Volume 10, Issue 4 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(4): 805-812 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohammadi E, Pournamdar Z, Vahedparast H, Kazemnejad A. Effect of the Continuity Self-Preservation Model on Compliance with the Care-treatment Regimen and Its Consequences in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (4) :805-812
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-65226-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-65226-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
3- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (523 Views)
Aims: Failure to comply with the treatment plan is a challenge and a problem to control chronic diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of the continuity self-preservation model on compliance with the care-treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental clinical trial study was performed on 80 patients with type 2 diabetes (intervention and control groups) admitted to a hospital in Zahedan, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. Questionnaires and blood samples were used as data-gathering methods. The intervention program was designed and implemented based on the self-preservation continuity model. The dependent variables were then assessed during a four-stage period. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in SPSS 9 software to analyze the data.
Findings: Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in the mean scores of compliance with treatment, quality of life, health belief, and mean glycosylated hemoglobin after the intervention between the two groups (p=0.001).
Conclusion: The self-preservation continuity model is effective in metabolic control and compliance with the treatment of diabetic patients.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental clinical trial study was performed on 80 patients with type 2 diabetes (intervention and control groups) admitted to a hospital in Zahedan, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. Questionnaires and blood samples were used as data-gathering methods. The intervention program was designed and implemented based on the self-preservation continuity model. The dependent variables were then assessed during a four-stage period. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in SPSS 9 software to analyze the data.
Findings: Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in the mean scores of compliance with treatment, quality of life, health belief, and mean glycosylated hemoglobin after the intervention between the two groups (p=0.001).
Conclusion: The self-preservation continuity model is effective in metabolic control and compliance with the treatment of diabetic patients.
Keywords: Self Care [MeSH], Diabetes Type 2 [MeSH], Treatment Adherence and Compliance [MeSH], Quality of Life [MeSH]
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Health Promotion Approaches
Received: 2022/09/24 | Accepted: 2022/12/1 | Published: 2022/12/13
Received: 2022/09/24 | Accepted: 2022/12/1 | Published: 2022/12/13
References
1. Khamseh ME, Sepanlou SG, Hashemi-Madani N, Joukar F, Mehrparvar AH, Faramarzi E, et al. Nationwide prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes and associated risk factors among Iranian adults: Analysis of data from Persian cohort study. Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(11):2921-38. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s13300-021-01152-5]
2. Sharma T, Kalra J, Dhasmana D, Basera H. Poor adherence to treatment: A major challenge in diabetes. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2014;15(1):26-9. [Link]
3. van Dulmen S, Sluijs E, van Dijk L, de Ridder D, Heerdink R, Bensing J. Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):55. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-7-55]
4. Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Russo JE, Walker EA. The patient-provider relationship: attachment theory and adherence to treatment in diabetes. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(1):29-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.1.29]
5. Sluijs E, Dulmen Sv, Dijk Lv, de Ridder D, Heerdink R, Bensing J. Patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta review. Nivel. 2006. [Link]
6. Vahedparast H. The process of concordance with care - treatment regimens in patients affected by chronic diseases and designing of promoting its model [Dissertation]. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2016. [Persian] [Link]
7. Zheng F, Liu S, Liu Y, Deng L. Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019:1073131. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2019/1073131]
8. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943-50. [Link] [DOI:10.2337/diacare.23.7.943]
9. Michels MJ, Coral MHC, Sakae TM, Damas TB, Furlanetto LM. Questionnaire of diabetes self-care activities: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of psychometric properties. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;54(7):644-51. [Portuguese] [Link] [DOI:10.1590/S0004-27302010000700009]
10. Roos AC, Baptista DR, de Miranda RC. Compliance with the treatment of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Demetra Food Nutr Health. 2015;10(2):329-47. [Link] [DOI:10.12957/demetra.2015.13990]
11. Claude JAJ. An application of health behaviour models to diabetic treatment adherence: A comparison of protection motivation theory and the theory of planned behaviour [Dissertation]. Canada: The University of Regina: 2011. [Link]
12. Anbari K, Ghanadi K, Kaviani M, Montazeri R. The self-care and its related factors in diabetic patients of khorramabad city. Yafteh. 2012;14(4):49-57. [Persian] [Link]
13. Chamany S, Walker EA, Schechter CB, Gonzalez JS, Davis NJ, Ortega FM, et al. Telephone intervention to improve diabetes control: a randomized trial in the New York City A1c Registry. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(6):832-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.016]
14. Mahmoud NM, yousef Mohammed N, Essa RM. The relationship between health belief model and compliance with therapeutic regimen among diabetic pregnant women. Int J for Res in Health Sci Nurs. 2018;4(2):40-63. [Link]
15. Sacco WP, Malone JI, Morrison AD, Friedman A, Wells K. Effect of a brief, regular telephone intervention by paraprofessionals for type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2009;32(4):349-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10865-009-9209-4]
16. Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Britton KD, Weinstock RS. The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(3):148-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1207/s15324796abm2703_2]
17. Ung SK. Role of cultural and psychological factors influencing diabetes treatment adherence [Dissertation]. Loma Linda, California, United States: Loma Linda University; 2017. [Link]
18. Wu SF. Effectiveness of self-management for persons with type 2 diabetes following the implementation of a self-efficacy enhancing intervention program in Taiwan [Dissertation]. Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2007. [Link]
19. Turan B, Osar Z, Damci T, Ilkova H. The role of coping with disease in adherence to treatment regimen and disease control in type 1 and insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2002;28(3):186-93. [Link]
20. Kanapathy J. Illness perception of Type 2 Diabetic patients in Malaysia [Dissertation]. London: City University London; 2015. [Link]
21. Kamradt M, Bozorgmehr K, Krisam J, Freund T, Kiel M, Qreini M, et al. Assessing self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany: validation of a German version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA-G). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):185. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12955-014-0185-1]
22. Lin C-Y, Lee T-Y, Sun Z-J, Yang Y-C, Wu J-S, Ou H-T. Development of diabetes-specific quality of life module to be in conjunction with the World Health Organization quality of life scale brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). Health Qual Life Outc. 2017;15(1):167. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0744-3]
23. Saffari M, Lin C-Y, O'Garo K, Koenig HG, Sanaeinasab H, Pakpour AH. Psychometric properties of Persian Diabetes-Mellitus Specific Quality of Life (DMQoL) questionnaire in a population-based sample of Iranians. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2019;39(1):218-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s13410-018-0648-8]
24. Morowaty Sharifabad M, Rouhani Tonekaboni N. Perceived severity and susceptibility of diabetes complications and its relation to self-care behaviors among diabetic patients. Armaghan-e-Danesh. 2007;12(3):59-68. [Persian] [Link]
25. Hashemi SM, Bouya S. Treatment adherence in diabetic patients: an important but forgotten issue. J Diabetes Nurs. 2018;6(1):341-51. [Persian] [Link]
26. Gholamaliei B, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Roshanaei G, Rezapour-Shahkolaei F. Medication adherence and its related factors in patients with type II diabetes. J Educ Community Health. 2016;2(4):3-12. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.21859/jech-02042]
27. Tanharo D, Ghods R, Pourrahimi M, Abdi M, Aghaei S, Vali N. Adherence to treatment in diabetic patients and its affecting factors. Pajouhan Sci J. 2018;17(1):37-44. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.21859/psj.17.1.37]
28. Harvey J, Lawson V. The importance of health belief models in determining self‐care behaviour in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009;26(1):5-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02628.x]
29. Hamadzadeh S, Ezatti Z, Abedsaeidi Z, Nasiri N. Coping styles and self-care behaviors among diabetic patients. Iran J Nurs (2008-5923). 2013;25(80):24-33. [Persian] [Link]
30. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SeH, Abu Nab'a RJ, Deleq MI, Enaia MI, Nassar SaM, et al. Influence of patients' disease knowledge and beliefs about medicines on medication adherence: findings from a cross-sectional survey among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):94. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-94]
31. Goli Roshan A, Hosseinkhani SN, Norouzadeh R. The relationship between health literacy of elderly diabetics and adherence to treatment, Babol, Iran, 2021. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2021;14(12):70-80. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.52547/qums.14.12.70]
32. Rezai Asl H, Pishgooi SAH, Alhani F. The effectiveness of "Family-Centered Empowerment Model" on the treatment adherence of patients with type II diabetes and heart disorder admitted to AJA Hospitals, during year 2015. Mil. Caring Sci J. 2017;4(1):58-69. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/mcs.4.1.58]
33. Wens J, Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A, Biot Y, Van Royen P. Educational interventions aiming at improving adherence to treatment recommendations in type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;79(3):377-88. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2007.06.006]
34. Smaje A, Weston‐Clark M, Raj R, Orlu M, Davis D, Rawle M. Factors associated with medication adherence in older patients: A systematic review. Aging Med. 2018;1(3):254-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/agm2.12045]
35. Macido A. A nurse-led inpatient diabetes self-management education and support program to improve patient knowledge and treatment adherence. J Health Educ Teach. 2019;10(1):1-10. [Link]
36. Farmer A, Hardeman W, Hughes D, Prevost AT, Kim Y, Craven A, et al. An explanatory randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led, consultation-based intervention to support patients with adherence to taking glucose lowering medication for type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(1):30. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-13-30]
37. Faramarzi M, Shamsi M, Khorsandi M, Almasi HA. The role of education underpinned by health belief model in promoting kidney care behaviors in type 2 diabetic patients. Iran J Evdocrinol Metabol. 2021;22(6):469-77. [Persian] [Link]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |