Volume 10, Issue 1 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(1): 89-97 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nopour R, Kazemi-Arpanahi H, Shanbehzadeh M. Discovering the Clinical Knowledge about Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Rule-Based Machine Learning Algorithms. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (1) :89-97
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55598-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55598-en.html
1- Department of Health Information Management, Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Information Technology, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
3- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
2- Department of Health Information Technology, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
3- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Abstract: (1680 Views)
Aims: Breast cancer represents one of the most prevalent cancers and is also the main cause of cancer-related deaths in women globally. Thus, this study was aimed to construct and compare the performance of several rule-based machine learning algorithms in predicting breast cancer.
Instrument & Methods: The data were collected from the Breast Cancer Registry database in the Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Abadan, Iran, from December 2017 to January 2021 and had information from 949 non-breast cancer and 554 breast cancer cases. Then the mean values and K-nearest neighborhood algorithm were used for replacing the lost quantitative and qualitative data fields, respectively. In the next step, the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used for feature selection. Finally, the best rule-based machine learning algorithm was obtained based on comparing different evaluation criteria. The Rapid Miner Studio 7.1.1 and Weka 3.9 software were utilized.
Findings: As a result of feature selection the nine variables were considered as the most important variables for data mining. Generally, the results of comparing rule-based machine learning demonstrated that the J-48 algorithm with an accuracy of 0.991, F-measure of 0.987, and also AUC of 0.9997 had a better performance than others.
Conclusion: It’s found that J-48 facilitates a reasonable level of accuracy for correct BC risk prediction. We believe it would be beneficial for designing intelligent decision support systems for the early detection of high-risk patients that will be used to inform proper interventions by the clinicians.
Instrument & Methods: The data were collected from the Breast Cancer Registry database in the Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital, Abadan, Iran, from December 2017 to January 2021 and had information from 949 non-breast cancer and 554 breast cancer cases. Then the mean values and K-nearest neighborhood algorithm were used for replacing the lost quantitative and qualitative data fields, respectively. In the next step, the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used for feature selection. Finally, the best rule-based machine learning algorithm was obtained based on comparing different evaluation criteria. The Rapid Miner Studio 7.1.1 and Weka 3.9 software were utilized.
Findings: As a result of feature selection the nine variables were considered as the most important variables for data mining. Generally, the results of comparing rule-based machine learning demonstrated that the J-48 algorithm with an accuracy of 0.991, F-measure of 0.987, and also AUC of 0.9997 had a better performance than others.
Conclusion: It’s found that J-48 facilitates a reasonable level of accuracy for correct BC risk prediction. We believe it would be beneficial for designing intelligent decision support systems for the early detection of high-risk patients that will be used to inform proper interventions by the clinicians.
Keywords: Machine Learning [MeSH], Artificial Intelligence [MeSH], Data Mining [MeSH], Breast Neoplasms [MeSH], Decision Tree [MeSH]
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Technology of Health Education
Received: 2021/09/14 | Accepted: 2021/11/28 | Published: 2022/04/10
Received: 2021/09/14 | Accepted: 2021/11/28 | Published: 2022/04/10
References
1. Dhahri H, Al Maghayreh E, Mahmood A, Elkilani W, Faisal Nagi M. Automated breast cancer diagnosis based on machine learning algorithms. J Healthcare Eng. 2019;2019:4253641. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2019/4253641]
2. Salod Z, Singh Y. Comparison of the performance of machine learning algorithms in breast cancer screening and detection: A protocol. J Public Health Res. 2019;8(3):1677. [Link] [DOI:10.4081/jphr.2019.1677]
3. Homan SG, Yun S, Bouras A, Schmaltz C, Gwanfogbe P, Lucht J. Breast cancer population screening program results in early detection and reduced treatment and health care costs for medicaid. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(1):70-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001041]
4. Anwar SL, Dwianingsih EK, Avanti WS, Choridah L, Suwardjo, Aryandono T. Aggressive behavior of Her-2 positive colloid breast carcinoma:A case report in a metastatic breast cancer. Annal Med Surg. 2020;52:48-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.010]
5. Babiera GV. Metastatic breast cancer. A paradigm shift toward a more aggressive approach. Cancer J. 2009;15(1):78. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/PPO.0b013e318197686b]
6. Maeshima Y, Osako T, Morizono H, Yunokawa M, Miyagi Y, Kikuchi M, et al. Metastatic ovarian cancer spreading into mammary ducts mimicking an in situ component of primary breast cancer:a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2021;15(1):1-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13256-020-02653-w]
7. Franzoi MA, Rosa DD, Zaffaroni F, Werutsky G, Simon S, Bines J, et al. Advanced stage at diagnosis and worse clinicopathologic features in young women with breast cancer in Brazil: a subanalysis of the amazona III study (GBECAM 0115). J Global Oncol. 2019, 5:1-10. [Link] [DOI:10.1200/JGO.19.00263]
8. Tesfaw A, Getachew S, Addissie A, Jemal A, Wienke A, Taylor L, et al. Late-stage diagnosis and associated factors among breast cancer patients in south and southwest ethiopia: a multicenter study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(1):e112-e9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2020.08.011]
9. Gebremariam A, Addissie A, Worku A, Assefa M, Kantelhardt EJ, Jemal A. Perspectives of patients, family members, and health care providers on late diagnosis of breast cancer in Ethiopia: A qualitative study. PloS One. 2019;14(8):e0220769. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0220769]
10. Domeyer PRJ, Sergentanis TN. New insights into the screening, prompt diagnosis, management, and prognosis of breast cancer. J Oncol. 2020;2020:8597892. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2020/8597892]
11. Badiger S, Moger J. A comparative study of mammography, sonography and infrared thermography in detection of cancer in breast. Int Surg J.2020;7(6):1886-92. [Link] [DOI:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202401]
12. Mohamed NC, Moey SF, Lim BC. Validity and reliability of health belief model questionnaire for promoting breast self-examination and screening mammogram for early cancer detection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevent. 2019;20(9):2865-73. [Link] [DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2865]
13. Anderson BO, Bevers TB, Carlson RW. Clinical breast examination and breast cancer screening guideline. JAMA. 2016;315(13):1403-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.0686]
14. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Regan MM, Dodson A, Viale G, Thürlimann B, et al. Integration of clinical variables for the prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy: CTS5. J Clini Oncol. 2018;36(19):1941-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4258]
15. Tseng YJ, Huang CE, Wen CN, Lai PY, Wu MH, Sun YC, et al. Predicting breast cancer metastasis by using serum biomarkers and clinicopathological data with machine learning technologies. Int J Med Inform. 2019;128:79-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.003]
16. Tran WT, Sadeghi-Naini A, Lu FI, Gandhi S, Meti N, Brackstone M, et al. Computational radiology in breast cancer screening and diagnosis using artificial intelligence. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(1):98-108. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0846537120949974]
17. Elwood JM. Drug and hormone resistance in neoplasia. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019. pp. 39-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1201/9780429262333-2]
18. Sathya D, Sudha V, Jagadeesan D. Handbook of research on applications and implementations of machine learning techniques. Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2020. p. 289-304. [Link] [DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-9902-9.ch015]
19. Bradley A, Van Der Meer R, McKay C. Personalized pancreatic cancer management: a systematic review of how machine learning is supporting decision-making. Pancreas. 2019;48(5):598-604. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001312]
20. Prasuna K, Rama RK, Saibaba C. Application of machine learning techniques in predicting breast cancer - A survey. Int J Innov Technol Exploring Eng. 2019;8(8):826-32. [Link]
21. Yue W, Wang Z, Chen H, Payne A, Liu X. Machine learning with applications in breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Designs. 2018;2(2):1-17. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/designs2020013]
22. Peng J, Zeng X, Townsend J, Liu G, Huang Y, Lin S. A machine learning approach to uncovering hidden utilization patterns of early childhood dental care among medicaid-insured children. Front Public Health. 2021;8:1025. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.599187]
23. Singh NK. Prediction of breast cancer using rule based classification. Appl Med Inform. 2015;37(4):11-22. [Link]
24. Tian JX, Zhang J. Breast cancer diagnosis using feature extraction and boosted C5.0 decision tree algorithm with penalty factor. Math Biosci Eng. 2022;19(3):2193-205. [Link] [DOI:10.3934/mbe.2022102]
25. Idris NF, Ismail MA. Breast cancer disease classification using fuzzy-ID3 algorithm with FUZZYDBD method: automatic fuzzy database definition. Peer J Comput Sci. 2021;7:e427. [Link] [DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.427]
26. Momenyan S, Baghestani AR, Momenyan N, Naseri P, Akbari ME. Survival prediction of patients with breast cancer:comparisons of decision tree and logistic regression analysis. Int J Cancer Manag. 2018;11(7). [Link] [DOI:10.5812/ijcm.9176]
27. Silva J, Lezama OBP, Varela N, Borrero LA. Integration of data mining classification techniques and ensemble learning for predicting the type of breast cancer recurrence. International Conference on Green, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing. Springer; 2019. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-19223-5_2]
28. Mohammed A, Arunachalam N. Imbalanced machine learning based techniques for breast cancer detection. 2021 International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), 30-31 July 2021, Puducherry, India. Piscataway: IEEE; 2021. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/ICSCAN53069.2021.9526422]
29. Solanki Y, Chakrabarti P, Jasinski M, Leonowicz Z, Bolshev V, Vinogradov A, et al. A hybrid supervised machine learning classifier system for breast cancer prognosis using feature selection and data imbalance handling approaches. Electronics. 2021;10(6):699. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/electronics10060699]
30. Chaurasia V, Pal S. Applications of machine learning techniques to predict diagnostic breast cancer. SN Comput Sci. 2020;1(5):1-11. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s42979-020-00296-8]
31. Mohammed SA, Darrab S, Noaman SA, Saake G. Analysis of breast cancer detection using different machine learning techniques. International Conference on Data Mining and Big Data. 2020;1234:108-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-7205-0_10]
32. Alickovic E, Subasi A. Comparison of decision tree methods for breast cancer diagnosis. The 6th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT 2013), Amman, Jordan. Unknown Publisher; 2013. [Link]
33. Dawngliani M, Chandrasekaran N, Lalmuanawma S, Thangkhanhau H. Prediction of breast cancer recurrence using ensemble machine learning classifiers. International Conference on Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services; 2019:232-44. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-46828-6_20]
34. Saabith ALS, Sundararajan E, Bakar AA. Comparative study on different classification techniques for breast cancer dataset. Int J Comput Sc Mob Comput. 2014;3(10):185-91. [Link]
35. Al-Salihy NK, Ibrikci T. Classifying breast cancer by using decision tree algorithms. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, Unknown Date & location. Unknown Publisher; 2017. [Link] [DOI:10.1145/3056662.3056716]
36. Ortega JHJC, Resureccion MR, Natividad LRQ, Bantug ET, Lagman AC, Lopez SR. An analysis of classification of breast cancer dataset using J48 algorithm. Int J Adv Trends Comput Scie Eng. 2020;9(3):178-85. [Link] [DOI:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/7591.32020]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |