Volume 10, Issue 1 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(1): 175-182 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kachynska N, Prakhovnik N, Zemlyanska O, Ilchuk O, Kovtun A. Ecological Modernization of Enterprises: Environmental Risk Management. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (1) :175-182
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-59219-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-59219-en.html
1- Department of Labor Protection, Industrial and Civil Safety, Institute of Energy Saving and Energy Management, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract: (812 Views)
Aims: The aim was to analyze current ecological risk management systems, identify their shortcomings and implement solutions that will help avoid them, and study the ecological component when creating documents concerning the ecological modernization of enterprises.
Information & Methods: The present study investigates ecological and civil safety using logical analysis, comparative analysis, the formal-legal method, synthesis, deduction, and the analysis method of scientific literature.
Findings: The result of this paper is the identification of theoretical and practical foundations of ecological risk management systems, their effectiveness in preventing anthropogenic and ecological disasters, and the analysis of the regulatory framework for creating and implementing documentation to be used in the ecological modernization of enterprises.
Conclusion: The authors developed ecological risk management systems, eliminating shortcomings in their performance, introducing methods that will improve and make such systems more effective, as well as increasing the level of the ecological component during operations with documents that are cornerstones for ecological improvement of institutions and enterprises.
Information & Methods: The present study investigates ecological and civil safety using logical analysis, comparative analysis, the formal-legal method, synthesis, deduction, and the analysis method of scientific literature.
Findings: The result of this paper is the identification of theoretical and practical foundations of ecological risk management systems, their effectiveness in preventing anthropogenic and ecological disasters, and the analysis of the regulatory framework for creating and implementing documentation to be used in the ecological modernization of enterprises.
Conclusion: The authors developed ecological risk management systems, eliminating shortcomings in their performance, introducing methods that will improve and make such systems more effective, as well as increasing the level of the ecological component during operations with documents that are cornerstones for ecological improvement of institutions and enterprises.
Keywords: Anthropogenic Effect [MeSH], Safety Management [MeSH], Natural Resources [MeSH], Environment [MeSH], Sustainable Development [MeSH]
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Social Health
Received: 2022/01/2 | Accepted: 2022/03/2 | Published: 2022/04/10
Received: 2022/01/2 | Accepted: 2022/03/2 | Published: 2022/04/10
References
1. Kis IR. Strategic environmental risk management of transport enterprises. Bull Nat Tech Univ KhPI. 2021;2(4):24-33. [Link] [DOI:10.20998/2413-3000.2021.4.4]
2. Deineha I, Maslov A, Potryvaieva N, Berezhnytska U, Verbivska L, Koliadych O. Institutional environment tools for small and medium-sized enterprises development. Estud Econ Apl. 2021;39(3):4798. [Link] [DOI:10.25115/eea.v39i3.4798]
3. Kovtun AI, Zemlyanska OV, Kachynska NF. Application of active hyperspectral survey methods for remote monitoring of oil pipeline systems. Geoengineering. 2020;(2). [Ukrainian] [Link] [DOI:10.20535/2707-2096.2.2020.207382]
4. Bobkova A, Andrуeуeva N, Verbivska L, Kozlovtseva V, Velychko V. Environmental responsibility in the development of green entrepreneurship. Estud Econ Apl. 2020;38(4). [Link] [DOI:10.25115/eea.v38i4.4003]
5. Kazak R. Periodization of nature protection in Ukraine in the latter half of the 20th century: legal aspect. Espacios. 2018;39(19):1-7. [Link]
6. Chygryn OY, Karintseva OI, Kozlova DD, Kovaleva AV. HR management in the digital age: The main trends assessment and stakeholders. Mechan Econ Regul. 2019;(2):106-15. [Link] [DOI:10.21272/mer.2019.84.09]
7. Garafonova OI. The potential of enterprise changes: scientific-theoretical and methodological approaches to the definition. Bull Kherson Nat Techn Univ. 2019;3(70):234-8. [Link]
8. Zhylinska O, Sitnicki M, Vikulova A. Systematic assessment of innovative potential of a research university. Baltic J Econ Stud. 2019;5(2):38-44. [Link] [DOI:10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-2-38-44]
9. Khrutba VO, Barabash OV, Zyuzyun VI, Nevedrov DS. Use of biomonitoring to identify hazards in critical infrastructure projects. Bull Nat Tech Univ KhPI. 2020;(2):71-7. [Link] [DOI:10.20998/2413-3000.2020.2.10]
10. Proskurnina NV, Shtal TV, Slavuta OI, Serogina DO, Bohuslavskyi VV. Omnichannel Strategy of digital transformation of retail trade enterprise: From concept to implementation. Estud Econ Apl. 2021;39(6). [Link] [DOI:10.25115/eea.v39i6.5238]
11. Kazak R. Development of legal norms on biodiversity protection reflecting EU trends. Environ Polic Law. 2017;47(3-4):147-52. [Link] [DOI:10.3233/EPL-170032]
12. Ziabina Ye, Pimonenko T, Starchenko L. Energy efficiency of national economy: Social, economic and ecological indicators. SocioEcon Challenges. 2020;4(4):160-74. [Link] [DOI:10.21272/sec.4(4).160-174.2020]
13. Kazak R, Hotsuliak S. Features of sanitary legislation in ukraine in the mid-20th century: Historical overview. Eur J Sustain Dev. 2020;9(3):257-66. [Link] [DOI:10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p257]
14. Shtal TV, Uvarova A, Ostapenko II. Evaluation of the influence of external environmental factors on logistics activities: Case study of Ukrainian retail trade enterprises. J Environ Manag Tourism. 2018;9(7):1593-605. [Link] [DOI:10.14505//jemt.v9.7(31).22]
15. Bakulich OO, Kis IR. Green environmental risk management in the projects of transport enterprises using foresight methods. Coll Sci Works Cherkasy State Techn Univ. 2020;56:62-9. [Link]
16. Sineviciene L, Melnyk L, Kubatko O, Karintseva O, Lyulyov O. Economic and environmental convergence of transformation economy: The case of China. Probl Perspect Manag. 2019;(3):233-41. [Link] [DOI:10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.19]
17. Portukhay O, Lyko S, Mudrak O, Mudrak H, Lohvynenko I. Agroecological bases of sustainable development strategy for the rural united territorial communities of the western Polissya region. Sci Horiz. 2021;24(6):50-61. [Link] [DOI:10.48077/scihor.24(6).2021.50-61]
18. Shvets M, Markov F, Fitisov A, Didenko P. Analysis of financial and economic activity of state forest enterprises in the conditions of economic and ecological crisis. Sci Horiz. 2020;6:92-100. [Link] [DOI:10.33249/2663-2144-2020-91-6-92-100]
19. Ajevskis V, Vitola K. A convergence model of the term structure of interest rates. Rev Finance. 2010;14(4):727-47. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/rof/rfn030]
20. Zhumalina AK, Bekmukhambetov EZ, Tusupkaliev BT, Zharlikasinova MB. Development of scientifically justified proposals on the prevention and treatment of environmentally determined constitutional growth delay in children in the West Kazakhstan region. Environ Geochem Health. 2019;41(3):1251-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10653-018-0210-0]
21. Lutkovska S. Methodical approaches to evaluation of the processes of modernization of the environmental sustainable system. Sci Horiz. 2020;2:111-8. [Link] [DOI:10.33249/2663-2144-2020-87-02-111-118]
22. Strapchuk SI. Level of ecological and economic diversification: A methodology for assessing the sustainability of agricultural enterprises. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univ Ser Econ. 2021;8(2):101-7. [Link] [DOI:10.52566/msu-econ.8(2).2021.101-107]
23. Prokopenko O, Miśkiewicz R. Perception of "green shipping" in the contemporary conditions. Entrepreneur Sustain Issues. 2020;8(2):269-84. [Link] [DOI:10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(16)]
24. Tiurina A, Kapelista I, Omelchenko A, Obykhod H, Pavliuk S. Sustainable economic development of ukraine through the agro-sector growth. Sci Horiz. 2021;24(12):92-101. [Link] [DOI:10.48077/scihor.24(12).2021.92-101]
25. Zachko OB, Kobylkin DS, Golovaty RR. Models of infrastructure projects safety management at the planning stage. Bull Nat Tech Univ KhPI. 2019;2(1327):43-9. [Link]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |