Volume 11, Issue 3 (2023)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2023, 11(3): 405-410 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nugraha A, Kusnadi E, Patimah I, Sitorus P, Al Maki W. Development of Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Display: Teaching Infection Prevention and Control to Millennial Nursing Students. Health Educ Health Promot 2023; 11 (3) :405-410
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-69686-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, STIKes Karsa Husda Garut, Garut, Indonesia
2- Department of Economic and Business, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
3- Department of Informatics, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
Abstract:   (502 Views)
Aims: Teaching infection prevention and control to millennial nursing students is a challenge. This study aimed to develop a virtual reality head-mounted display to teach millennial nursing students about infection prevention and control related to catheter-associated urinary tract infections.
Instrument & Methods: This study used the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) model. Using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), 115 nursing students at the College of Health Sciences at Karsa Husada Garut, West Java Province, Indonesia selected using purposive sampling, were evaluated. The data obtained were analyzed with UEQ Data Analysis Tool version 10.
Findings: The designed program showed excellent attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, accuracy, stimulation, and novelty, with mean values of 2.26 (95%CI: 2.162-2.362), 2.30 (95%CI: 2.167-2.425), 1.89 (95%CI: 1.646-2.139), 1.88 (95%CI: 1.536-2.225), 1.72 (95%CI: 1.304-2.127), and 1.61 (95%CI: 1.225-1.990), respectively.
Conclusions: The infection prevention and control program on the virtual reality display is excellent in terms of attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, accuracy, stimulation, and novelty, making it suitable for millennial nursing students.
Full-Text [PDF 600 kb]   (610 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (44 Views)  
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey | Subject: Technology of Health Education
Received: 2023/06/9 | Accepted: 2023/07/25 | Published: 2023/08/18
* Corresponding Author Address: Jln. Nusa Indah No.24, Garut, West Java, Indonesia. Postal Code: 44151 (andrinugraha@outlook.com)

References
1. Nababan TM, Purba S, Siburian P. The challenge of being a teacher in industrial revolution 4.0 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press. Available from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aisteel-20/125946454. [Link] [DOI:10.2991/assehr.k.201124.047]
2. Jiang J, Zeng L, Kue J, Li H, Shi Y, Chen C. Effective teaching behaviors in the emergency department: A qualitative study with Millennial nursing students in Shanghai. Nurse Educ Today 2018;61:220-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.007]
3. Lengetti E, Kronk R, Ulmer KW, Wilf K, Murphy D, Rosanelli M, et al. An innovative approach to educating nurses to clinical competence: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Pract 2018;33:159-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2018.08.007]
4. Zhang H, Liao AWX, Goh SH, Wu XV, Yoong SQ. Effectiveness of peer teaching in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2022;118:105499. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105499]
5. Relloso JT, AbuAlula NA, Medina JM, Manood EG. Nursing Skills Laboratory as Milieu of Clinical Learning and Practice. Am J Nurs Res. 2021;9(4):112-7. [Link] [DOI:10.12691/ajnr-9-4-2]
6. Rubi H, Mudey G, Kunjalwar R. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30385. [Link] [DOI:10.7759/cureus.30385]
7. Jadaun D, Gupta D, Sbhagat D, Kasif Sahajada Priyanka Jadaun S, Gupta S, Kasif Sahajada S, et al. to observe the incidence and prevention of catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) in short and long-term patient care at a tertiary care hospital in Ghaziabad. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13:838-43. [Link]
8. Shanmukhe A, Pujar S, Chopade S, Professor A. To assess the incidence of catheter associated urinary tract infection and evaluate the effectiveness of evidence based practice protocol for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in adult critical care patients. India J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2022;16(4):112-8. [Link] [DOI:10.37506/ijfmt.v16i4.18549]
9. Parker V, Giles M, Graham L, Suthers B, Watts W, O'Brien T, et al. Avoiding inappropriate urinary catheter use and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): A pre-post control intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):314. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2268-2]
10. Ronin D, Felix RB, Williams CM, Mannuel SA, Goeres D, Summers J, et al. Prevention of biofilms in catheter-associated urinary tract Infections (CAUTIs): A review. Antibiofilm Strategies. 2022;61-97. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-10992-8_4]
11. Nugraha A, Puspita T, Patimah I, Dipa Nagara A. Comparison of 10% povidone iodine and sterile water as a periuretra cleansing solution before the insertion of indwelling urine cathether on the occurance of bacteria. Int J Pharm Res. 2019;11(4):811-6. [Link] [DOI:10.31838/ijpr/2019.11.04.087]
12. Ferszt GG, Dugas J, McGrane C, Calderelli K. Creative strategies for teaching millennial nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2017;42(6):275-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000384]
13. Burton R. Nursing students perceptions of using YouTube to teach psychomotor skills: A comparative pilot study. Sage Open Nues. 2022;8:23779608221117385. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/23779608221117385]
14. Gause G, Mokgaola IO, Rakhudu MA. Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: An integrative review. Curationis. 2022;45(1):2261. [Link] [DOI:10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2261]
15. Kalthur SG, Pandey AK, Prabhath S. Benefits and pitfalls of learning anatomy using the dissection module in an indian medical school: A millennial Learner's perspective. Translational Res Anat. 2022;26:100159. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tria.2021.100159]
16. Süncksen M, Bendig H, Teistler M, Wagner M, Bott OJ, Dresing K. Gamification and virtual reality for teaching mobile x-ray imaging. IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health; 2018 May 16-18. Vienna: SeGAH; 2018. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/SeGAH.2018.8401364]
17. Bracq MS, Michinov E, Jannin P. Virtual reality simulation in nontechnical skills training for healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Simul Healthc. 2019;14(3):188-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000347]
18. Mäkinen H, Haavisto E, Havola S, Koivisto JM. User experiences of virtual reality technologies for healthcare in learning: An integrative review. Behav Inf Technol. 2020;41(1):1-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2020.1788162]
19. Goldsworthy S, Zheng CY, McNair H, McGregor A. The potential for haptic touch technology to supplement human empathetic touch during radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020;51(4):S39-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.003]
20. Pokja T PPNI. Pedoman Standar Prosedur Operasional Keperawatan. Jakarta: Indonesian National Nurses Association 2021; [Link]
21. Ujiie H, Yamaguchi A, Gregor A, Chan H, Kato T, Hida Y, et al. Developing a virtual reality simulation system for preoperative planning of thoracoscopic thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(2):778-83. [Link] [DOI:10.21037/jtd-20-2197]
22. Schrepp M, Thomaschewski J, Hinderks A. Construction of a Benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). Int J Interact Multimedia Artificial Intelligence. 2017;4:40-4. [Link] [DOI:10.9781/ijimai.2017.445]
23. Sabukunze ID, Arakaza A. User experience analysis on mobile application design using user experience questionnaire. Indonesian J Inf Sys. 2021;4(1):15-26. [Link] [DOI:10.24002/ijis.v4i1.4646]
24. Hinderks A, Schrepp M, Domínguez Mayo FJ, Escalona MJ, Thomaschewski J. Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2019;65:38-44. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.csi.2019.01.007]
25. Bayram SB, Caliskan N. The use of virtual reality simulations in nursing education, and patient safety. In: Contemporary Topics in Patient Safety-Volume 1. London: IntechOpen; 2020. [Link]
26. Thi N, Phuong A, Thi H, Trang T, Duc NM, Nguyet TT, et al. Exploring learning strategies of nursing students at Hue university of medicine and pharmacy, Vietnam. J Problem Based Learn. 2020;7(2):82-93. [Link] [DOI:10.24313/jpbl.2020.00276]
27. McCarthy CJ, Uppot RN. Advances in virtual and augmented reality-exploring the role in health-care education. J Radiol Nurs. 2019;38(2):104-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jradnu.2019.01.008]
28. Vagg T, Morrissy D, McCarthy Y, McCarthy M, Tabirca S, Plant BJ. P229 improving undergraduate medical student education in cystic fibrosis using a locally developed cystic fibrosis-specific virtual reality tool. J Cystic Fibrosis. 2019;18:S121-2. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1569-1993(19)30522-3]
29. Saredakis D, Szpak A, Birckhead B, Keage HAD, Rizzo A, Loetscher T. Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:96. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096]
30. Koivisto JM, Niemi H, Multisilta J, Eriksson E. Nursing students' experiential learning processes using an online 3D simulation game. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2017;22(1):383-98. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10639-015-9453-x]
31. Gcawu SN, van Rooyen D. Clinical teaching practices of nurse educators: An integrative literature review. Health SA. 2022;27:1728. [Link] [DOI:10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1728]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.