Volume 12, Issue 3 (2024)
Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(3): 477-485 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
La Rangki R, Fithria F. Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Adults with Stomas. Health Educ Health Promot 2024; 12 (3) :477-485
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-76518-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-76518-en.html
R. La Rangki *1, F. Fithria2
1- Department of Nursing, Medical Faculty, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
2- Department of Public Health, Public Health of Faculty, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
2- Department of Public Health, Public Health of Faculty, University of Halu Oleo, Kendari, Indonesia
Abstract: (401 Views)
Aims: The emergence of a stoma can negatively impact the quality of life, as it alters both bodily function and appearance, potentially leading to physical, psychological, and social challenges. Understanding the factors affecting the quality of life in adults with stomas is essential for developing strategies to improve their overall well-being. Thus, this study examined all potential factors affecting the quality of life for adults with a stoma.
Information & Methods: To identify primary studies on “quality of life,” “colostomy,” “ileostomy,” and “intestinal stoma,” the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched from 2000 to 2024. Additionally, we manually reviewed publication lists, reference lists, and citations.
Findings: Demographic, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors affect the quality of life for individuals with a stoma. These influencing factors can be divided into two main categories, namely personal factors and those related to the stoma itself. The ostomy-related factors were the most consistent category among the studies, demonstrating a strong significance with quality of life. This significance was even stronger when adjusted for socio-demographic factors compared to personal factors.
Conclusion: Demographic, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors affect the quality of life for individuals with a stoma.
Information & Methods: To identify primary studies on “quality of life,” “colostomy,” “ileostomy,” and “intestinal stoma,” the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched from 2000 to 2024. Additionally, we manually reviewed publication lists, reference lists, and citations.
Findings: Demographic, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors affect the quality of life for individuals with a stoma. These influencing factors can be divided into two main categories, namely personal factors and those related to the stoma itself. The ostomy-related factors were the most consistent category among the studies, demonstrating a strong significance with quality of life. This significance was even stronger when adjusted for socio-demographic factors compared to personal factors.
Conclusion: Demographic, physical, psychological, social, and spiritual factors affect the quality of life for individuals with a stoma.
Keywords: Quality of Life [MeSH], Psychological Well-Being [MeSH], Colostomy [MeSH], Ileostomy [MeSH]
Article Type: Systematic Review |
Subject:
Quality of Life
Received: 2024/07/26 | Accepted: 2024/09/2 | Published: 2024/09/28
Received: 2024/07/26 | Accepted: 2024/09/2 | Published: 2024/09/28
References
1. Baxter NN, Novotny PJ, Jacobson T, Maidl LJ, Sloan J, Young-Fadok TM. A stoma quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(2):205-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10350-005-0275-6]
2. Jing W, Willis R, Feng Z. Factors influencing quality of life of elderly people with dementia and care implications: A systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;66:23-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2016.04.009]
3. Nasvall P, Dahlstrand U, Lowenmark T, Rutegard J, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K. Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(1):55-64. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11136-016-1367-6]
4. Szpilewska K, Juzwiszyn J, Bolanowska Z, Bolanowska Z, Milan M, Chabowski M, et al. Acceptance of disease and the quality of life in patients with enteric stoma. Pol J Surg. 2018;90(1):13-7. [Link] [DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0011.5954]
5. Coons SJ, Chongpison Y, Wendel CS, Grant M, Krouse RS. Overall quality of life and difficulty paying for ostomy supplies in the Veterans Affairs ostomy health-related quality of life study: An exploratory analysis. Med Care. 2007;45(9):891-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318074ce9b]
6. Cetolin SF, Beltrame V, Cetolin SK, Presta AA. Social and family dynamic with patients with definitive intestinal ostomy. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva. 2013;26(3):170-2. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/S0102-67202013000300003]
7. Post M. Definitions of quality of life: What has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(3):167-80. [Link] [DOI:10.1310/sci2003-167]
8. Salomé GM, De Almeida SA, Silveira MM. Quality of life and self-esteem of patients with intestinal stoma. J Coloproctol. 2014;34(4):231-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcol.2014.05.009]
9. Pittman J, Rawl SM, Schmidt CM, Grant M, Ko CY, Wendel C, et al. Demographic and clinical factors related to ostomy complications and quality of life in veterans with an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35(5):493-503. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/01.WON.0000335961.68113.cb]
10. Davidson F. Quality of life, wellbeing and care needs of Irish ostomates. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(17):S4-12. [Link] [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2016.25.17.S4]
11. Maydick-Youngberg D. A descriptive study to explore the effect of peristomal skin complications on quality of life of adults with a permanent ostomy. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2017;63(5):10-23. [Link]
12. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71]
13. Higgins J, Morgan R, Rooney A, Taylor K, Thayer K, Silva R, et al. Risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of exposure (ROBINS-E): Launch version. Risk of Bias. 2022. [Link]
14. Davis JS, Svavarsdóttir MH, Pudło M, Arena R, Lee Y, Jensen MK. Factors impairing quality of life for people with an ostomy. Gastrointest Nurs. 2011;9(Suppl 2). [Link] [DOI:10.12968/gasn.2011.9.Sup2.14]
15. Diniz IV, Costa IKF, Nascimento JA, Da Silva IP, De Mendonça AEO, Soares MJGO. Factors associated to quality of life in people with intestinal stomas. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem. 2021;55:e20200377. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2020-0377]
16. Goldstine J, Van Hees R, Van De Vorst D, Skountrianos G, Nichols T. Factors influencing health-related quality of life of those in the Netherlands living with an ostomy. Br J Nurs. 2019;28(22):S10-7. [Link] [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2019.28.22.S10]
17. Holzer B, Matzel K, Schiedeck T, Christiansen J, Christensen P, Rius J, et al. Do geographic and educational factors influence the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy?. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(12):2209-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10350-005-0194-6]
18. Ketterer SN, Leach MJ, Fraser C. Factors associated with quality of life among people living with a stoma in nonmetropolitan areas. Nurs Res. 2021;70(4):281-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000511]
19. Akiko Kimura C, Kamada I, Costa De Jesus CA, Guilhem D. Quality of life of colorectal cancer patients with intestinal stomas. J Carcinog Mutagen. 2014;S10:007. [Link] [DOI:10.4172/2157-2518.S10-007]
20. Liao C, Qin Y. Factors associated with stoma quality of life among stoma patients. Int J Nurs Sci. 2014;1(2):196-201. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.05.007]
21. Liu H, Zhu X, Yu J, He P, Shen B, Tang X, et al. The quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer and a stoma in China: A quantitative cross-sectional study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34(6):302-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000744348.32773.b9]
22. Pereira APDS, Cesarino CB, Ismael Martins MR, Pinto MH, Netinho JG. Associations among socio-demographic and clinical factors and the quality of life of ostomized patients. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2012;20(1):93-100. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/S0104-11692012000100013]
23. Schiergens TS, Hoffmann V, Schobel TN, Englert GH, Kreis ME, Thasler WE, et al. Long-term quality of life of patients with permanent end ileostomy: Results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(1):51-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000732]
24. Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI. Quality of life of stoma patients: Temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg. 2003;27(4):421-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00268-002-6699-4]
25. Silva CRDT, Andrade EMLR, Luz MHBA, Andrade JX, Da Silva GRF. Quality of life of people with intestinal stomas. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2017;30(2):144-51. [Link] [DOI:10.1590/1982-0194201700023]
26. Ssewanyana Y, Ssekitooleko B, Suuna B, Bua E, Wadeya J, Makumbi TK, et al. Quality of life of adult individuals with intestinal stomas in Uganda: A cross sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2021;21(1):427-36. [Link] [DOI:10.4314/ahs.v21i1.53]
27. Starczewska ME, Kaczmarek J, Rybicka A, Knyszyńska A, Pankiewicz M, Błażejewska J, et al. Quality of life of intestinal stoma patients. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa. 2019;27(1):38-44. [Link]
28. Zhang Y, Xian H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Wang X. Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health-related quality of life of patients with stoma: A descriptive, cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(15-16):2880-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jocn.14876]
29. Zewude WC, Derese T, Suga Y, Teklewold B. Quality of life in patients living with stoma. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31(5):993-1000. [Link] [DOI:10.4314/ejhs.v31i5.11]
30. Anaraki F, Vafaie M, Behboo R, Maghsoodi N, Esmaeilpour S, Safaee A. Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012;18(3):176-80. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/0973-1075.105687]
31. Aluzaite K, Nuttall JW, O'Connor M, Harvie R, Schultz M. Quality of life in postostomy surgery patients: A cross‐sectional survey. JGH Open. 2020;4(5):987-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/jgh3.12383]
32. Lin H, Lin R, Yan M, Lin L, Sun X, Wu M, et al. Associations between preparedness, perceived stress, depression, and quality of life in family caregivers of patients with a temporary enterostomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;70:102557. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102557]
33. Giordano V, Iovino P, Corvese F, Vellone E, Alvaro R, Villa G. Caregiver contribution to self‐care and its associated variables among caregivers of ostomy patients: Results of a cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(1-2):99-110. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jocn.15851]
34. Rashed NI, Khalifa MI, Zein El Dein NA, Omar TK. Effect of partnership based program with primary caregivers of children on stoma care. Menoufia Nurs J. 2020;5(1):39-54. [Link] [DOI:10.21608/menj.2020.123663]
35. Ambe PC, Kugler CM, Breuing J, Grohmann E, Friedel J, Hess S, et al. The effect of preoperative stoma site marking on risk of stoma‐related complications in patients with intestinal ostomy-a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24(8):904-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/codi.16118]
36. Zelga P, Kluska P, Zelga M, Piasecka-Zelga J, Dziki A. Patient-related factors associated with stoma and peristomal complications following fecal ostomy surgery: A scoping review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(5):415-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000796]
37. Voegeli D, Karlsmark T, Eddes EH, Hansen HD, Zeeberg R, Hakan-Bloch J, et al. Factors influencing the incidence of peristomal skin complications: Evidence from a multinational survey on living with a stoma. Gastrointest Nurs. 2020;18(Suppl 4):S31-8. [Link] [DOI:10.12968/gasn.2020.18.Sup4.S31]
38. Maglio A, Malvone AP, Scaduto V, Brambilla D, Denti FC. The frequency of early stomal, peristomal and skin complications. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(22):1272-6. [Link] [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2021.30.22.1272]
39. Polidano K, Chew-Graham CA, Farmer AD, Saunders B. Access to psychological support for young people following stoma surgery: Exploring patients' and clinicians' perspectives. Qual Health Res. 2021;31(3):535-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1049732320972338]
40. Black P, Notter J. Psychological issues affecting patients living with a stoma. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(6):S20-32. [Link] [DOI:10.12968/bjon.2021.30.6.S20]
41. Kittscha J, Wilson V, Fairbrother G, Bliokas V. The role of peer support groups in adjustment to stoma: A qualitative study. Collegian. 2024;31(3):173-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.03.002]
42. Keng CJ, Lee J, Valencia M, McKechnie T, Forbes S, Eskicioglu C. Transition home following new fecal ostomy creation: A qualitative study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48(6):537-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000814]
43. Ren Y, Zhou Y, Zhang L, Yang Y, Xia R, Yang Y, et al. Readiness for return-to-work model-based analysis of return-to-work perception of young and middle-aged colorectal cancer patients with stoma in the early postoperative period: A descriptive qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(7):411. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07828-x]
44. Yang F, Cui S, Cai M, Feng F, Zhao M, Sun M, et al. The experiences of family resilience in patients with permanent colostomy and their spouses: A dyadic qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;70:102590. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102590]
45. Stavropoulou A, Vlamakis D, Kaba E, Kalemikerakis I, Polikandrioti M, Fasoi G, et al. "Living with a stoma": Exploring the lived experience of patients with permanent colostomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8512. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18168512]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |