Volume 8, Issue 3 (2020)
Health Educ Health Promot 2020, 8(3): 149-153 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
MohseniPouya H, Jannati Y, Naghibi S, Yazdani-Charati J. Factors Affecting for Lifestyle Adoption in Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Health Educ Health Promot 2020; 8 (3) :149-153
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-43933-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-43933-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran , hosseinmohsenipouya@gmail.com
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3- “Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health” and “Health Sciences Research Center”, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3- “Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health” and “Health Sciences Research Center”, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract: (1648 Views)
Aims: Epidemiological transition of acute and infectious diseases to non-communicable ones, aging population, together with rapid lifestyle changes all have given rise to prevalence rate of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Thus, it is of utmost importance to reflect on lifestyles, especially in this period. The main purpose of the present study was to assess lifestyle in patients affected with myocardial infarction (MI).
Instruments & Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study examining health-related lifestyle behaviors in patients with MI in 2019. To this end, a total number of 176 patients were selected using purposive and convenience sampling methods. The research instrument was also the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) as a standardized self-report questionnaire. The data analyzed using IBM SPSS 22 and the generalized linear models were used. Moreover, coefficient at a significance level less than 0.05.
Findings: The results of Wilks’ lambda distribution revealed that the effect of gender on the linear combination of the dependent variable (i.e. lifestyle) was significant and 11.4% of changes in this variable had resulted from variation in gender. Besides, the results demonstrated that health responsibility scores in men were on average 2.703 lower than those obtained by women. This relationship was also significant and its effect size was by 3.3% (p= 0.016).
Conclusions: It was concluded that the concept of lifestyle can be an analysis tool to better understand differences between genders, as an effective variable in adopting a healthy lifestyle, especially in patients suffering from MI.
Instruments & Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study examining health-related lifestyle behaviors in patients with MI in 2019. To this end, a total number of 176 patients were selected using purposive and convenience sampling methods. The research instrument was also the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) as a standardized self-report questionnaire. The data analyzed using IBM SPSS 22 and the generalized linear models were used. Moreover, coefficient at a significance level less than 0.05.
Findings: The results of Wilks’ lambda distribution revealed that the effect of gender on the linear combination of the dependent variable (i.e. lifestyle) was significant and 11.4% of changes in this variable had resulted from variation in gender. Besides, the results demonstrated that health responsibility scores in men were on average 2.703 lower than those obtained by women. This relationship was also significant and its effect size was by 3.3% (p= 0.016).
Conclusions: It was concluded that the concept of lifestyle can be an analysis tool to better understand differences between genders, as an effective variable in adopting a healthy lifestyle, especially in patients suffering from MI.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Healthy Life Style
Received: 2020/07/5 | Accepted: 2020/08/17 | Published: 2020/09/20
Received: 2020/07/5 | Accepted: 2020/08/17 | Published: 2020/09/20
References
1. Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(13):256. [Link] [DOI:10.21037/atm.2016.06.33]
2. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. [Link]
3. Oldridge N, Höfer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H, et al. Development of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(1):90-7.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312450545 [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2047487312450544]
4. Kuan G, Kueh YC, Abdullah N, Tai EL. Psychometric properties of the health-promoting lifestyle profile II: Cross-cultural validation of the Malay language version. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):751. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-019-7109-2]
5. Lie I, Bunch EH, Smeby NA, Arnesen H, Hamilton G. Patients' experiences with symptoms and needs in the early rehabilitation phase after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;11(1):14-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.09.004]
6. Jing W, Willis R, Feng Z. Factors influencing quality of life of elderly people with dementia and care implications: A systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;66:23-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2016.04.009]
7. Wolever RQ, Caldwell KL, McKernan LC, Hillinger MG. Integrative medicine strategies for changing health behaviors: Support for primary care. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2017;44(2):229-45. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pop.2017.02.007]
8. Yandarani M, Mansourian M, Ansarifar A, Mohamadi F, Safari O, Yousefi J, et al. Lifestyle and hypertension in rural population of Tangestan town, Iran. Chronic Dis J. 2019;7(4):226-32. [Link]
9. Manavifar M, Asaei E. Evaluation the lifestyle of patients with hypertension who reffered to heart clinices dependent on Islamic azad university of mashhad. Razi J Med Sci. 2019;26(3):51-8. [Persian] [Link]
10. Mohseni Pouya H, Hajimiri K, Esmaeili Shahmirzadi S, Golshani S, Amrei H, Seifi Makrani A. Relationship between health promoting behaviors and severity of coronary artery stenosis in angiography department in Mazandaran Heart Center. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2015;25(130):19-29. [Link]
11. Mansoorian M, Qorbani M, Shafieyan N, Asayesh H, Shafieyan Z, Maghsodloo D. Association between life style and hypertension in rural population of Gorgan. J Health Promot Manag. 2012;1(2):23-8. [Persian] [Link]
12. Díaz-Gutiérrez J, Ruiz-Canela M, Gea A, Fernández-Montero A, Martínez-González MÁ. Association between a healthy lifestyle score and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the SUN cohort. Revista Española de Cardiología. 2018;71(12):1001-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2017.10.038]
13. Leifheit-Limson EC, Reid KJ, Kasl SV, Lin H, Jones PG, Buchanan DM, et al. The role of social support in health status and depressive symptoms after acute myocardial infarction: evidence for a stronger relationship among women. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):143-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.899815]
14. Abedi HA, Nazari H, Abdeyazdan GH, Bik Mohammadi S. A survey on the the lifestyle of the heart desease patients after discharge from hospital in urmia seyyed alshohada in 2012. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2014;11(12):944-54. [Persian] [Link]
15. Kwaśniewska M, Kaczmarczyk-Chałas K, Pikala M, Kozakiewicz K, Pająk A, Tykarski A, et al. Socio-demographic and lifestyle correlates of commuting activity in Poland. Prev Med. 2010;50(5-6):257-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.011]
16. Babak A, Davari S, Aghdak P, Pirhaji O. Assessment of healthy lifestyle among elderly in Isfahan, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2011;29(149):1-11. [Link]
17. Azadbakht M, Garmaroodi G, Taheri Tanjani P, Sahaf R, Shojaeizade D, Gheisvandi E. Health promoting self-care behaviors and its related factors in elderly: Application of health belief model. J Educ Community Health. 2014;1(2):20-9. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.20286/jech-010220]
18. Baroogh N, Teimouri F, Saffari M, Sadeh SH, Mehran A. Hypertension and lifestyle in 24-65 year old people in Qazvin Kosar region in 2007. PAJOOHANDEH. 2010;15(5):193-8. [Persian] [Link]
19. Sargazi M, Salehi S, Naji SA. A study on the health promoting behaviors regarding hospitalized older adults' health in Zahedan. J Zabol Univ Med Sci Health Serv. 2012;4(2):73-84. [Link]
20. Solhi M, Rezazadeh A, Azam K, Khoushemehri G. Application of theory of planned behavior in prediction of health responsibility, spiritual health and interpersonal relations in high school girl students in Tabriz. Razi J Med Sci. 2014;21(121):9-17. [Persian] [Link]
21. Purafkari N. Investigating factors affecting social health in Paveh City. Islam Azad Univ J Soc Sci Shoshtar. 2012;6(18):41-60. [Persian] [Link]
22. Fuhrer R, Stansfeld SA. How gender affects patterns of social relations and their impact on health: A comparison of one or multiple sources of support from "close persons". Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(5):811-25. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00111-3]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |