Volume 12, Issue 4 (2024)
Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(4): 605-610 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Esmaeelzadeh M, Pirani M, Bahrami M, Soleimanian Asl M, Sabeghi H. Health-Promoting Hospitals’ Standards and Their Correlation with Nurses’ Caring Behaviors. Health Educ Health Promot 2024; 12 (4) :605-610
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-77782-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-77782-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2- Hashemi Nezhad Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2- Hashemi Nezhad Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 602 kb]
(292 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (314 Views)
Full-Text: (22 Views)
Introduction
Hospitals are facing new challenges due to global changes, and governments are prioritizing health as a major concern [1, 2]. Hospitals need to improve their efficiency in resource utilization amidst increasing demands for treatment and care [3]. Therefore, there is a focus on reforming health services, promoting health, and preventing disease.
The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced health-promoting hospitals (HPHs) as an effective strategy for transforming healthcare services [3]. The HPHs movement, initiated in 1986, aims to improve the health of patients, hospital employees, and the community [4]. Hospitals play a crucial role in the healthcare system, and adopting a health promotion approach is essential for their future success [5]. The goal of HPHs is to enhance the quality of healthcare services through health promotion, disease prevention, and treatment [6]. This involves empowering patients, promoting prevention among hospital personnel, and fostering collaboration between hospitals and society [7].
Hospitals must prioritize principles and standards to institutionalize prevention and health promotion [5]. The standards for HPHs include organizational commitment, service access, people-centered care, healthy workplaces and settings, and the promotion of health in society [8]. Implementing these standards may provide benefits, such as improved patient quality of life, reduced complications and hospitalizations, lower costs, enhanced staff and client health, and increased work quality [9].
Nursing performance can serve as an evaluation indicator for hospitals [10]. In other words, nursing quality is a key factor in assessing medical service quality and reflects the overall quality level of a hospital [11]. Furthermore, one of the prominent characteristics of setting standards in the healthcare system is ensuring the delivery of quality care to patients. Leininger has defined care as a supportive process aimed at correcting or improving human conditions or the way of life for patients with hidden or obvious needs [12]. Care is the essence and foundation of the nursing profession [13]. Quality care is a critical component of healthcare standards, with nurses' caring behaviors playing a vital role [14, 15]. These behaviors, encompassing physical, emotional, and psychological care, are designed to enhance patient well-being and reduce the duration of illness [16]. Caring behaviors exhibited by nurses include targeted practices and attitudes that alleviate patient discomfort, meet their needs, prioritize their comfort and safety, and demonstrate professional competence [17, 18]. Nurses in professional roles must exhibit caring behaviors while delivering nursing care. A lack of compassionate caring behaviors can harm patients, nurses, and hospital staff, resulting in a decline in hospital visitors, reduced financial income, and a negative impact on the hospital as it undermines patients' trust [19]. Factors, such as workload, lack of time, and the nursing work environment—including working hours, shifts, and job satisfaction—can influence the performance of caring behaviors [20-22].
Considering the role of caring behaviors in achieving a high-quality health system [23] and the impact of the nursing work environment on these behaviors, adherence to HPH standards may be associated with nurses' caring behaviors.
The implementation of health promotion activities is essential for hospitals; however, the current provision of these services in Iranian hospitals remains unclear [3]. Thus, it is necessary to assess the level of adherence to HPH standards by administrators [24]. Furthermore, understanding the relationship between adherence to these standards and nurses’ caring behaviors can offer valuable insights for researchers and healthcare managers. Nonetheless, there is a lack of studies investigating this relationship. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adherence to the standards of HPHs and nurses’ caring behaviors.
Instrument and Methods
Study design, Setting, and sample
This descriptive correlational study was conducted in 2021 in Birjand, located in the southeast of Iran. The study population included all nurses working in hospitals affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Nurses were selected using convenience sampling. In the absence of similar studies, the sample size was calculated to be 228 individuals using Cochran's formula (small population mode) with a 95% confidence interval, a precision level of 0.05, an estimated proportion of 0.5, and a 10% attrition rate.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were having at least a bachelor's degree in nursing, at least one year of clinical work experience, and willingness to participate in the study. Nurses who did not fully complete the questionnaires were excluded from the study.
Measurements/tools
The research tools comprised a demographic characteristics checklist (age, sex, level of education, marital status, etc.), the Caring Behavior Inventory (CBI-42), and the WHO’s Health Promotion Standards Adherence Scale.
Caring behavior was measured using the CBI-42, designed by Wolf et al. [25]. The CBI-42 consists of 42 items divided into five main dimensions, including respectful deference to others (12 items), assurance of human presence (12 items), positive connectedness (nine items), professional knowledge and skill (five items), and attentiveness to the other’s experience (four items). Each item is rated on a six-point Likert scale, ranging from "never" (one) to "always" (six). The minimum possible score for this questionnaire is 42, and the maximum is 252, with higher scores indicating more significant caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective. The questionnaire does not include reverse scoring. The reliability (α=0.85) and validity (face and content) of the CBI-42 were evaluated and confirmed in the study by Rafiei et al. [26]. In this study, the reliability of the inventory was assessed using the internal consistency method, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to be 0.97.
To assess adherence to HPH standards, the WHO’s Health Promotion Standards Adherence Scale was utilized. This scale consists of 68 questions covering five key dimensions of HPHs, including management policy (17 items), patient evaluation (nine items), patient information and interventions (seven items), creating a healthy work environment (16 items), and continuity and cooperation (19 items). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "No" (zero) to "Yes" (three). The minimum possible score on the questionnaire is zero, and the maximum is 201, with higher scores indicating better compliance with health promotion standards. The validity and reliability of the tool were tested by Groene et al. in 38 hospitals across eight member countries of the International Network of HPHs. The tool was validated, and Cronbach’s α coefficient was reported to range from 0.77 to 0.88 [27]. In this study, we assessed the reliability of the scale using the internal consistency method and obtained a Cronbach's alpha value exceeding 0.80.
Data collection
Data collection was carried out through direct visits to the selected hospitals during three work shifts. Paper questionnaires were completed by nurses who met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26. Frequency distribution tables were used for qualitative variables, while numerical measures, such as minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables, including caring behavior. Spearman's correlation coefficient was employed to assess the potential correlation between caring behavior and adherence to the HPH standards. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Findings
Three hospitals with 228 nurses were evaluated in this study (Table 1). The majority of the nurses were women (53.1%) and married (71.1%). In terms of education, 217 participants (95.2%) held a bachelor's degree, while 11 participants (4.8%) had a master's degree. Most nurses (36.4%) were employed temporarily. The average work experience of the nurses was 8.17±6.15 years (range: 1-25 years), and their average age was 31.15±6.65 years (range: 20-52 years) (Table 2).
Table 1. The examined hospitals
Table 2. Frequency of sociodemographic characteristics of nurses
From the nurses’ perspective, the average total adherence score to the standards of HPH was 130.74±25.68. Regarding the level of compliance with the standards of HPH, continuity and cooperation had the highest average score (36.96±8.16), while patient information and interventions had the lowest average score (14.04±2.90). In terms of the dimensions of nurses’ caring behaviors, assurance of human presence had the highest average score (62.03±9.04), while attention to others’ experiences had the lowest average score (20.69±3.44). Additionally, the overall caring behavior score from the nurses’ perspective was 215.52±29.25 (Table 3).
Table 3. Mean adherence level to the standards of health-promoting hospitals and the quality of caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective
The results of Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive relationship between the total score of HPH standards and the total score of caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective (p<0.001, r=0.49). Similarly, a significant positive relationship was observed between all dimensions of HPH standards and all dimensions of caring behaviors from the nurses' point of view (p<0.001; Table 4).
Table 4. Bivariate correlations between health-promoting hospitals’ standards and Caring Behavior Inventory (CBI) subscales
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adherence to HPH standards and nurses’ caring behaviors. While the compliance level appeared relatively favorable in this study, a comparison on a larger scale revealed that it falls short of the goals set by the HPH standards. For example, a review by Hamidi et al. demonstrated that adherence to the HPH standards in Iranian hospitals is weak [28]. Other studies conducted in different countries show higher levels of compliance with these standards [29]. Currently, only seven health centers in Iran have joined HPH programs [30]. These weaknesses and discrepancies may result from the treatment-oriented management policies of hospitals in Iran, where promoting a healthy lifestyle is not prioritized.
In our study, nurses rated continuity in treatment and cooperation as the highest-scoring areas. A similar study by Javan Biparva et al. also found that nurses perceive high compliance with HPH standards, with continuity in treatment and cooperation receiving the highest score [31]. However, Pezeshki et al. reported that patient information and therapeutic interventions have the highest score while promoting a healthy work environment receives the lowest score [32]. Similarly, Seif Rabiei et al. found that patient information and therapeutic interventions score the highest while promoting a healthy work environment score the lowest [33]. These variations may be attributed to differences in the planning and management policies of hospitals regarding the implementation of health promotion programs across different geographical areas in Iran.
In this research, nurses perceived their caring behavior as high, with a score of 215 out of 252. This finding aligns with other studies showing that nurses have a positive perception of their caring behaviors [34, 35]. Studies conducted in other countries, including China, also support the idea that nurses prioritize and excel in providing quality care [36]. This global focus on caring behavior highlights its significance in the field of nursing.
In our study, nurses demonstrated higher levels of caring behavior in terms of respecting others and ensuring human presence. This emphasizes the importance of humanistic practice in nursing [37] and reinforces the value of altruism for effective patient care [38]. Surprisingly, the dimensions of professional knowledge and skill, as well as attention to other experiences, received lower average scores from the nurses’ perspectives. This suggests a potential neglect of the clinical competence aspect of caring behavior [39]. Similar findings were observed in other studies, where the highest scores are found in the "assurance of human presence" subscale, and the lowest scores are found in the "knowledge and skill" subscale [40-42]. The differences in the mean scores for the components of nursing behavior could be attributed to variations in methodologies, nurse characteristics, research environments, or the tools and scales used. Despite the favorable behavior observed in the nurses in this study, it remains essential for nurses to pay more attention to patients' emotional needs during the caring process and to focus more on behaviors that are more objective and observable by patients.
According to the results, there was a positive and meaningful correlation between all the different dimensions of the HPH standards and the dimensions of caring behavior from the nurses' perspective. Similarly, Naderi et al. demonstrated that the implementation of health promotion standards in the hospital they studied is able to improve many important care indicators [1]. Cho & Han found that a positive and supportive work environment is associated with better health-promoting behaviors and higher nursing performance quality [43]. Putra et al. identified a positive correlation between job satisfaction and the caring behaviors of nurses, particularly in areas, such as supervision, potential rewards, colleagues, and the nature of work [22]. Azizi-Fini et al. also report a positive and significant correlation between nurses' caring behaviors and patient satisfaction, suggesting that these behaviors can enhance the quality of patient care [44].
In terms of the limitations of the research, the current study is based on correlation analysis; therefore, interpreting the results as cause-and-effect relationships would not be entirely realistic. Additionally, this research was conducted among nurses, so caution should be exercised when generalizing the findings to other populations. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect data in this study, which introduces certain limitations. In this type of questionnaire, there is a possibility that respondents may answer in a way that aligns with what they believe is expected, rather than how they actually behave. Furthermore, the large number of questions can lead to errors in self-reporting, which may affect the research results.
Conclusion
Hospitals enhance nurses' caring behavior by adhering to HPH standards and fostering a positive work environment with improved inter-professional relationships.
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the Deputyship for Research at Birjand University of Medical Sciences for facilitating this study, as well as all the nurses who participated in this research.
Ethical Permissions: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences under the code BUMS.REC.1400.176. To protect the participants' identities, the names of the hospitals were replaced with the English letters A, B, and C. Furthermore, participation in this study was voluntary, and the questionnaires were completed at the participants' discretion, with their informed written consent.
Conflicts of Interests: The authors declared no conflicts of interests.
Authors' Contribution: Esmaeelzadeh M (First Author), Introduction Writer/Methodologist/Main Researcher/Discussion Writer/Statistical Analyst (35%); Pirani M (Second Author), Introduction Writer/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer (15%); Bahrami M (Third Author), Methodologist/Assistant Researcher/Statistical Analyst (10%); Soleimanian Asl M (Fourth Author), Introduction Writer/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer (10%); Sabeghi H (Fifth Author), Methodologist/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer/Statistical Analyst (30%)
Funding/Support: No financial support was received for this article.
Hospitals are facing new challenges due to global changes, and governments are prioritizing health as a major concern [1, 2]. Hospitals need to improve their efficiency in resource utilization amidst increasing demands for treatment and care [3]. Therefore, there is a focus on reforming health services, promoting health, and preventing disease.
The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced health-promoting hospitals (HPHs) as an effective strategy for transforming healthcare services [3]. The HPHs movement, initiated in 1986, aims to improve the health of patients, hospital employees, and the community [4]. Hospitals play a crucial role in the healthcare system, and adopting a health promotion approach is essential for their future success [5]. The goal of HPHs is to enhance the quality of healthcare services through health promotion, disease prevention, and treatment [6]. This involves empowering patients, promoting prevention among hospital personnel, and fostering collaboration between hospitals and society [7].
Hospitals must prioritize principles and standards to institutionalize prevention and health promotion [5]. The standards for HPHs include organizational commitment, service access, people-centered care, healthy workplaces and settings, and the promotion of health in society [8]. Implementing these standards may provide benefits, such as improved patient quality of life, reduced complications and hospitalizations, lower costs, enhanced staff and client health, and increased work quality [9].
Nursing performance can serve as an evaluation indicator for hospitals [10]. In other words, nursing quality is a key factor in assessing medical service quality and reflects the overall quality level of a hospital [11]. Furthermore, one of the prominent characteristics of setting standards in the healthcare system is ensuring the delivery of quality care to patients. Leininger has defined care as a supportive process aimed at correcting or improving human conditions or the way of life for patients with hidden or obvious needs [12]. Care is the essence and foundation of the nursing profession [13]. Quality care is a critical component of healthcare standards, with nurses' caring behaviors playing a vital role [14, 15]. These behaviors, encompassing physical, emotional, and psychological care, are designed to enhance patient well-being and reduce the duration of illness [16]. Caring behaviors exhibited by nurses include targeted practices and attitudes that alleviate patient discomfort, meet their needs, prioritize their comfort and safety, and demonstrate professional competence [17, 18]. Nurses in professional roles must exhibit caring behaviors while delivering nursing care. A lack of compassionate caring behaviors can harm patients, nurses, and hospital staff, resulting in a decline in hospital visitors, reduced financial income, and a negative impact on the hospital as it undermines patients' trust [19]. Factors, such as workload, lack of time, and the nursing work environment—including working hours, shifts, and job satisfaction—can influence the performance of caring behaviors [20-22].
Considering the role of caring behaviors in achieving a high-quality health system [23] and the impact of the nursing work environment on these behaviors, adherence to HPH standards may be associated with nurses' caring behaviors.
The implementation of health promotion activities is essential for hospitals; however, the current provision of these services in Iranian hospitals remains unclear [3]. Thus, it is necessary to assess the level of adherence to HPH standards by administrators [24]. Furthermore, understanding the relationship between adherence to these standards and nurses’ caring behaviors can offer valuable insights for researchers and healthcare managers. Nonetheless, there is a lack of studies investigating this relationship. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adherence to the standards of HPHs and nurses’ caring behaviors.
Instrument and Methods
Study design, Setting, and sample
This descriptive correlational study was conducted in 2021 in Birjand, located in the southeast of Iran. The study population included all nurses working in hospitals affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Nurses were selected using convenience sampling. In the absence of similar studies, the sample size was calculated to be 228 individuals using Cochran's formula (small population mode) with a 95% confidence interval, a precision level of 0.05, an estimated proportion of 0.5, and a 10% attrition rate.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were having at least a bachelor's degree in nursing, at least one year of clinical work experience, and willingness to participate in the study. Nurses who did not fully complete the questionnaires were excluded from the study.
Measurements/tools
The research tools comprised a demographic characteristics checklist (age, sex, level of education, marital status, etc.), the Caring Behavior Inventory (CBI-42), and the WHO’s Health Promotion Standards Adherence Scale.
Caring behavior was measured using the CBI-42, designed by Wolf et al. [25]. The CBI-42 consists of 42 items divided into five main dimensions, including respectful deference to others (12 items), assurance of human presence (12 items), positive connectedness (nine items), professional knowledge and skill (five items), and attentiveness to the other’s experience (four items). Each item is rated on a six-point Likert scale, ranging from "never" (one) to "always" (six). The minimum possible score for this questionnaire is 42, and the maximum is 252, with higher scores indicating more significant caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective. The questionnaire does not include reverse scoring. The reliability (α=0.85) and validity (face and content) of the CBI-42 were evaluated and confirmed in the study by Rafiei et al. [26]. In this study, the reliability of the inventory was assessed using the internal consistency method, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to be 0.97.
To assess adherence to HPH standards, the WHO’s Health Promotion Standards Adherence Scale was utilized. This scale consists of 68 questions covering five key dimensions of HPHs, including management policy (17 items), patient evaluation (nine items), patient information and interventions (seven items), creating a healthy work environment (16 items), and continuity and cooperation (19 items). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "No" (zero) to "Yes" (three). The minimum possible score on the questionnaire is zero, and the maximum is 201, with higher scores indicating better compliance with health promotion standards. The validity and reliability of the tool were tested by Groene et al. in 38 hospitals across eight member countries of the International Network of HPHs. The tool was validated, and Cronbach’s α coefficient was reported to range from 0.77 to 0.88 [27]. In this study, we assessed the reliability of the scale using the internal consistency method and obtained a Cronbach's alpha value exceeding 0.80.
Data collection
Data collection was carried out through direct visits to the selected hospitals during three work shifts. Paper questionnaires were completed by nurses who met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate.
Data analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26. Frequency distribution tables were used for qualitative variables, while numerical measures, such as minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables, including caring behavior. Spearman's correlation coefficient was employed to assess the potential correlation between caring behavior and adherence to the HPH standards. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Findings
Three hospitals with 228 nurses were evaluated in this study (Table 1). The majority of the nurses were women (53.1%) and married (71.1%). In terms of education, 217 participants (95.2%) held a bachelor's degree, while 11 participants (4.8%) had a master's degree. Most nurses (36.4%) were employed temporarily. The average work experience of the nurses was 8.17±6.15 years (range: 1-25 years), and their average age was 31.15±6.65 years (range: 20-52 years) (Table 2).
Table 1. The examined hospitals
Table 2. Frequency of sociodemographic characteristics of nurses
From the nurses’ perspective, the average total adherence score to the standards of HPH was 130.74±25.68. Regarding the level of compliance with the standards of HPH, continuity and cooperation had the highest average score (36.96±8.16), while patient information and interventions had the lowest average score (14.04±2.90). In terms of the dimensions of nurses’ caring behaviors, assurance of human presence had the highest average score (62.03±9.04), while attention to others’ experiences had the lowest average score (20.69±3.44). Additionally, the overall caring behavior score from the nurses’ perspective was 215.52±29.25 (Table 3).
Table 3. Mean adherence level to the standards of health-promoting hospitals and the quality of caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective
The results of Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a significant positive relationship between the total score of HPH standards and the total score of caring behaviors from the nurses' perspective (p<0.001, r=0.49). Similarly, a significant positive relationship was observed between all dimensions of HPH standards and all dimensions of caring behaviors from the nurses' point of view (p<0.001; Table 4).
Table 4. Bivariate correlations between health-promoting hospitals’ standards and Caring Behavior Inventory (CBI) subscales
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adherence to HPH standards and nurses’ caring behaviors. While the compliance level appeared relatively favorable in this study, a comparison on a larger scale revealed that it falls short of the goals set by the HPH standards. For example, a review by Hamidi et al. demonstrated that adherence to the HPH standards in Iranian hospitals is weak [28]. Other studies conducted in different countries show higher levels of compliance with these standards [29]. Currently, only seven health centers in Iran have joined HPH programs [30]. These weaknesses and discrepancies may result from the treatment-oriented management policies of hospitals in Iran, where promoting a healthy lifestyle is not prioritized.
In our study, nurses rated continuity in treatment and cooperation as the highest-scoring areas. A similar study by Javan Biparva et al. also found that nurses perceive high compliance with HPH standards, with continuity in treatment and cooperation receiving the highest score [31]. However, Pezeshki et al. reported that patient information and therapeutic interventions have the highest score while promoting a healthy work environment receives the lowest score [32]. Similarly, Seif Rabiei et al. found that patient information and therapeutic interventions score the highest while promoting a healthy work environment score the lowest [33]. These variations may be attributed to differences in the planning and management policies of hospitals regarding the implementation of health promotion programs across different geographical areas in Iran.
In this research, nurses perceived their caring behavior as high, with a score of 215 out of 252. This finding aligns with other studies showing that nurses have a positive perception of their caring behaviors [34, 35]. Studies conducted in other countries, including China, also support the idea that nurses prioritize and excel in providing quality care [36]. This global focus on caring behavior highlights its significance in the field of nursing.
In our study, nurses demonstrated higher levels of caring behavior in terms of respecting others and ensuring human presence. This emphasizes the importance of humanistic practice in nursing [37] and reinforces the value of altruism for effective patient care [38]. Surprisingly, the dimensions of professional knowledge and skill, as well as attention to other experiences, received lower average scores from the nurses’ perspectives. This suggests a potential neglect of the clinical competence aspect of caring behavior [39]. Similar findings were observed in other studies, where the highest scores are found in the "assurance of human presence" subscale, and the lowest scores are found in the "knowledge and skill" subscale [40-42]. The differences in the mean scores for the components of nursing behavior could be attributed to variations in methodologies, nurse characteristics, research environments, or the tools and scales used. Despite the favorable behavior observed in the nurses in this study, it remains essential for nurses to pay more attention to patients' emotional needs during the caring process and to focus more on behaviors that are more objective and observable by patients.
According to the results, there was a positive and meaningful correlation between all the different dimensions of the HPH standards and the dimensions of caring behavior from the nurses' perspective. Similarly, Naderi et al. demonstrated that the implementation of health promotion standards in the hospital they studied is able to improve many important care indicators [1]. Cho & Han found that a positive and supportive work environment is associated with better health-promoting behaviors and higher nursing performance quality [43]. Putra et al. identified a positive correlation between job satisfaction and the caring behaviors of nurses, particularly in areas, such as supervision, potential rewards, colleagues, and the nature of work [22]. Azizi-Fini et al. also report a positive and significant correlation between nurses' caring behaviors and patient satisfaction, suggesting that these behaviors can enhance the quality of patient care [44].
In terms of the limitations of the research, the current study is based on correlation analysis; therefore, interpreting the results as cause-and-effect relationships would not be entirely realistic. Additionally, this research was conducted among nurses, so caution should be exercised when generalizing the findings to other populations. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect data in this study, which introduces certain limitations. In this type of questionnaire, there is a possibility that respondents may answer in a way that aligns with what they believe is expected, rather than how they actually behave. Furthermore, the large number of questions can lead to errors in self-reporting, which may affect the research results.
Conclusion
Hospitals enhance nurses' caring behavior by adhering to HPH standards and fostering a positive work environment with improved inter-professional relationships.
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank the Deputyship for Research at Birjand University of Medical Sciences for facilitating this study, as well as all the nurses who participated in this research.
Ethical Permissions: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences under the code BUMS.REC.1400.176. To protect the participants' identities, the names of the hospitals were replaced with the English letters A, B, and C. Furthermore, participation in this study was voluntary, and the questionnaires were completed at the participants' discretion, with their informed written consent.
Conflicts of Interests: The authors declared no conflicts of interests.
Authors' Contribution: Esmaeelzadeh M (First Author), Introduction Writer/Methodologist/Main Researcher/Discussion Writer/Statistical Analyst (35%); Pirani M (Second Author), Introduction Writer/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer (15%); Bahrami M (Third Author), Methodologist/Assistant Researcher/Statistical Analyst (10%); Soleimanian Asl M (Fourth Author), Introduction Writer/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer (10%); Sabeghi H (Fifth Author), Methodologist/Assistant Researcher/Discussion Writer/Statistical Analyst (30%)
Funding/Support: No financial support was received for this article.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Promotion Setting
Received: 2024/11/1 | Accepted: 2024/12/11 | Published: 2024/12/25
Received: 2024/11/1 | Accepted: 2024/12/11 | Published: 2024/12/25
References
1. Naderi S, Amiri M, Riahi L. Effect of health promoting hospitals' standards on hospital performance a case study in Fatemieh Hospital in Shahrod. J Hosp. 2015;14(2):101-9. [Persian] [Link]
2. Sadeqi-Arani A, Sadeqi-Arani Z, Askari R, Madadizadeh F, Bahrami MA, Rahati M, et al. Investigating the status of hospitals in Kashan, Aran and Bidgol cities in achieving health promotion standards in 2020. Manag Strateg Health Syst. 2022;7(3):292-300. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.18502/mshsj.v7i3.11397]
3. Onegh S, Vahdat S, Mahfozpour S. Determining the readiness of hospitals in Golestan province in terms of management in establishing standards for health promotion hospitals. J Health Manag. 2018;8(4):29-38. [Persian] [Link]
4. Seifrabiei MA, Sanaee Z, Sharbaf MA, Nikpajouh A. Persian translation and determining the validity of 2020 standards for health-promoting hospitals and health services affiliated with the world health organization. Int J Prev Med. 2023;14(1):119. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_44_23]
5. Estebsari F, MostafaieD, Taghdisi MH, Ghavami M. Health promoting hospitals: Concepts, indexes and standards. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2016;3(4):281-6. [Persian] [Link]
6. Wartiningsih M, Supriyanto S, Widati S, Ernawaty E, Lestari R. Health promoting hospital: A practical strategy to improve patient loyalty in public sector. J Public Health Res. 2020;9(2):1832. [Link] [DOI:10.4081/jphr.2020.1832]
7. Didarloo A, Shojaei Zadeh D, Ahmadi B. Health promotion in hospitals, the challenges facing the health care system. Healthy Work J. 2008;2(5):19-27. [Persian] [Link]
8. Nikpajouh A, Seifrabiei M, Sanaei Z. The latest standards of health promoting hospitals. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2023;11(3):229-32. [Persian] [Link]
9. Yousefi S, Vafaeenajar A, Esmaily H, Hooshmand E. Evaluation of general educational hospitals affiliated to Mashhad university of medical sciences based on the standards of health-promoting hospitals. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2018;5(4):320-7. [Persian] [Link]
10. Cho HK, Kim B. Effect of nurses' grit on nursing job performance and the double mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Healthcare. 2022;10(2):396. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/healthcare10020396]
11. Duan X, Shi Y. Current status of quality evaluation of nursing care through director review and reflection from the nursing quality control centers. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(10):3737-45. [Link]
12. Hosseinzadeh H, Mohammadi MA, Shamshiri M. The study of caring behaviors and its determinant factors from the perspective of nurses in educational hospitals of Ardabil. J Health Care. 2019;21(3):203-11. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jhc.21.3.203]
13. Taylan S, Özkan İ, Şahin G. Caring behaviors, moral sensitivity, and emotional intelligence in intensive care nurses: A descriptive study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021;57(2):734-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/ppc.12608]
14. Tarbiyat Nazloo S, Salimi S. Predictors of nursing care behaviors in critical care units. Nurs Midwifery J. 2019;17(5):371-8. [Persian] [Link]
15. Ferede AJ, Wettergren L, Erlandsson K, Gezie LD, Lindgren H, Geda B. Patients' perceptions of caring behaviors at referral hospitals in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Sci. 2023;10(3):391-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.06.015]
16. Azimi N, Radfar M, Khademi M, Khalkhali H. A systematic review of measurement tools for assessing nursing care behaviors. Nurs Midwifery J. 2023;21(3):206-17. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.61186/unmf.21.3.206]
17. Safa A, Rayat F, Arbabi Z, Abedzadeh M, Gholami M. The relationship between nurses' care behaviors and patients' satisfaction in public hospitals of Kashan. Q J Nurs Manag. 2021;10(3):1-10. [Persian] [Link]
18. Kibret H, Tadesse B, Debella A, Degefa M, Regassa LD. Level and predictors of nurse caring behaviors among nurses serving in inpatient departments in public hospitals in Harari region, eastern Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):76. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12912-022-00856-8]
19. Ashagere M, Yeheyis T, Addisu D, Abera W, Amlaku T, Tadesse F, et al. Caring behaviour and its associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals in Gamo zone, southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(10):e072183. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072183]
20. Alharbi HF, Alzahrani NS, Almarwani AM, Asiri SA, Alhowaymel FM. Patients' satisfaction with nursing care quality and associated factors: A cross-section study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):3253-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/nop2.1577]
21. Darvishpour A, Mahdavi Fashtami S. Investigation of caring behavior and caring burden and their associated factors among nurses who cared for patients with COVID-19 in east Guilan, the north of Iran. Nurs Res Pract. 2023;2023:8567870. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2023/8567870]
22. Putra KR, Andayani T, Ningrum EH. Job satisfaction and caring behavior among nurses in a military hospital: A cross-sectional study. J Public Health Res. 2021;10(2):2212. [Link] [DOI:10.4081/jphr.2021.2212]
23. Arsat N, Lah NASN, Thomas DC, Soong SF, Chong LT, Sawatan W, et al. The effect of work setting and demographic factors on caring behaviour among nurses in the public hospitals and public health services, Sabah, Malaysia. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):194. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01359-w]
24. Heydarnia M, Abachzadeh K, Damari B, Azargashb E, Vosoughmoghaddam A. Study of expert opinion on health promotive services for patients at hospitals affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science. PAJOOHANDEH. 2009;14(4):183-90. [Persian] [Link]
25. Wolf ZR, Colahan M, Costello A. Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction. Medsurg Nurs. 1998;7(2):99-105. [Link]
26. Rafiei F, Haghdoust Oskouei SF, Peyrovi H, Haghani H. A comparative study of the effectiveness of the clinical practice of fundamental nursing through role-play versus traditional method on caring behaviors of sophomore-level nursing students. Iran J Nurs. 2009;22(60):42-52. [Persian] [Link]
27. Groene O, Alonso J, Klazinga N. Development and validation of the WHO self-assessment tool for health promotion in hospitals: Results of a study in 38 hospitals in eight countries. Health Promot Int. 2010;25(2):221-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/heapro/daq013]
28. Hamidi Y, Hazavehei SMM, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Seif Rabiei MA, Farhadian M, Alimohamadi S, et al. Health promoting hospitals in Iran: A review of the current status, challenges, and future prospects. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:47. [Link] [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.33.47]
29. Lin YW, Huang HL, Tung SC. The organisational diagnosis of a health promoting hospital in Taiwan. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(2):248-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.025]
30. Shahrbaf MA, Nasr DS, Langroudi ZT. COVID-19 and health promoting hospitals in Iran; What do we stand?. Int J Prev Med. 2022;13:125. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_492_21]
31. Javan Biparva A, Hossein-Shokouh SM, Teymourzadeh E. Preparedness to implementation of health promoting hospitals standards in military healthcare centers from nurses perspective. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2022;10(1):80-92. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.52547/ijhehp.10.1.80]
32. Pezeshki MZ, Alizadeh M, Nikpajouh A, Ebadi A, Nohi S, Soleimanpour M. Evaluation of the health promotion standards in governmental and non-governmental hospitals in East-Azerbaijan. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:113. [Link] [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.33.113]
33. Seif Rabiei MA, Sanaei Z, Nikpajouh A, Amiri J, Doaee M, Jalili E, et al. Assessing the status of hospitals in Hamadan Iran with the health promoting hospital standards. Russ Open Med J. 2023;12(4). [Link] [DOI:10.15275/rusomj.2023.0406]
34. Yau XC, Tam WSW, Seah HWV, Siah CJR. An exploration of factors influencing inpatient nurses' care behaviour in an acute hospital setting. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(6):473-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzy199]
35. Zahaki Arasteh S, Rezapour-Nasrabad R, Mousavizadeh SN, Nasiri M. Assessment of nurses' caring behaviors from the perspective of Covid-19 patients. J Patient Exp. 2023;10:23743735231196378. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/23743735231196378]
36. Liao L, Zhang F, Zhang Y, Guan C, Xu G, Yuan C, et al. Nurse managers' perceptions and experiences of caring behavior for clinical nurses: A multicenter survey. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):383. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01541-0]
37. Delmas P, O'Reilly L, Cara C, Brousseau S, Weidmann J, Roulet-Schwab D, et al. Effects on nurses' quality of working life and on patients' quality of life of an educational intervention to strengthen humanistic practice among hemodialysis nurses in Switzerland: A protocol for a mixed-methods cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2018;17:47. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12912-018-0320-0]
38. Alavi A, Zargham-Boroujeni A, Yousefy A, Bahrami M. Altruism, the values dimension of caring self-efficacy concept in Iranian pediatric nurses. J Educ Health Promot. 2017;6:8. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_142_14]
39. Rahmah NM, Hariyati TS, Sahar J. Nurses' efforts to maintain competence: A qualitative study. J Public Health Res. 2021;11(2):2736. [Link] [DOI:10.4081/jphr.2021.2736]
40. Watson J. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. Chem: Springer; 2008. [Link]
41. Robinson EM, Lee SM, Zollfrank A, Jurchak M, Frost D, Grace P. Enhancing moral agency: Clinical ethics residency for nurses. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(5):12-20. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/hast.353]
42. Inocian EP, Cruz JP, Saeed Alshehry A, Alshamlani Y, Ignacio EH, Tumala RB. Professional quality of life and caring behaviours among clinical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Nurs. 2021;10:1111. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jocn.15937]
43. Cho H, Han K. Associations among nursing work environment and health-promoting behaviors of nurses and nursing performance quality: A multilevel modeling approach. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(4):403-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jnu.12390]
44. Azizi-Fini I, Mousavi MS, Mazroui-Sabdani A, Adib-Hajbaghery M. Correlation between nurses' caring behaviors and patients' satisfaction. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2012;1(1):36-40. [Link] [DOI:10.5812/nms.7901]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |