinic in Cape Town. J Endocrinol Metabol Diabetes S Afr. 2014;19(2):76-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/16089677.2014.11073604]
11. Vekiri I, Chronaki A. Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Comput Education. 2008;51(3):1392-404. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003]
12. 12- Vekiri I, Chronaki A. Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Comput Education. 2008;51(3):1392-404. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003]
13. Tamanai Far MR, Laith H, Mansouri N A. The relationship of social support perceived with Student self-efficacy. J Soc Psychol. 2013;2(28):31-39 [Persian] [Link]
14. Tamanai Far MR, Leith H, Mansouri Nic A. The relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy among students. J Soc Psychol. 2013;8(28):31-9. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |