Volume 10, Issue 3 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(3): 489-496 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Balaghi E, Ghaffarifar S, Sohrabi A. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Short Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in Orthodontic Patients. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (3) :489-496
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-58538-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-58538-en.html
1- Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (1542 Views)
Aims: Orthodontic pain is the most common reason why patients request for ceasing treatment. This study was intended to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the SF-MPQ (P-SF-MPQ) after a translation and back-translation process.
Instrument & Methods: The items of the questionnaire were translated from English to Persian by an orthodontist and retranslated to English by another orthodontist. To determine the face validity and content validity, a questionnaire was prepared. The reliability of the research tool was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient. In order to assess the construct validity, 200 patients were asked to fill out the P-SF-MPQ.
Findings: Two items of SF-MPQ were omitted from the final version according to their low CVR. The mean of the CVI, CVR, and Impact Coefficient was obtained as 0.798, 0.53, and 3.29, respectively. To evaluate internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.851. To evaluate the stability of the results The ICC for the whole questionnaire was 0.848, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). The KMO value was calculated as 0.90, which indicates the appropriate sample size for exploratory factor analysis (KMO>0.6). The value of Chi-square was calculated as 108.52 which indicates the desirability of the model (p<0.001). Factor analysis showed that items of the P-SF-MPQ can be organized into three factors: chronic pain, beating pain, and sharp pain.
Conclusion: The results showed that the Persian version of the revised McGill Pain Scale in orthodontic patients is valid and can be used to evaluate orthodontic pain in Iranian patients.
Instrument & Methods: The items of the questionnaire were translated from English to Persian by an orthodontist and retranslated to English by another orthodontist. To determine the face validity and content validity, a questionnaire was prepared. The reliability of the research tool was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient. In order to assess the construct validity, 200 patients were asked to fill out the P-SF-MPQ.
Findings: Two items of SF-MPQ were omitted from the final version according to their low CVR. The mean of the CVI, CVR, and Impact Coefficient was obtained as 0.798, 0.53, and 3.29, respectively. To evaluate internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.851. To evaluate the stability of the results The ICC for the whole questionnaire was 0.848, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). The KMO value was calculated as 0.90, which indicates the appropriate sample size for exploratory factor analysis (KMO>0.6). The value of Chi-square was calculated as 108.52 which indicates the desirability of the model (p<0.001). Factor analysis showed that items of the P-SF-MPQ can be organized into three factors: chronic pain, beating pain, and sharp pain.
Conclusion: The results showed that the Persian version of the revised McGill Pain Scale in orthodontic patients is valid and can be used to evaluate orthodontic pain in Iranian patients.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Oral Health Education/Promotion
Received: 2022/01/9 | Accepted: 2022/04/28 | Published: 2022/07/9
Received: 2022/01/9 | Accepted: 2022/04/28 | Published: 2022/07/9
References
1. Oliver RG, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985;12(4):179-88. [Link] [DOI:10.1179/bjo.12.4.179]
2. Wiedel AP, Bondemark L. A randomized controlled trial of self-perceived pain, discomfort, and impairment of jaw function in children undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances. Angle Orthod 2016;86(2):324-30. [Link] [DOI:10.2319/040215-219.1]
3. Kavaliauskiene A, Smailiene D, Buskiene I, Keriene D. Pain and discomfort perception among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: results from one month follow-up study. Stomatologija. 2012;14(4):118-25. [Link]
4. Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(4):336-48. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(90)70106-M]
5. Tuncer Z, Ozsoy FS, Polat-Ozsoy O. Self-reported pain associated with the use of intermaxillary elastics compared to pain experienced after initial archwire placement. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(5):807-11. [Link] [DOI:10.2319/092110-550.1]
6. Tauheed S, Shaikh A. Correlation of pain perception and motivation to seek orthodontic treatment. Pak Orthod J. 2012;4(1):24-8. [Link]
7. Iwasaki LR, Freytag LE, Schumacher CA, Walker MP, Williams KB. Validation of a modified McGill Pain Questionnaire for orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(5):906-12. [Link] [DOI:10.2319/110812-859.1]
8. Campos LA, Santos-Pinto A, Marôco J, Campos JA. Pain perception in orthodontic patients: A model considering psychosocial and behavioural aspects. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2019;22(3):213-21. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/ocr.12315]
9. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5]
10. Grushka M, Sessle BJ. Applicability of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to the differentiation of 'toothache'pain. Pain. 1984;19(1):49-57. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(84)90064-2]
11. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8]
12. Gauthier LR, Young A, Dworkin RH, Rodin G, Zimmermann C, Warr D, et al. Validation of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire-2 in younger and older people with cancer pain. J Pain. 2014;15(7):756-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.04.004]
13. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x]
14. Bahadori F, Ghofranipour F, Ghaffarifar S, Ziaei R. Design and validation of brucellosis prevention questionnaire focused on animal vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:2. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-10014-x]
15. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical methods and analyses in health and biosciences a research methodological approach. Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications; 2011. [Link]
16. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Person Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x]
17. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall; 2002. [Link]
18. DiIorio CK. Measurement in health behavior: methods for research and evaluation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. [Link]
19. de Winter JC, Dodou DI, Wieringa PA. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res. 2009;44(2):147-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00273170902794206]
20. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Psychology Press; 2004. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781410610904]
21. Rigdon EE. Book review: structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. 1997;34(3):412-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/002224379703400311]
22. Loehlin JC, Beaujean AA. Latent variable models. New York: Routledge; 2017. [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9781315643199]
23. Hogarty KY, Hines CV, Kromrey JD, Ferron JM, Mumford KR. The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educ Psychol Measur. 2005;65(2):202-26. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0013164404267287]
24. Bagnato SJ, Neisworth JT. A national study of the social and treatment" invalidity" of intelligence testing for early intervention. Sch Psychol Q. 1994;9(2):81. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/h0088852]
25. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Trudeau JJ, Benson C, Biondi DM, Katz NP, et al. Validation of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in acute low back pain. J Pain. 2015;16(4):357-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.012]
26. Mehdizadeh M, Fereshtehnejad SM, Goudarzi S, Moshtagh A, Dehghanian Nasrabadi F, Habibi SA, Taghizadeh G. Validity and reliability of short-form McGill pain questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian people with Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's Dis. 2020;2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2020/2793945]
27. Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(7):1083-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10067-006-0452-6]
28. Burckhardt CS, Bjelle A. A Swedish version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1994;23(2):77-81. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/03009749409103032]
29. Kachooei AR, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Erfani-Sayyar R, Salehi M, Salimi E, Razi S. Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2): a cross-cultural adaptation and validation study of the Persian version in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2015;3(1):45. [Link]
30. Adelmanesh F, Jalali A, Attarian H, Farahani B, Ketabchi SM, Arvantaj A, et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity measures of expanded and revised version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian patients with neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. Pain Med. 2012;13(12):1631-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01517.x]
31. Nikniaz Z, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Ghaffarifar S, Saeedi Z, Akbari Namvar Z, Shirmohammadi M. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the celiac disease adherence test questionnaire. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):1-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12876-020-01396-8]
32. Rosas S, Paço M, Lemos C, Pinho T. Comparison between the Visual Analog Scale and the Numerical Rating Scale in the perception of esthetics and pain. Int orthod. 2017;15(4):543-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ortho.2017.09.027]
33. Tecco S, D'Attilio M, Tetè S, Festa F. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(4):380-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjp003]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |