Volume 9, Issue 5 (2021)
Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(5): 535-541 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fuster-Guillén D, Díaz Vergara C, Guillén Aparicio P, Graciela Barzola Loayza M, Alva Borjas M. Effect of Cognitive Learning Strategy on Academic Stress of the University Students in COVID-19 Context. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (5) :535-541
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-56403-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-56403-en.html
D. Fuster-Guillén *1, C.E. Díaz Vergara2, P.E. Guillén Aparicio3, M. Graciela Barzola Loayza4, M. Alva Borjas5
1- National University of San Marcos, Lima, Perú , dorisFusterGuillen85@gmail.com
2- Universidad César Vallejo, Lima, Perú
3- Universidad San Martín de Porres, Lima, Perú
4- Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú
5- Catholic University Los Angeles of Chimbote, Chimbote, Perú
2- Universidad César Vallejo, Lima, Perú
3- Universidad San Martín de Porres, Lima, Perú
4- Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Perú
5- Catholic University Los Angeles of Chimbote, Chimbote, Perú
Abstract: (1457 Views)
Aims: The conscious regulation of learning enables students to cope with academic, social and technological demands in times of COVID-19 pandemic in a positive or negative way. The aim was to explain the influence of cognitive learning strategy on academic stress in university students.
Instrument & Methods: This quantitative research with basic type a hypothetico-deductive method was performed. The sample of two hundred students (one student calculated through probability sampling) who were administered instruments with content and construct validity, as well as reliability by Cronbach's Alpha of 0.99 for learning strategies and academic stress.
Findings: The predominant cognitive strategy was information coding, considered risky because it produces high levels of stress, as well as idiosyncratic underlining, reviewing aloud and repeated review; while applications, metaphors, groupings and concept maps were considered protective, because they do not generate academic stress. Likewise, social interactions had a significant influence on the information processing support strategy.
Conclusion: The information coding, epigraphy, applications, searching for encodings, and social interactions strategies have the highest effect on cognitive learning, information acquisition indicators, information coding, information retrieval, and processing support, respectively.
Instrument & Methods: This quantitative research with basic type a hypothetico-deductive method was performed. The sample of two hundred students (one student calculated through probability sampling) who were administered instruments with content and construct validity, as well as reliability by Cronbach's Alpha of 0.99 for learning strategies and academic stress.
Findings: The predominant cognitive strategy was information coding, considered risky because it produces high levels of stress, as well as idiosyncratic underlining, reviewing aloud and repeated review; while applications, metaphors, groupings and concept maps were considered protective, because they do not generate academic stress. Likewise, social interactions had a significant influence on the information processing support strategy.
Conclusion: The information coding, epigraphy, applications, searching for encodings, and social interactions strategies have the highest effect on cognitive learning, information acquisition indicators, information coding, information retrieval, and processing support, respectively.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Communication
Received: 2021/10/16 | Accepted: 2021/12/9 | Published: 2022/02/12
Received: 2021/10/16 | Accepted: 2021/12/9 | Published: 2022/02/12
References
1. Pokhrel S, Chhetri R. A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. High Educ Future. 2021;8(1):133-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/2347631120983481]
2. Romero V, Palacios J, García S, Coayla E, Campos R, Salazar C. Social distancing and remote learning. Villarreal Chair. 2020. [Link]
3. Dreifuss Serrano C. Teaching-learning in the design workshop. Limaq. 2015;(1):67-92. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.26439/limaq2015.n001.354]
4. Zárate E, Soto, M, Martínez, E, Castro, M, García, R, López, N. Study habits and stress in health care students. FEM J Med Educ Foundation. 2018;21(3):153-7. [Link] [DOI:10.33588/fem.213.948]
5. Alarcón Díaz MA, Alcas Zapata N, Alarcón Diaz HH, Natividad JA, Rodríguez Fuentes A. Use of learning strategies in the university. a case study. Revista de psicología educative. 2019;7(1):10-32. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.265]
6. Visbal-Cadavid D, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Diaz Santana S. Learning strategies in higher education. Sophia. 2017;13(2):70-81. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.18634/sophiaj.13v.2i.461]
7. Lovón Cueva MA, Cisneros Terrones SA. Impact of virtual classes on university students in the context of covid-19 quarantine: The case of PUCP. Revista de psicología educativa . 2020;8(SPE3):e588. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE3.588]
8. Vélez-Loor MD, Vallejo-Valdivieso PA, Moya-Martínez MA. Virtual teaching resources in natural science projects during confinement period by COVID-19. EPISTEME KOINONIA. 2020;3(5):183-201. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.35381/e.k.v3i5.760]
9. Diaz-Narvaez VP, Calzadilla Nunez A. Scientific articles, types of research and scientific productivity in health sciences. Revista Ciencias de la Salud. 2016;14(1):115-21. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.12804/revsalud14.01.2016.10]
10. Restrepo J, Sánchez O, Castañeda T. Academic stress in university students. Psicoespacios. 2020;14(24):17. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.25057/21452776.1331]
11. Alfonso Aguila B, Calcines Castle M, Monteagudo De La Guardia R, Nieves Achon Z. Academic stress. Rev EDUMECENTRO. 2015;7(2):163-78. [Spanish] [Link]
12. Suarez-Montes N, Diaz-Subieta LB. Academic stress, dropout and retention strategies of students in higher education. Revista de Salud Pública. 2015;17(2):300-13. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.15446/rsap.v17n2.52891] [PMID]
13. Cabanach G, Souto A, Franco V. Academic stressors scale for the assessment of academic stressors in university students. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud. 2016;7(2):41-50. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.rips.2016.05.001]
14. Kaup S, Jain R, Shivalli S, Pandey S, Kaup S. Sustaining academics during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of online teaching-learning. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(6):1220-1. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Shahzad S, Hussain J, Sadaf N, Sarwat S, Ghani U, Saleem R. Impact of virtual teaching on ESL learners' attitudes under covid-19 circumstances at post graduate level in Pakistan. Engl Lang Teach. 2020;13(9):1. [Link] [DOI:10.5539/elt.v13n9p1]
16. Garcia, R. , Rector, M, Rodriguez, N, Rodriguez, G. (2011). "The institutional decisions to support remote learning and teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020 X International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV):2020, 1-5, doi:10.1109/JICV51605.2020.9375683. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/JICV51605.2020.9375683]
17. Moreno L, Solaguren M. Understanding and applying learning theories. Digital J Educ Teach Train. 2021;18:98-123. [Link]
18. Moreno G, Martínez R, Moreno M, Fernández M, Guadalupe S. Approach to learning theories in higher education. UNIANDES EPISTEME J Sci Technol Innov. 2017;4(1):48-60. [Link]
19. Orbegozo A. Intrinsic motivation according to Ryan & Deci and some recommendations for teachers. Educare, Revista Cientifica de Educação. 2016;2(1):75-93. [Portuguese] [Link] [DOI:10.19141/2447-5432/lumen.v2.n1.p.75-93]
20. Berrio García N, Mazo Zea R. Academic stress. Revista De Psicología Universidad De Antioquia. 2012;3(2):55-82. [Spanish] [Link]
21. González-Ramírez, M. T, García-Campayo, J, & Landero-Hernández, R. The role of stress transactional theory on the development of fibromyalgia: a structural equation model. Actas espanolas de psiquiatria. 2011;39(2):81-87. [Link]
22. Edo S, Rovira T, Maturano N, Fernández J. PASA (Primary Appraisal Secondary Appraisal) questionnaire for stress assessment; Spanish adaptation and instructions for use. Unknown Publisher. 2021. [Link]
23. Pérez Ruíz VC, La Cruz Zambrano AR. Strategies of teaching and learning of reading and writing in primary education. Zona Próxima. 2014;21(21):1-16. [Link] [DOI:10.14482/zp.21.5958]
24. Sánchez I, Pulgar J, Ramírez M. Cognitive strategies of meaningful learning in students of three degrees of Civil Engineering at the Universidad del Bío-Bío. Paradígma. 2015;36(2):122-45. [Spanish] [Link]
25. Valle A, González R, Cuevas L, Fernández A. Learning strategies: basic characteristics and their relevance in the school context. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 1998;(6):53-68. [Spanish] [Link]
26. Fernanda Silva-Ramos M, López-Cocotle JJ, Columba Meza-Zamora ME. Academic stress in university students. Fundación Dialnet. 2020;28(79):75-83. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.33064/iycuaa2020792960]
27. González Velázquez L. Academic stress in university students associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Espacio I+D, Innovación Más Desarrollo. 2020;9(25). [Spanish] [Link]
28. Estrada Araoz EG. Study habits and academic stress in students of a public educational institution in Puerto Maldonado. SOCIALIUM. 2020;4(2):47-62. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.26490/uncp.sl.2020.4.2.557]
29. Albo G. ACRA: scales of learning strategies of students of the course of animal production. I;IV National Congress and III International Congress of Agricultural Sciences Education, exhibition date September 2012. Unknown Publisher. 2012. [Link]
30. Román J, Gallego S. ACRA: learning strategies. Madrid: TEA. 2001. [Spanish] [Link]
31. Navarro Mosquera NG, Falconi Asanza AV, Espinoza Cordero J. The improvement of the assessment process of basic education students. Revista Universidad y Sociedad. 2017;9(4):58-69. [Spanish] [Link]
32. Abreu Y, Barrera A, Worosz T, Vichot I. The teaching-learning process of Language Studies: its impact on motivation towards language study. Mendive J Educ. 2018;16(4):610-23. [Link]
33. Ramos C. The paradigms of scientific research. Avances En Psicología. 2017;23(1):9-17. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.33539/avpsicol.2015.v23n1.167]
34. Miranda S, Ortiz J. Research paradigms: a theoretical approach to reflect from the field of educational research. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo. 2020;11(21). [Spanish] [Link]
35. Rutberg S, Bouikidis C. Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrol Nurs J. 2018;45(2):209-13. [Link]
36. Ramos C. The scopes of a research. CienciAmérica. 2020;9(3):1-6. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.33210/ca.v9i1.264]
37. Otzen T, Manterola C. Sampling techniques on a study population. Int J Morphol 2017;35(1):227-32. [Link] [DOI:10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037]
38. Jayasankara Reddy K, Rajan Menon K, Thattil A. Academic stress and its sources among University students. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11(1):531-7. [Link] [DOI:10.13005/bpj/1404]
39. Ortega F, Monserrat R, Martínez R. Estrategias de adquisición de información empleadas por estudiantes de Posgrado en Durango. Congreso Nacional de investigación Educativa. 2018. [Link]
40. Ortega Munoz F, Munoz Lopez MA, Vazquez Valenzuela D, Espinosa Sanchez DM. Information coding strategies employed by Mexican teachers in training processes. INNOVA Res J. 2017;2(10.1):70-84. [Spanish] [Link] [DOI:10.33890/innova.v2.n10.1.2017.540]
41. Ortega F. Strategies of information retrieval used by graduate students of the Centro de Actualización del Magisterio de Durango, Mexico - Postgraduate. Durango Network of Educational Researchers A.C. 2021. [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |