Volume 9, Issue 4 (2021)
Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(4): 403-410 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Estebsari F, Rahimi Khalifeh Kandi Z, Nasiri M, Moradi Fath M, Mostafaei D. Is Tehran an Age-Friendly City?; Infrastructures Criteria Speech. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (4) :403-410
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-52395-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-52395-en.html
1- Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Education, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , tarla1367@yahoo.com
3- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Education, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , tarla1367@yahoo.com
3- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1206 Views)
Aims: One of the most common problems in the world is the growing aging population. The present study was examined the age-friendly city of Tehran based on indicators from the elders perspective
Instrument & Methods: This cross-sectional study was examined four indicators of the age-friendly city of Tehran from the perspective of the elderly (n=418) in 2018. The data collection tool was the World Health Organization (WHO)’s questionnaire of age-friendly city indicators: Social Participation, Civic-Participation and Employment, Respect and Social Inclusion, and the Communication and Information index. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18 on the collected data, assuming a significance level of <0.05.
Findings: The mean age of the elderly was 66.86±6.31 years. Comparing the means of the age-friendly city indicators revealed the social participation index mean of 35.0, the civic participation and employment index mean of 18.9, respect and social inclusion mean of 18.2, and the communication and information mean of 24.5.
Conclusion: Tehran metropolitan is only able to fulfill the basic needs of the elderly and is far from being the ideal situation and cannot achieve active aging for its people.
Instrument & Methods: This cross-sectional study was examined four indicators of the age-friendly city of Tehran from the perspective of the elderly (n=418) in 2018. The data collection tool was the World Health Organization (WHO)’s questionnaire of age-friendly city indicators: Social Participation, Civic-Participation and Employment, Respect and Social Inclusion, and the Communication and Information index. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18 on the collected data, assuming a significance level of <0.05.
Findings: The mean age of the elderly was 66.86±6.31 years. Comparing the means of the age-friendly city indicators revealed the social participation index mean of 35.0, the civic participation and employment index mean of 18.9, respect and social inclusion mean of 18.2, and the communication and information mean of 24.5.
Conclusion: Tehran metropolitan is only able to fulfill the basic needs of the elderly and is far from being the ideal situation and cannot achieve active aging for its people.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Promotion Setting
Received: 2021/05/9 | Accepted: 2021/05/27 | Published: 2021/11/12
Received: 2021/05/9 | Accepted: 2021/05/27 | Published: 2021/11/12
References
1. World health organization. Global age-friendly cities: A guide [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43755. [Link]
2. Taraghi Z, Ilali ES. A comparison of older adults' and managers' attitudes towards age-friendly city indexes. SALMAND. 2018;13(2):236-49. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.32598/sija.13.2.236]
3. United nations publications. World population prospects: The 2015 Revision. New York: United Nations; 2016. [Link]
4. Estebsari F, Taghdisi MH, Foroushani AR, Ardebili HE, Shojaeizadeh D. An educational program based on the successful aging approach on health-promoting behaviors in the elderly: A clinical trial study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(4):16314. [Link] [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.16314] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Rahimi Foroushani A, Estebsari F, Mostafaei D, Ardebili HE, Shojaeizadeh D, Dastoorpour M, et al. The effect of health promoting intervention on healthy lifestyle and social support in elders: a clinical trial study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(8):18399. [Link] [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.18399] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Statistical center of Iran. Population and housing census in 1395 [Internet]. Tehran: Statistical Center of Iran; 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Population-and-Housing-Censuses. [Persian] [Link]
7. Adib Roshan F, Talebpour M, Peymanizad H, Purazat AA. Identify the characteristics of the elderly-friendly city in Iran 2050. J Future Cities Vis. 2020;1(2):51-61. [Persian] [Link]
8. Zarghani SH, Kharazmi OA, Johari L. Evaluating Spatial - Physical indictors in Mashhad To become age-friendly city. Geogr Terr Spat Arrange. 2015;5(15):177-96. [Persian] [Link]
9. Taghdisi MH, Estebsari F, Rahimi Foroushani A, Eftekhar Ardebili H, Shojaeizadeh D, Dastoorpoor M, et al. The educational program based on the successful aging approach in elders health-promoting behaviors: A clinical trial study. Razi J Med Sci. 2014;21(125):26-36. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.16314]
10. World health organization. Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. [Link]
11. Mendoza-Ruvalcaba NM, Arias-Merino ED. I am active: Effects of a program to promote active aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:829-37. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/CIA.S79511] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Buffel T, Phillipson C, Scharf T. Ageing in urban environments: Developing 'age-friendly'cities. Crit Soc Policy. 2012;32(4):597-617. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0261018311430457]
