Volume 12, Issue 2 (2024)
Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(2): 331-340 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (234 Views)
Aims: One of the ways to improve the quality of education is to create a suitable and efficient mechanism to evaluate the performance of clinical academic faculty members; Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of designing a comprehensive model for evaluating the performance of clinical academic faculty members of schools of medical sciences.
Participants & Methods: The current study was a qualitative research employing descriptive-exploratory method and carried out in Tabriz in 2023. The used components were identified based on document review and semi-structured interview tools. In order to review the documents and analyze the interviews, three levels of open, central and selective coding were used. In order to comprehensively identify the main components and sub-components of the comprehensive performance evaluation model, in addition to reviewing the studies conducted in this field, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 15 experts in the field.
Findings: 8 main themes and 28 sub-themes were identified. Professional commitment, professional development, professional skills, research skills component, personality characteristics component, teaching and educational activities, consulting services and social-political activities were the main themes.
Conclusion: The performance evaluation of clinical academic faculty members is an effective process to identify strengths and weaknesses and is the basis for the participation of academic faculty members to improve quality in university development planning.
Participants & Methods: The current study was a qualitative research employing descriptive-exploratory method and carried out in Tabriz in 2023. The used components were identified based on document review and semi-structured interview tools. In order to review the documents and analyze the interviews, three levels of open, central and selective coding were used. In order to comprehensively identify the main components and sub-components of the comprehensive performance evaluation model, in addition to reviewing the studies conducted in this field, a semi-structured interview was conducted with 15 experts in the field.
Findings: 8 main themes and 28 sub-themes were identified. Professional commitment, professional development, professional skills, research skills component, personality characteristics component, teaching and educational activities, consulting services and social-political activities were the main themes.
Conclusion: The performance evaluation of clinical academic faculty members is an effective process to identify strengths and weaknesses and is the basis for the participation of academic faculty members to improve quality in university development planning.
Article Type: Qualitative Research |
Subject:
Social Health
Received: 2024/03/2 | Accepted: 2024/08/6 | Published: 2024/08/20
Received: 2024/03/2 | Accepted: 2024/08/6 | Published: 2024/08/20
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |