Volume 9, Issue 4 (2021)                   Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(4): 381-386 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karmanovskaya N. Public Environmental Monitoring of Drinking Water Quality in Norilsk, Russia. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (4) :381-386
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55985-en.html
“Department of Non-Ferrous Metallurgy” and “Department of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research”, Norilsk State Industrial Institute, Norilsk, Russian Federation , karmanovskaya6140@nuos.pro
Abstract:   (1345 Views)
Aims: Water quality is understood as the totality of its properties due to the nature and concentration of impurities in the water. Providing quality drinking water to citizens has become one of the most significant social problems and the most important factor of national security. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of drinking water in the city of Norilsk.
Materials & Methods: During the experiment, a team of researchers took samples of drinking water from the water supply network in various districts of the Norilsk industrial region (without preliminary draining and after 5 minutes of draining) and studied the dependence of the quality characteristics of water on the location and sampling method.
Findings: In terms of organoleptic indicators, drinking water in all Norilsk industrial region areas complies with the requirements of Sanitary Rules and Regulations and GOST. Sampling from three control points in the Norilsk industrial region showed that the water is soft, and its salt content is mainly due to hardness salts.
Conclusion: The presence of microorganisms in the water supply network of the Norilsk industrial region is not significant, and the permanganate oxidizability indicator does not exceed the requirements of Sanitary Rules and Regulations.
 
Full-Text [PDF 403 kb]   (1474 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (406 Views)  
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Social Health
Received: 2021/09/29 | Accepted: 2021/10/12 | Published: 2021/11/7
* Corresponding Author Address: Department of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, Norilsk State Industrial Institute, Norilsk, Russian Federation Postal code: 663310

References
1. Poryadin AF. Water supply lessons in Russia. Water Supply Sanit Mech. 2000;7:2-4. [Link]
2. Ducoste JJ, Alpert SM. Computational fluid dynamics modeling alternatives for UV-initiated advanced oxidation processes. Water Qual Res J. 2015;50(1):4-20. [Link] [DOI:10.2166/wqrjc.2014.035]
3. Sabliy L, Kuzminskiy Y, Zhukova V, Kozar M, Sobczuk H. New approaches in biological wastewater treatment aimed at removal of organic matter and nutrients. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(2):331-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1515/eces-2019-0023]
4. Icke O, Van Schagen K, Huising C, Wuister J, Van Dijk E, Budding A. Flow intake control using dry-weather forecast. Drink Water Eng Sci. 2017;10(2):69-74. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/dwes-10-69-2017]
5. Zhang D, Yang H, Lan S, Wang C, Li X, Xing Y, et al. Evolution of urban black and odorous water: The characteristics of microbial community and driving-factors. J Environ Sci. 2022;112:94-105. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2021.05.012]
6. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 292 "About the concept of the federal target program. "Provision of the population of Russia with drinking water" [Internet]. unknown publisher; 1998 [cited 2021, Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?doc_itself=&backlink=1&nd=102051969&page=1&rdk=0#I0. [Russian] [Link]
7. Taghlabi F, Sour L, Agoumi A. Prelocalization and leak detection in drinking water distribution networks using modeling-based algorithms: A case study for the city of Casablanca (Morocco). Drink Water Eng Sci. 2020;13(2):29-41. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/dwes-13-29-2020]
8. Akram N. Consumption of safe drinking water in Pakistan: Its dimensions and determinants. Drink Water Eng Sci 2020;13(2):43-50. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/dwes-13-43-2020]
9. Kuzmin SV, Vlasov IA, Kiyamova EL, Wagner IN. On the state of water supply in populated areas of the Sverdlovsk region. Water Treat Water Supply Prod Tech Sci Pract J. 2014;2:42-7. [Link]
10. Raheem SA, Alfatlawi AH. Surface-water purification using cellulose paper impregnated with silver nanoparticles. Drink Water Eng Sci. 2021;14(1):95-102. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/dwes-14-95-2021]
11. Dmitrieva VA, Buchik SV. Thermal regime of river water as a response to climatic processes in the Upper Don drainage basin. Arid Ecosyst. 2021;11(1):109-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1134/S2079096121010066]
12. Kramer OJI, De Moel PJ, Raaghav SKR, Baars ET, Van Vugt WH, Padding JT, et al. Can terminal settling velocity and drag of natural particles in water ever be predicted accurately? Drink Water Eng Sci. 2021;14(1):53-71. [Link] [DOI:10.5194/dwes-14-53-2021]
13. Shvets VY, Rozdobudko EV, Solomina GV. Aggregated methodology of multicriterion economic and ecological examination of the ecologically oriented investment projects. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2013;3: 139-144. [Ukrainian] [Link]
14. Achio S, Kutsanedzie F, Ameko E. Comparative analysis on the effectiveness of various filtration methods on the potability of water. Water Qual Res J. 2016;51(1):42-6. [Link] [DOI:10.2166/wqrjc.2015.014]
15. Abdelrasoul A, Doan H, Lohi A. Membrane fouling remediation in ultrafiltration of latex contaminated wastewater. Water Qual Res J. 2016;51(3):256-69. [Link] [DOI:10.2166/wqrjc.2015.011]
16. McFadyen S. Drinking water: Assessing and managing risk. Water Qual Res J. 2014;49(1):3-4. [Link] [DOI:10.2166/wqrjc.2013.011]
17. Saha RK, Ray M, Zhang C. Computational fluid dynamics simulation and parametric study of an open channel ultra-violet wastewater disinfection reactor. Water Qual Res J. 2015;50(1):58-71. [Link] [DOI:10.2166/wqrjc.2014.034]
18. Sokolyuk V, Ligomina I, Koziy V, Lototskyi V. Quality of drinking water for cows and their health. Sci Horiz. 2019;11(84): 101-7. [Ukrainian] [Link] [DOI:10.33249/2663-2144-2019-84-11-101-107]
19. Drozdova TM. Sanitation and food hygiene. Kemerovo: Kemerovo Technological Institute of Food Industry; 2005. [Ukrainian] [Link]
20. Alekseev LS, Gladkov VA. Improving the quality of soft waters. Moscow: Stroyizdat; 1994. [Russian] [Link]
21. Traube PR, Baranova AG. Chemistry and microbiology of water. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola; 1983. [Russian] [Link]
22. Barakbayev TT, Nurgazy KS, Badryzlova NS, Fedorov E, Assylbekova S. Variability of biological traits and fish capacity groups of three years old Russian sturgeons hatched in ponds. J Anim Vet Adv. 2015;14(6):175-81. [Link]
23. Komilova NK, Ravshanov AK, Karshibaeva LK, Ishankulova KQ, Madrahimova ZN. Some theoretical and practical issues of medical geographical research. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(3):2086-92. [Link]
24. David L, Wenlock M, Barton P, Ritzén A. Prediction of chameleonic efficiency. Chem Med Chem. 2021;16(17):2669-85. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/cmdc.202100306] [PMID]
25. Kazak R. Development of legal norms on biodiversity protection reflecting EU trends. Environl Policy Law. 2017;47(3-4):147-52. [Link] [DOI:10.3233/EPL-170032]
26. Kwilinski A, Ruzhytskyi I, Patlachuk V, Patlachuk O, Kaminska B. Environmental taxes as a condition of business responsibility in the conditions of sustainable development. J Leg Ethic Regulatory Issue. 2019;22(Special Issue 2):1-6. [Link]
27. Krupnova EA, Krupnov PA, Nesterova IV, Mashkova IV. Study of the salinity of drinking water. Young Scientist. 2016;1:37-9. [Russian] [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.