Volume 12, Issue 1 (2024)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2024, 12(1): 53-58 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Negara C, Sukartini T, Setiya D, Nursalam N. Effectiveness of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Non-Ulcer Diabetic Foot Incidents. Health Educ Health Promot 2024; 12 (1) :53-58
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-72239-en.html
1- Faculty of Nursing, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
2- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia
Abstract:   (1341 Views)
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of diabetes self-management education (DSME) at the Banjarmasin Health Center in reducing the prevalence of non-ulcer diabetic foot.
Materials & Methods: This research utilized an experimental design with a nonequivalent control group and employed consecutive sampling. A sample of 230 participants was divided into two groups: 115 respondents in the intervention group and 115 respondents in the control group. The instrument utilized in this research was the Diabetes Self-Care Activities Foot Care Questionnaire. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Mann-Whitney Test.
Findings: The mean incidence of non-ulcer diabetic foot in the intervention group differed from that of the control group both before and after the intervention by 0.009 (p-value=0.069). Further analysis revealed a significant difference (p-value=0.003) in the mean incidence of non-ulcerated diabetic foot following DSME between the intervention and control groups.
Conclusion: DSME effectively reduces the incidence of non-ulcerated diabetic foot at the Banjarmasin Community Health Center.
Full-Text [PDF 643 kb]   (1802 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (77 Views)  
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Health Promotion Approaches
Received: 2023/11/2 | Accepted: 2024/01/11 | Published: 2024/01/20
* Corresponding Author Address: aculty of Nursing, Airlangga University, Soekarno Street, East Java, Surabaya, Indonesia. Postal Code: 60115 (candra.negara@ulm.ac.id)

References
1. Stanek A, Mosti G, Nematillaevich TS, E Valesky EM, Ručigaj TP, Boucelma M, et al. No more venous ulcers-what more can we do?. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6153. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/jcm12196153]
2. Alibrahim A, AlRamadhan D, Johny S, Alhashemi M, Alduwaisan H, Al-Hilal M. The effect of structured diabetes self-management education on type 2 diabetes patients attending a primary health center in Kuwait. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;171:108567. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108567]
3. Nooseisai M, Viwattanakulvanid P, Kumar R, Viriyautsahakul N, Baloch GM, Somrongthong R. Effects of diabetes self-management education program on lowering blood glucose level, stress, and quality of life among females with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Thailand. Primary Health Care Res Dev. 2021;22:e46. [Link] [DOI:10.1017/S1463423621000505]
4. Kartika, Ismuntania, Karmila, Rakhman F. Effectiveness of variations of diabetes self-management education (dsme) on self care behavior in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients in tengku chik ditiro hospital. J Health Promot Behav. 2022;7(1):77-85. [Link] [DOI:10.26911/thejhpb.2021.07.01.08]
5. Mbride M. Effect of diabetes self-management education utilizing short message service among adults [dissertation]. Arizona: Grand canyon university; 2022. [Link]
6. Buro AW, Crowder SL, Rozen E, Stern M, Carson TL. Lifestyle interventions with mind-body or stress-management practices for cancer survivors: A rapid review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3355. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043355]
7. Bus SA, Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M, Rasmussen A, Raspovic A, Sacco ICN, et al. Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (iwgdf 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36:e3269. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/dmrr.3269]
8. Tursunovich RI. "Guidelines for designing effective language teaching materials. Am J Res Human Soc Sci. 2022;7:65-70. [Link]
9. Roberts RE. Qualitative interview questions: Guidance for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2020;25(9):3185-203. [Link] [DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4640]
10. Schmidt SK, Hemmestad L, MacDonald CS, Langberg H, Valentiner LS. Motivation and barriers to maintaining lifestyle changes in patients with type 2 diabetes after an intensive lifestyle intervention (the u-turn trial): A longitudinal qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7454. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17207454]
11. Guijarro-Ojeda JR, Ruiz-Cecilia R, Cardoso-Pulido MJ, Medina-Sánchez L. Examining the interplay between queerness and teacher wellbeing: A qualitative study based on foreign language teacher trainers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12208. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph182212208]
12. Subhan BA. Examining afro-cultural values in african american women with childhood sexual abuse history: its relationship with therapeutic outcomes. New York: John Jay College Of Criminal Justice; 2020. [Link]
13. Alsaleh FM, AlBassam KS, Alsairafi ZK, Naser AY. Knowledge and practice of foot self-care among patients with diabetes attending primary healthcare centres in kuwait: a cross-sectional study. Saudi Pharm J. 2021;29(6):506-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2021.04.006]
14. Taheri S, Zaghloul H, Chagoury O, Elhadad S, Hayder Ahmed S, El Khatib N, et al. Effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on bodyweight and glycaemia in early type 2 diabetes (Diadem-i): An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(6):477-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30117-0]
15. von dem Knesebeck O, Barbek R. Public stigma toward fatigue-do social characteristics of affected persons matter? Results from the soma. Soc study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1213721. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213721]
16. Alhumaid S, Al Mutair A, Al Alawi Z, Alsuliman M, Ahmed GY, Rabaan AA, et al. Knowledge of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers and factors influencing compliance: A systematic review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10:86 [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13756-021-00957-0]
17. Shim M, Jo HS. What quality factors matter in enhancing the perceived benefits of online health information sites? Application of the updated delone and mclean information systems success model. Int J Med Inform. 2020;137:104093. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104093]
18. Calvo RA, Peters D, Vold K, Ryan RM. Supporting human autonomy in AI systems: A framework for ethical enquiry. Ethics of Digital Well-Being. 2020;140:31-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2]
19. Edmonds M, Manu C, Vas P. The current burden of diabetic foot disease. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;17:88-93. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.017]
20. Zhao H, McClure NS, Johnson JA, Soprovich A, Al Sayah F, Eurich DT. A longitudinal study on the association between diabetic foot disease and health-related quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44(3):280-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.08.008]
21. Silva EQ, Suda EY, Santos DP, Veríssimo JL, Ferreira JSSP, Cruvinel Júnior RH, et al. Effect of an educational booklet for prevention and treatment of foot musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetic neuropathy: The footcare (FOCA) trial II, a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21:180. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-4115-8]
22. Lung CW, Wu FL, Liao F, Pu F, Fan Y, Jan YK. Emerging technologies for the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers. J Tissue Viability. 2020;29(2):61-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2020.03.003]
23. Adeyemi TM, Olatunji TL, Adetunji AE, Rehal S. Knowledge, practice and attitude towards foot ulcers and foot care among adults living with diabetes in tobago: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):8021. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18158021]
24. Sakre G, Kishanrao S. Management of diabetic foot ulcer-a case study. Glob J Obesity Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;8(1):1-5. [Link]
25. Liao CH. Evaluating the social marketing success criteria in health promotion: A f-dematel approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6317. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17176317]
26. Binte Aminuddin H, Jiao N, Jiang Y, Hong J, Wang W. Effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103286. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.003]
27. Khademian Z, Kazemi Ara F, Gholamzadeh S. The effect of self care education based on orem's nursing theory on quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with hypertension: A Quasi-experimental study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020;8(2):140-9. [Link]
28. Association Of Diabetes Care And Education Specialists; Kolb L. An effective model of diabetes care and education: The adces7 self-care behaviors™. Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2021;47(1):30-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0145721720978154]
29. American Association of Diabetes Educators. An effective model of diabetes care and education: revising the aade7 self-care behaviors®. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(2):139-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0145721719894903]
30. Yuan SLK, Couto LA, Marques AP. Effects of a six-week mobile app versus paper book intervention on quality of life, symptoms, and self-care in patients with fibromyalgia: A randomized parallel trial. Braz J Physical Ther. 2021;25(4):428-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.10.003]
31. CHRISMILASARI, Lucia Andi; NURSERY, Septi Machelia Champaca; NEGARA, Candra Kusuma. Self-efficacy and support from family self-care for individuals with high blood pressure. Jurnal EduHealth, 2024, 15.01: 53-60. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.