13. Plouffe L, Kalache A. Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. J Urban Health. 2010;87(5):733-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Zhang X, Warner ME, Wethington E. Can age-friendly planning promote equity in community health across the rural-urban divide in the US. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1275. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041275] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Buffel T, Handler S, Philipson C. Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective. Bristol: Policy Press; 2018. [Link] [DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447331315.001.0001]
16. World health organization. WHO global network of age-friendly cities and communities [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organizayion; 2009 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-ALC-18.4. [Link]
17. Lui CW, Everingham JA, Warburton J, Cuthill M, Bartlett H. What makes a community age‐friendly: A review of international literature. Australas J Ageing. 2009;28(3):116-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x] [PMID]
18. Nemati D, Aghabakhshi H. Tehran as a age friendly city, fist step in becoming seniors capital city. Soc Res. 2014;6(18):15-44. [Persian] [Link]
19. Shariat F, Moradi F, Ghahramani R. Study of social, cultural, economic, well-being, and urbal structure needs of Tehran seniors association members. SALMAND. 2015;10(3):8-25. [Persian] [Link]
20. Sharqi A, Zarghami E, Olfat M, Kousalari FS. Evaluating status of global indices of age-friendly city in Tehran metropolis (AFC). Architect Civil Engin Environ. 2016;9(3):35-51. [Link] [DOI:10.21307/acee-2016-034]
21. Polco. Community assessment survey for older adults [Internet]. Denver: Polco; 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: https://info.polco.us/community-assessment-survey-for-older-adults. [Link]
22. Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Hajiloo F, Samany NN. A web-based public participation GIS for assessing the age-friendliness of cities: A case study in Tehran, Iran. Cities. 2019;95:102471. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102471]
23. Yousefi H, Sahzabi AY, Masih M, Ghaleh S, Mirzaaghabeik M. Urban parks prioritization concerning the age-friendly criteria in Sari northern Iran. Int J Occup Hyg. 2016;8(2):116-23. [Persian] [Link]
24. Zur B, Laliberte Rudman D. WHO age friendly cities: Enacting societal transformation through enabling occupation. J Occup Sci. 2013;20(4):370-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/14427591.2013.805456]
25. Wanchai A, Phrompayak D. Social participation types and benefits on health outcomes for elder people: A systematic review. Ageing Int. 2019;44(3):223-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12126-018-9338-6]
26. Lu L, Kao SF, Hsieh YH. Positive attitudes toward older people and well-being among Chinese community older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2010;29(5):622-39. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0733464809343289]
27. Gilmour H. Social participation and the health and well-being of Canadian seniors. Health Rep. 2012;23(4):23-32. [Link]
28. Lee HY, Jang SN, Lee S, Cho SI, Park EO. The relationship between social participation and self-rated health by sex and age: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(7):1042-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.05.007] [PMID]
29. Lee KH, Kim S. Development of age-friendly city indicators in South Korea. Urban Des Int. 2020;25(1):1-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/s41289-019-00078-6]
30. Fatmah F, Dewi VP, Priotomo Y. Developing age-friendly city readiness: A case study from Depok city, Indonesia. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:2050312119852510. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2050312119852510] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. North MS. A GATE to understanding older workers: Generation, age, tenure, experience. Acad Manag Ann. 2019;13(2):414-43. [Link] [DOI:10.5465/annals.2017.0125]
32. Schwingel A, Niti MM, Tang C, Ng TP. Continued work employment and volunteerism and mental well-being of older adults: Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):531-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ageing/afp089] [PMID]
33. Masud J, Hamid TA. Economic hardship among elderly and its consequences toward cognitive status. Arch Bus Res. 2017;5(8). [Link] [DOI:10.14738/abr.58.3573]
34. Assawamaitree S, Hongsranagon P. The association between the perception of age-friendly city features and the mental health status of the elderly in photaram district, Ratchaburi province, Thailand. J Health Res. 2017;31(Suppl 2):137-42. [Link]
35. Estebsari F, RahimiKhalifehKandi Z, Estebsari K, Mostafaei D. Elderly friendly city concepts and indicators. J Health Educ Health Promot. 2020;8(1):5-9. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/ijhehp.8.1.5]
36. Alfadel A. Social activity and health: Studying elderly adults' perspective upon social life and health in northern Sweden [dissertation]. Umeå: Umeå University; 2017. [Link]
37. Tinker A, Ginn J. An Age Friendly City -how far has London come?. London: King's College London; 2015. [Link]
38. Rockmann R, Gewald H. Elderly People in e-health: Who are they. Proc Computer Sci. 2015;63:505-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.376]
39. Marston HR, Van Hoof J. Who doesn't think about technology when designing urban environments for older people? a case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO's age-friendly cities model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3525. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16193525] [PMID] [PMCID]
40. Flores R, Caballer A, Alarcon A. Evaluation of an age-friendly city and its effect on life satisfaction: A two-stage study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):5073. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16245073] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |