Volume 12, Issue 3 (2024)
Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(3): 459-469 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nurmila W, Erika K, Erfina E. Nurses' Experience Evaluation in Traditional and Complementary Medicine; A Systematic Review. Health Educ Health Promot 2024; 12 (3) :459-469
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-75453-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-75453-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Abstract: (392 Views)
Aims: The study seeks to ascertain the instruments used in research pertaining to the area under evaluation, as well as the validity of these instruments.
Information & Methods: This scoping review is conducted using the PRISMA-SCR guidelines and utilized the Scoping Review Framework, which consists of five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, data charting, and summarizing and reporting results. The review focused on assessing instruments used to evaluate nurses' experiences with Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM). A literature search was conducted in March 2024 across six databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and GARUDA, to identify studies published between 2014 and 2024.
Findings: A total of 18 relevant studies from 12 countries across continents, with the majority from Asia, are included. The domains assessed include nurses' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, practices, and communication related to T&CM. Although most instruments were validated, some studies did not report tests of validity and reliability.
Conclusion: The instruments used to measure nurses' attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, practices, and communication regarding T&CM are primarily self-developed or adapted from previous research, with varied reliability and validity testing. Most studies focused on assessing attitudes and knowledge, while fewer addressed beliefs or communication.
Information & Methods: This scoping review is conducted using the PRISMA-SCR guidelines and utilized the Scoping Review Framework, which consists of five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, data charting, and summarizing and reporting results. The review focused on assessing instruments used to evaluate nurses' experiences with Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM). A literature search was conducted in March 2024 across six databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and GARUDA, to identify studies published between 2014 and 2024.
Findings: A total of 18 relevant studies from 12 countries across continents, with the majority from Asia, are included. The domains assessed include nurses' knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, practices, and communication related to T&CM. Although most instruments were validated, some studies did not report tests of validity and reliability.
Conclusion: The instruments used to measure nurses' attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, practices, and communication regarding T&CM are primarily self-developed or adapted from previous research, with varied reliability and validity testing. Most studies focused on assessing attitudes and knowledge, while fewer addressed beliefs or communication.
Article Type: Systematic Review |
Subject:
Health Care
Received: 2024/06/4 | Accepted: 2024/09/7 | Published: 2024/10/12
Received: 2024/06/4 | Accepted: 2024/09/7 | Published: 2024/10/12
References
1. WHO. WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Link]
2. WHO. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. [Link]
3. Lee EL, Richards N, Harrison J, Barnes J. Prevalence of use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine by the general population: A systematic review of national studies published from 2010 to 2019. Drug Saf. 2022;45(7):713-35. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40264-022-01189-w]
4. Alsabri M, Carfagnini C, Amin M, Castilo F, Lewis J, Ashkar M, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine for children with sickle cell disease: A systematic review. Blood Rev. 2023;59:101052. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.blre.2023.101052]
5. Mwaka AD, Abbo C, Kinengyere AA. Traditional and complementary medicine use among adult cancer patients undergoing conventional treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review on the use, safety and risks. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:3699-712. [Link] [DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S251975]
6. Zhao S, Otieno F, Akpan A, Moots RJ. Complementary and alternative medicine use in rheumatoid arthritis: Considerations for the pharmacological management of elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2017;34(4):255-64. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40266-017-0443-0]
7. Thomson P, Jones J, Evans JM, Leslie SL. Factors influencing the use of complementary and alternative medicine and whether patients inform their primary care physician. Complement Ther Med. 2012;20(1-2):45-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2011.10.001]
8. Wemrell M, Olsson A, Landgren K. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in psychiatric units in Sweden. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(10):946-57. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/01612840.2020.1744203]
9. Tangkiatkumjai M, Boardman H, Walker DM. Potential factors that influence usage of complementary and alternative medicine worldwide: A systematic review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20(1):363. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12906-020-03157-2]
10. Gunaydin N, Ozpulat F. The role of nurses in traditional-modern medicine conflict. New Trends Issues Proc Adv Pure Appl Sci. 2018;(10):110-3. [Link] [DOI:10.18844/gjpaas.v0i10.3751]
11. Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE. Attitudes and knowledge about direct and indirect risks among conventional and complementary health care providers in cancer care. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):44. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12906-018-2106-z]
12. Bengre A. Transcultural nursing: Cultural competence in nurses. Int J Nurs Educ. 2012;4(1). [Link]
13. Casbarro N, Ezomo O, Woolley K, Smith R, Hardin C, Feinn R, et al. Complementary and integrative medicine: An observational study on pediatric clinicians' knowledge, beliefs and practices. Complement Ther Med. 2021;58:102693. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102693]
14. Schulenburg J. Considerations for complementary and alternative interventions for pain. AORN J. 2015;101(3):319-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2015.01.013]
15. Erika KA. The effect of transcultural nursing, child healthcare model and transtheoretical model approaches to knowledge and culture of family. Jurnal Ners. 2016;9(2):262-9. [Link] [DOI:10.20473/jn.v9i2.2572]
16. Chang HY, Chang HL. A review of nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and ability to communicate the risks and benefits of complementary and alternative medicine. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(11-12):1466-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jocn.12790]
17. Hall H, Leach M, Brosnan C, Collins M. Nurses' attitudes towards complementary therapies: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;69:47-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.008]
18. Glarcher M, Schumacher P, Fritz E. Care quality instruments. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(5):532-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2015-0010]
19. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. [Link] [DOI:10.7326/M18-0850]
20. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1364557032000119616]
21. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Khalil H, Larsen P, Marnie C, et al. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(4):953-68. [Link] [DOI:10.11124/JBIES-21-00242]
22. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71]
23. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4]
24. Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):520-32. [Link] [DOI:10.11124/JBIES-22-00123]
25. Dehghan M, Namjoo Z, Jafari M, Kordestani G, Tabebordbar N, Payam F, et al. Iranian nurses' knowledge and attitude toward complementary and alternative medicines: Is there any relation with quality of nursing care?. Front Public Health. 2022;10:942354. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.942354]
26. Makarem NN, Brome D, Romani M. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of complementary and alternative medicine: A survey of physicians and nurses at an academic medical center in Beirut. Libyan J Med. 2022;17(1):2071813. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/19932820.2022.2071813]
27. Zeighami M, Soltani-Nejad S. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of complementary and alternative medicine: A survey of Iranian nurses. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(4):380-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1744987120925852]
28. Chang HY, Lo CL, Hung YY. Development and validation of traditional & complementary medicine (TCM) scales for nurses: Using structural equation modelling (SEM). BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;19(1):321. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12906-019-2733-z]
29. Metin ZG, Izgu N, Karadas C, Donmez AA. Perspectives of oncology nurses on complementary and alternative medicine in Turkey: A cross-sectional survey. Holist Nurs Pract. 2018;32(2):107-13. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/HNP.0000000000000256]
30. Cırık V, Efe E. Pediatric nurses' usage and experience toward complementary health approaches. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(11):1120-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/acm.2018.0075]
31. Gyasi RM, Abass K, Adu-Gyamfi S, Accam BT, Nyamadi VM. The capabilities of nurses for complementary and traditional medicine integration in Africa. J Altern Complement Med. 2018;24(3):282-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/acm.2017.0133]
32. Hall H, Leach MJ, Brosnan C, Cant R, Collins M. Registered nurses' communication about patients' use of complementary therapies: A national survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(8):1403-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.010]
33. Shorofi SA, Arbon P. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among Australian hospital-based nurses: Knowledge, attitude, personal and professional use, reasons for use, CAM referrals, and socio-demographic predictors of CAM users. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;27:37-45. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.03.001]
34. Balouchi A, Rahnama M, Hastings-Tolsma M, Shoja MM, Bolaydehyi E. Knowledge, attitude and use of complementary and integrative health strategies: A preliminary survey of Iranian nurses. J Integr Med. 2016;14(2):121-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2095-4964(16)60245-5]
35. Van Vliet M, Jong M, Busch M, Meijer JEM, Von Rosenstiel IA, Jong MC. Attitudes, beliefs, and practices of integrative medicine among nurses in the Netherlands. J Holist Nurs. 2015;33(2):110-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0898010114555339]
36. Orkaby B, Greenberger C. Israeli nurses' attitudes to the holistic approach to health and their use of complementary and alternative therapies. J Holist Nurs. 2015;33(1):19-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0898010114542876]
37. Rojas-Cooley MT, Grant M. Complementary and alternative medicine: Oncology nurses' knowledge and attitudes. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(2):217-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1188/09.ONF.217-224]
38. Kim S, Lee MN, Lee S. Nurses' knowledge, perceived barriers, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine in South Korea. Holist Nurs Pract. 2016;30(6):338-44. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/HNP.0000000000000176]
39. Jong M, Lundqvist V, Jong MC. A cross-sectional study on Swedish licensed nurses' use, practice, perception and knowledge about complementary and alternative medicine. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015;29(4):642-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/scs.12192]
40. Geisler C, Cheung C, Johnson Steinhagen S, Neubeck P, Brueggeman AD. Nurse practitioner knowledge, use, and referral of complementary/alternative therapies. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015;27(7):380-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/2327-6924.12190]
41. Brewer NJ, Turrise SL, Kim-Godwin YS, Pond RS. Nurses' knowledge and treatment beliefs: Use of complementary and alternative medicine for pain management. J Holist Nurs. 2019;37(3):248-59. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0898010118822212]
42. Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith G. Developing a measure of treatment beliefs: The complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory. Complement Ther Med. 2005;13(2):144-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.005]
43. Siedlecki SL. Complementary and alternative therapies (CAT) in academic programs and nursing practice: Is more education is needed?. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;43:101327. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101327]
44. Kusunoki J, Ikezaki S, Majima T. Factors associated with nursing practice for cancer patients using complementary and alternative medicine. Collegian. 2023;30(5):668-75. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2023.08.001]
45. WHO. Traditional medicine in the WHO South-East Asia region: Review of progress 2014-2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. [Link]
46. Guo DA. Surging cooperation with ASEAN countries on traditional medicine. Chin Herb Med. 2021;13(4):439-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chmed.2021.09.007]
47. Park YL, Canaway R. Integrating traditional and complementary medicine with national healthcare systems for universal health coverage in Asia and the western pacific. Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(1):24-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/23288604.2018.1539058]
48. James PB, Wardle J, Steel A, Adams J. Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000895. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000895]
49. Alqudimat MR, Toupin April K, Hundert A, Jibb L, Victor C, Nathan PC, et al. Questionnaires assessing the use of complementary health approaches in pediatrics and their measurement properties: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2020;53:102520. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102520]
50. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021. [Link]
51. Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0]
52. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Washington DC: SAGE Publications; 2018. [Link]
53. Belita E, Fisher K, Yost J, Squires JE, Ganann R, Dobbins M. Validity, reliability, and acceptability of the evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) competence measure. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272699. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0272699]
54. Osmancevic S, Schoberer D, Lohrmann C, Großschädl F. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;113:103789. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103789]
55. Kurniati D, Adi Nugroho T, Yeni Wulandari R, Kurniawan M. The relationship of knowledge and role of nurse in management with hypertension patients. Idea Nurs J. 2024;3(1). [Link] [DOI:10.53690/inj.v3i01.212]
56. Amir H, Permatananda PANK, Cahyani DD, Langelo W, Rosita R, Sajodin S, et al. Enhancing skill conceptualization, critical thinking, and nursing knowledge through reflective case discussions: A systematic review. J Med Life. 2023;16(6):851-5. [Link] [DOI:10.25122/jml-2023-0042]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |