Volume 9, Issue 4 (2021)
Health Educ Health Promot 2021, 9(4): 335-342 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shlyk K, Belonozhko L, Gyurdzhinyan A. Social Health of the Arctic Zone Population, Russia. Health Educ Health Promot 2021; 9 (4) :335-342
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55448-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55448-en.html
1- Department of Marketing and Public Administration, Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation , k.shlyk6609-5@nuos.pro
2- Department of Marketing and Public Administration, Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation
2- Department of Marketing and Public Administration, Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation
Abstract: (1502 Views)
Aims: Social health is a person's internal state that determines his ability to communicate with society. The purpose of the study was to find a link between the population's health status and the social development of the Arctic regions in the Russian Federation.
Ideas & Methods: The content of the term social health may change depending on the disciplinary field. There are two main methods to define it; in a broader sense as an analog of social moods, and in a narrower sense, as the emergence of subjective wellbeing.
Findings: Socio-demographic characteristics of the social health of the Russian population showed a negative trend in the growth of crime and drug addiction in the country.
Conclusion: Special attention should be paid to the importance of individual human behavior in determining social health. Each person has unique health factors, depending on age, gender, social status, and financial situation. Lifestyle plays an important role in a healthy lifestyle.
Ideas & Methods: The content of the term social health may change depending on the disciplinary field. There are two main methods to define it; in a broader sense as an analog of social moods, and in a narrower sense, as the emergence of subjective wellbeing.
Findings: Socio-demographic characteristics of the social health of the Russian population showed a negative trend in the growth of crime and drug addiction in the country.
Conclusion: Special attention should be paid to the importance of individual human behavior in determining social health. Each person has unique health factors, depending on age, gender, social status, and financial situation. Lifestyle plays an important role in a healthy lifestyle.
Keywords: Community Health Services [MeSH], Occupational Health Services [MeSH], Health Policy [MeSH], Social Welfare [MeSH], Public Opinion [MeSH]
Article Type: Literature Review |
Subject:
Social Health
Received: 2021/09/9 | Accepted: 2021/09/18 | Published: 2021/11/6
Received: 2021/09/9 | Accepted: 2021/09/18 | Published: 2021/11/6
References
1. Hlushchenko NV. Modern issues of administrative law. Leg Horiz. 2021;14(2):124-9. [Link]
2. Kuchenkova AV. Social wellbeing and subjective wellbeing: The ratio of concepts and methods of measurement. Vestnik RGGU. Ser: Philos Sociol Art Crit. 2016;2(4):118-27. [Russian] [Link] [DOI:10.28995/2073-6401-2016-2-118-127]
3. Balatsky EV. Methods for diagnosing social wellbeing of the population. Monit Pub Opin: Econ Soc Changes. 2005;3:47-53. [Russian] [Link]
4. Kozyreva PM. Social adaptation of the population of Russia in the post-Soviet period. Sociological Studies. 2017;6:24-35. [Russian] [Link]
5. Gumenyuk T, Palchynska M, Herchanivska P, Kozak Y, Kobyzhcha N. Overcoming the modern socio-cultural crisis - From postmodern to post-postmodern: Theoretical aspects. Int J Criminol Soc. 2021;10:745-52. [Link] [DOI:10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.88]
6. Tsivatyi V, Martsyniuk M. Foreign affairs and historical challenges of the mondialized world of Europe in the context of the spread of the covid-19 pandemic: migration and diasporal aspects. Foreign Aff. 2021;3-4:5-8. [Link]
7. Bulysheva DV. Improvement of recreational land use as an element of urban agglomerations' sustainable development. Actual Probl Econ. 2015;172(10):261-9. [Link]
8. Bondar I, Gumenyuk T, Horban Y, Karakoz O, Chaikovska O. Distance E-learning in the system of professional development of corporation managers: Challenges of COVID-19. J Educ e-Learn Res. 2021;7(4):456-63. [Link] [DOI:10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.456.463]
9. Bondar I, Humeniuk T, Batchenko L, Horban Y, Honchar L. State regulation of the development of educational and scientific process in higher education institutions. J Manage Inf Decis Sci. 2021;24(2):1-10. [Link]
10. Khaustova Y, Breus S, Nevmerzhytska S, Tsalko T, Kharchenko T. Features of social entrepreneurship as a factor in the development of social innovation. J Entrepreneurship Educ. 2019;22(1S):1-6. [Link]
11. Kravchenko LV. Development of noxological culture in students teaching occupational safety and health in pedagogical institutions of higher education. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univ Ser Pedag Psychol. 2021;7(1):63-70. [Link] [DOI:10.52534/msu-pp.7(1).2021.63-70]
12. Ayvazyan SA. Integral indicators of the quality of life of the population: their construction and use in socio-economic management and interregional comparisons. Moscow: TSEMI RAN; 2000. [Russian] [Link]
13. Badoux A, Mendelsohn GA. Subjective wellbeing in French and American samples: Scale development and comparative data. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(6):395-401. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF00435391] [PMID]
14. Kulakhmetova GA, Shcherbakova NA, Tsypko VV. Modeling and optimization of socio-economic aspects for the development of tourism. J Envir Manage Tourism. 2018;9(8):1696-705. [Link] [DOI:10.14505//jemt.v9.8(32).08]
15. Nagelhout GE, Abidi L, De Vries H. How do health and social networks compare between low-income multiproblem households and the general population? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):4967. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16244967] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Predmore Z, Hatef E, Weiner JP. Integrating social and behavioral determinants of health into population health analytics. A conceptual framework and suggested road map. Popul Health Managt. 2019;22(6):488-94. [Link] [DOI:10.1089/pop.2018.0151] [PMID]
17. Osipova OV, Maklashova EG. Migration intentions of youth in the Arctic in the context of subjective assessments of social wellbeing. Arct North. 2016;24:13-24. [Link] [DOI:10.17238/issn2221-2698.24.14]
18. Romashkina GF, Kryzhanovsky OA, Romashkin GS. Assessment of the components of social wellbeing of the population of the Arctic region. MIR (Modernization Innov Dev). 2016;6(4):58-63. [Link] [DOI:10.18184/2079-4665.2015.6.4.58.63]
19. Schwartz SH. Cultural value orientations: The nature and consequences of national differences. Psychology. J High Sch Econ. 2008;5(2):37-67. [Link]
20. Martynenko V. Ecological and fire characteristics of forest ecosystems of the "Drevlyansky" nature reserve. Sci Horiz. 2021;24(1):85-92. [Link] [DOI:10.48077/scihor.24(1).2021.85-92]
21. Badaev M. Public-private partnership in healthcare and pharmaceutical sector of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univ. Ser Econ. 2021;8(2):45-55. [Link] [DOI:10.52566/msu-econ.8(2).2021.45-55]
22. Inglehart R. Postmodernity: Changing values and changing societies. Polis: Polit Stud. 1997;4:6-23. [Russian] [Link]
23. Hofstede G. Hofstede's model in context: Parameters of the quantitative characteristics of cultures. Lang, Commun Soc Environ. 2014;12:9-49. [Link]
24. Doyle O, Hegarty M, Owens C. Population-based system of parenting support to reduce the prevalence of child social, emotional, and behavioural problems: Difference-in-differences study. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):772-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11121-018-0907-4] [PMID]
25. Volkova P, Luginina A, Saenko N, Samusenkov V. Virtual reality: Pro et contra. J Soc Stud Educ Res. 2020;11(4):190-203. [Link]
26. Nguyen H, Nguyen T, Nguyen DT. An empirical study on prediction of population health through social media. J Biomed Inform. 2019;99(4):103277. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103277] [PMID]
27. Beckfield J, Morris KA, Bambra C. How social policy contributes to the distribution of population health: The case of gender health equity. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(1):6-17. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1403494817715954] [PMID]
28. Asan D, Batyrova N, Aubakirova A, Abishov N, Kuralbayev A. Implementation of a comparative evaluation method of stable socio-economic development. Int J Econ Fin Issues. 2016;6(2):9-13. [Link]
29. Santalova MS, Lesnikova E, Nechaeva S, Sadykova K, Nizovaya I. Crisis of the consumer basket in Russia. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2019;57:852-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_92]
30. Yarotskiy VL, Dreval YuD, Zaika SO. System signs of statutory regulation of occupational health and safety in the republic of Poland. J Nation Acad Leg Sci Ukr. 2021;28(3):238-47. [Link] [DOI:10.37635/jnalsu.28(3).2021.238-247]
31. Belyaeva LA. The level and quality of life. Measurement and interpretation problems. Sociol Stud. 2009;1:33-42. [Russian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |