Volume 10, Issue 3 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(3): 433-441 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sklempe Kokic I, Barusic Z, Crnkovic Knezevic M, Benko Mestrovic S, Duvnjak I. Physical Activity and Health-Promoting Behaviours of Nurses and Physiotherapists: a Cross-Sectional Survey. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (3) :433-441
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-62111-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-62111-en.html
1- Faculty of Kinesiology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
2- Community Care Institution Jadranka Pluzaric, Osijek, Croatia
3- Department of Health Studies, College of Applied Sciences, Lavoslav Ruzicka in Vukovar, Vukovar, Croatia
4- Special Hospital for Lung Disease, Zagreb, Croatia
2- Community Care Institution Jadranka Pluzaric, Osijek, Croatia
3- Department of Health Studies, College of Applied Sciences, Lavoslav Ruzicka in Vukovar, Vukovar, Croatia
4- Special Hospital for Lung Disease, Zagreb, Croatia
Abstract: (1179 Views)
Aims: There are still limited data regarding the health-promoting behavior of healthcare workers in different work settings. This study aimed to investigate and compare health-promoting behavior including levels of physical activity and health-related quality of life among nurses and physiotherapists across different work settings.
Instrument & Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Croatia among a convenience sample of 253 physiotherapists and nurses by demographic and work characteristics, health-promoting lifestyle profile II, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form, and the new five-level version of EQ-5D questionnaire. Participants were compared by gender, profession, and work setting.
Findings: The only differences in the HPLP-II scores were found for the sub-scale health responsibility where female participants and those working in community care scored higher (p<0.001; p=0.038). Ratings of the overall health status were higher for male respondents (p=0.030). Male respondents accumulated higher levels of physical activity in the work and leisure domain as well as vigorous-intensity physical activity (p=0.034; p=0.001; p=0.004). Nurses accumulated higher levels of moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity (p=0.021; p=0.034). There was a positive relationship between the rating of the overall health status and levels of physical activity in the domain of leisure (p=0.047).
Conclusion: Nurses and physiotherapists reported high levels of physical activity, but relatively low levels of leisure-time physical activity. There is a positive relationship between leisure-time physical activity, health-related quality of life, and health-promoting behavior.
Instrument & Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Croatia among a convenience sample of 253 physiotherapists and nurses by demographic and work characteristics, health-promoting lifestyle profile II, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form, and the new five-level version of EQ-5D questionnaire. Participants were compared by gender, profession, and work setting.
Findings: The only differences in the HPLP-II scores were found for the sub-scale health responsibility where female participants and those working in community care scored higher (p<0.001; p=0.038). Ratings of the overall health status were higher for male respondents (p=0.030). Male respondents accumulated higher levels of physical activity in the work and leisure domain as well as vigorous-intensity physical activity (p=0.034; p=0.001; p=0.004). Nurses accumulated higher levels of moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity (p=0.021; p=0.034). There was a positive relationship between the rating of the overall health status and levels of physical activity in the domain of leisure (p=0.047).
Conclusion: Nurses and physiotherapists reported high levels of physical activity, but relatively low levels of leisure-time physical activity. There is a positive relationship between leisure-time physical activity, health-related quality of life, and health-promoting behavior.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Healthy Life Style
Received: 2022/05/9 | Accepted: 2022/07/21 | Published: 2022/08/10
Received: 2022/05/9 | Accepted: 2022/07/21 | Published: 2022/08/10
References
1. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2009. [Link]
2. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2010. [Link]
3. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. Washington: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018. [Link]
4. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126-31. [Link]
5. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987;36(2):76-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002]
6. World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2018. [Link]
7. Milosevic M, Golubic R, Mustajbegovic J, Doko Jelinic J, Janev HolcerN, Kern J. Regional pattern of physical inactivity in Croatia. Coll Antropol. 2009;33 suppl 1:35-8. [Link]
8. World Health Organization. WHO Global Plan of Action on Workers' Health (2008-2017): Baseline for Implementation Global Country Survey 2008/2009Executive Summary and Survey Findings. Geneva: World Health Organization Press2013 [cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from: [Link]
9. Black B, Marcoux BC, Stiller C, Qu X, Gellish R. Personal health behaviors and role-modeling attitudes of physical therapists and physical therapist students: A cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2012;92(11):1419-36. [Link] [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20110037]
10. Chevan J, Haskvitz EM. Do as I do: exercise habits of physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, and student physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2010;90(5):726-34. [Link] [DOI:10.2522/ptj.20090112]
11. Craig CL, Marshal, AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-95. [Link] [DOI:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB]
12. Pedisic Z, Jurakic D, Rakovac M, Hodak D, Dizdar D. Reliability of the croatian long version of the international physical activity questionnaire. Kinesiology. 2011;43:185-91. [Sažetak] [Link]
13. IPAQ Group. Guidelines for the data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire: short and long forms; 2005 [cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol [Link]
14. Al-Qahtani MF. Health-promoting lifestyle beaviors among nurses in private hospitals in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2015;90(1):29-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/01.EPX.0000461325.97703.8a]
15. Kurnat-Thoma E, El-Banna M, Oakcrum M, Tyroler J. Nurses' health promoting lifestyle behaviours in a community hospital. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;35:77-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.02.012]
16. Profis M, Simon-Tuval T. The influence of healthcare workers' occupation on health promoting lifestyle profile. Ind Health. 2016;54(5):439-47. [Link] [DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2015-0187]
17. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x]
18. Melnyk B, Hrabe DP, Szalacha LA. Relationship among work stress, job satisfaction, mental health, and healthy lifestyle behaviors among new graduate nurses attending the nurse athlete program: a call to action for nursing leaders. Nurs Adm Q. 2013;37(4):278-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3182a2f963]
19. Wright K. Alleviating stress in the workplace: advice for nurses. Nurs Stand. 2014;28(20):37-42. [Link] [DOI:10.7748/ns2014.01.28.20.37.e8391]
20. Can G, Ozdilli K, Ero, O, Unsar S, Tulek Z, Savaser S et al. Comparison of the health-promoting lifestyles of nursing and non-nursing students in Istanbul, Turkey. Nurs Health Sci. 2008;10(4):273-80. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00405.x]
21. Wei CN, Harada K, Ueda K, Fukumoto K, Minamoto K, Ueda A.(2012). Assessment of health-promoting lifestyle profile in Japanese university students. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17(3):222-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12199-011-0244-8]
22. Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45(6):401-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.017]
23. Vuillemin A, Boini S, Bertrais S, Tessier S, Oppert JM, Hercberg S, et al. Leisure time physical activity and health-related quality of life. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):562-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.01.006]
24. Jurakic D, Golubic A, Pedisic Z, Pori M. Patterns and correlates of physical activity among middle-aged employees: a population-based, cross-sectional study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014;27(3):487-97. [Link] [DOI:10.2478/s13382-014-0282-8]
25. Peplonska B, Bukowska A, Sobala W. Rotating night shift work and physical activity of nurses and midwives in the cross-sectional study in Lodz, Poland. Chronobio Int. 2014;31(10):1152-9. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/07420528.2014.957296]
26. Hansen J, Stevens RG. Case-control study of shift-work and breast cancer risk in Danish nurses: impact of shift systems. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(11):1722-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.005]
27. Fransson EI, Heikkilä K, Nyberg ST, Zins M, Westerlund H, Westerholm P, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for leisure-time physical inactivity: an individual-participant meta-analysis of up to 170,000 men and women: The IPD-Work Consortium. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(12):1078-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/aje/kws336]
28. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, Lima RC. Physical inactivity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35(11):1894-900. [Link] [DOI:10.1249/01.MSS.0000093615.33774.0E]
29. Jurakic D, Pedisic Z, Andrijasevic M. Physical activity of Croatian population: cross-sectional study using international physical activity questionnaire. Croat Med J. 2009;50(2):165-73. [Link] [DOI:10.3325/cmj.2009.50.165]
30. Kim HK, Kim MJ, Park CG, Kim HO. Gender differences in physical activity and its determinants in rural adults in Korea. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(5-6):876-83. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03054.x]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |