Volume 10, Issue 2 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(2): 285-294 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shirzad M, Hajimiri K, Abedini M, Shakibazadeh E. Acceptability of a Mobile App-Based Intervention Program for Choosing Mode of Delivery among Pregnant Women. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (2) :285-294
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55496-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55496-en.html
1- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
3- Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
3- Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1627 Views)
Aims: Maternal health and pregnancy outcomes are vitally important areas of each country's healthcare system. This study aimed to investigate the acceptability of a mobile app-based intervention program for choosing the mode of delivery among pregnant women.
Materials & Method: Thirty pregnant women participated in this study. The Mobile App-Based Program focused on facilitating choosing mode of delivery based on information, motivation, and behavior model among pregnant women in Tehran, Iran. A retrospective post-intervention study was carried out. We used quantitative and qualitative semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of women participating in the Mobile app-based program and investigate the intervention's acceptability.
Finding: Quantitative result has shown that 76.6% of the users assessed the application as usable. In the qualitative section of the study, three main themes were emerged: 1- specific features of the App (images, text, colors, and etc.); 2- advantages (distance learning method, reliability, and credibility, being user-friendly and comfortability, time-saving, and being interactive); and 3- disadvantages (fear of mobile radiation on fetus, poor internet connection, and limited audience) regarding using of the intervention.
Conclusion: This mobile application eased women's knowledge and behavior and satisfied them, specifically during the new-emerged pandemic. It also helped women to clarify their thoughts regarding their choice on mode of delivery. Participants suggested some shortages using the application that should be noticed.
Materials & Method: Thirty pregnant women participated in this study. The Mobile App-Based Program focused on facilitating choosing mode of delivery based on information, motivation, and behavior model among pregnant women in Tehran, Iran. A retrospective post-intervention study was carried out. We used quantitative and qualitative semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of women participating in the Mobile app-based program and investigate the intervention's acceptability.
Finding: Quantitative result has shown that 76.6% of the users assessed the application as usable. In the qualitative section of the study, three main themes were emerged: 1- specific features of the App (images, text, colors, and etc.); 2- advantages (distance learning method, reliability, and credibility, being user-friendly and comfortability, time-saving, and being interactive); and 3- disadvantages (fear of mobile radiation on fetus, poor internet connection, and limited audience) regarding using of the intervention.
Conclusion: This mobile application eased women's knowledge and behavior and satisfied them, specifically during the new-emerged pandemic. It also helped women to clarify their thoughts regarding their choice on mode of delivery. Participants suggested some shortages using the application that should be noticed.
Keywords: Patient Acceptance of Health Care [MeSH], Mobile Application [MeSH], Cesarean Section [MeSH]
Article Type: Qualitative Research |
Subject:
Family Health Education/Promotion
Received: 2021/09/11 | Accepted: 2022/01/5 | Published: 2022/06/14
Received: 2021/09/11 | Accepted: 2022/01/5 | Published: 2022/06/14
References
1. Bush J, Barlow DE, Echols J, Wilkerson J, Bellevin K. Impact of a mobile health application on user engagement and pregnancy outcomes among Wyoming Medicaid members. Telemed J E Health. 2017;23(11):891-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/tmj.2016.0242]
2. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148343. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343]
3. Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Hajimiri K, Betran AP, Jahanfar S, Bohren MA, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):3. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x]
4. Shearer EL. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37(10):1223-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90334-Z]
5. Rashidian A, Moradi G, Takian A, Sakha MA, Salavati S, Faraji O, et al. Effects of the health transformation plan on caesarean section rate in the Islamic Republic of Iran: an interrupted time series. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(4): [Link] [DOI:10.26719/emhj.18.044]
6. Eng DS, Lee JM. The promise and peril of mobile health applications for diabetes and endocrinology. Pediatr Diabetes. 2013;14(4):231-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/pedi.12034]
7. Setiawan R, Kisman Z, Al Faruq U, Chaidir Q. Design mobile application for health consultation during pandemic Covid 19. Int J Adv Trends Comput Sci Eng. 2020;9(4):4241-4. [Link]
8. Oliver N, Lepri B, Sterly H, Lambiotte R, Deletaille S, De Nadai M, et al. Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle. Sci Adv. 2020;6(23):eabc0764. [Link] [DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764]
9. Silva BMC, Rodrigues JJPC, de la Torre Díez I, López-Coronado M, Saleem K. Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. J Biomed Inform 2015;56:265-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003]
10. Silva BM, Lopes IM, Rodrigues JJ, Ray P, editors. SapoFitness: A mobile health application for dietary evaluation. 2011 IEEE 13th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services. Pictaway: IEEE; 2011. [Link] [DOI:10.1109/HEALTH.2011.6026782]
11. Hamidi H, Chavoshi A. Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: a case study of students of the university of technology. Telemat Inform. 2018;35(4):1053-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.016]
12. Olajubu AO, Fajemilehin BR, Olajubu TO, Afolabi BS. Effectiveness of a mobile health intervention on uptake of recommended postnatal care services in Nigeria. Plos one. 2020;15(9):e0238911. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0238911]
13. Han M, Lee E. Effectiveness of mobile health application use to improve health behavior changes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Healthc Inform Res. 2018;24(3):207-26. [Link] [DOI:10.4258/hir.2018.24.3.207]
14. Palermo TM, de la Vega R, Dudeney J, Murray C, Law E. Mobile health intervention for self-management of adolescent chronic pain (WebMAP mobile): Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;74:55-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2018.10.003]
15. Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363]
16. Vassilev I, Rowsell A, Pope C, Kennedy A, O'Cathain A, Salisbury C, et al. Assessing the implementability of telehealth interventions for self-management support: a realist review. Implement Sci. 2015;10:59. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0238-9]
17. Lyles CR, Harris LT, Le T, Flowers J, Tufano J, Britt D, et al. Qualitative evaluation of a mobile phone and web-based collaborative care intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(5):563-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/dia.2010.0200]
18. Torbjørnsen A, Ribu L, Rønnevig M, Grøttland A, Helseth S. Users' acceptability of a mobile application for persons with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1-14. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4486-2]
19. Bozorgi A, Hosseini H, Eftekhar H, Majdzadeh R, Yoonessi A, Ramezankhani A, et al. The effect of the mobile "blood pressure management application" on hypertension self-management enhancement: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):413. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05270-0]
20. Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Rahimi Foroushani A, Abedini M, Poursharifi H, Babaei S. Effect of "motivational interviewing" and "information, motivation, and behavioral skills" counseling interventions on choosing the mode of delivery in pregnant women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):970. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-04865-3]
21. Rahnama P, Mohammadi K, Montazeri A. Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran. Reprod Health. 2016;13:7. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12978-016-0120-5]
22. Poorman E, Gazmararian J, Parker RM, Yang B, Elon L. Use of text messaging for maternal and infant health: a systematic review of the literature. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(5):969-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10995-014-1595-8]
23. Ortiz S, Green M. Trends and patterns of mobile learning: A study of mobile learning management system access. Turk On J Dis Educ. 2019;20(1):161-76. [Link] [DOI:10.17718/tojde.522464]
24. Makoe M, Shandu T. Developing a mobile app for learning English vocabulary in an open distance learning context. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2018;19(4). [Link] [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3746]
25. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Intern Res. 2013;15(4):e86. [Link] [DOI:10.2196/jmir.2583]
26. Huckvale K, Prieto JT, Tilney M, Benghozi PJ, Car J. Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med. 2015;13:214. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y]
27. Bert F, Giacometti M, Gualano MR, Siliquini R. Smartphones and health promotion: a review of the evidence. J Med Syst. 2014;38(1):9995. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10916-013-9995-7]
28. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1-2):24-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006]
29. Yuill C, McCourt C, Cheyne H, Leister N. Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):343. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-03023-6]
30. Peng W, Kanthawala S, Yuan S, Hussain SA. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1158. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3808-0]
31. Sampat BH, Prabhakar B. Privacy risks and security threats in mHealth apps. J Int Technol Inf Manag. 2017;26(4):126-53. [Link]
32. He D, Naveed M, Gunter CA, Nahrstedt K. Security concerns in Android mHealth apps. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014;2014:645-54. [Link]
33. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Olsen J. Prenatal cell phone use and developmental milestone delays among infants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;27(4):341-8. [Link] [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3157]
34. Guxens M, van Eijsden M, Vermeulen R, Loomans E, Vrijkotte TGM, Komhout H, et al. Maternal cell phone and cordless phone use during pregnancy and behaviour problems in 5-year-old children. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(5):432-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1136/jech-2012-201792]
35. Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Forns J, Guxens M, Julvez J, Ferrer M, et al. Brief Report: Prenatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Neurodevelopment at 14 Months. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):259-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181cb41e0]
36. Shirzad M, Shakibazadeh E, Hajimiri K, Betran AP, Jahanfar S, Bohren MA, et al. Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in Iran: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):3. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12978-020-01047-x]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |