Volume 10, Issue 3 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(3): 427-431 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Asadi Z, Abdi N, Miri S, Safari A. Predictors of Behavioral Intention for Pap Smear Testing Based on the Theory of Protection Motivation in Women. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (3) :427-431
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-54167-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-54167-en.html
1- School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Gynecology, AJA University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
2- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Gynecology, AJA University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1524 Views)
Aims: One of the cancers that threaten women's health is cervical cancer. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of the behavioral intention of Pap smear testing based on the theory of protective motivation in women.
Instrument & Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study. Participants in this study were 300 women referring to public clinics in one of the selected hospitals in Tehran. In this study, a reliable and valid questionnaire based on protection motivation theory was used to collect information. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 19 as well as a correlation test and stepwise regression.
Findings: The findings revealed that the correlation coefficients of perceived sensitivity (r=0.47), perceived intensity (r=0.53), fear (r=0.46), response costs (r=0.54), response efficiency (r=0.2), self-efficacy (r=0.53), and behavioral intent were significant at a confidence level of 0.99 and in a positive direction. The ability of behavioral intention prediction for response costs (26.2%), self-efficacy (11.6%), fear (1.8%), and perceived sensitivity (3.2%) was recorded, these variables can predict about 42.8% of changes in behavioral intention for Pap smear testing.
Conclusion: The behavioral intent of having a pap smear testing can be predicted based on the theory of protective motivation in women. Therefore, designing educational programs within the framework of this theory is recommended to improve Pap smear testing.
Instrument & Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study. Participants in this study were 300 women referring to public clinics in one of the selected hospitals in Tehran. In this study, a reliable and valid questionnaire based on protection motivation theory was used to collect information. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 19 as well as a correlation test and stepwise regression.
Findings: The findings revealed that the correlation coefficients of perceived sensitivity (r=0.47), perceived intensity (r=0.53), fear (r=0.46), response costs (r=0.54), response efficiency (r=0.2), self-efficacy (r=0.53), and behavioral intent were significant at a confidence level of 0.99 and in a positive direction. The ability of behavioral intention prediction for response costs (26.2%), self-efficacy (11.6%), fear (1.8%), and perceived sensitivity (3.2%) was recorded, these variables can predict about 42.8% of changes in behavioral intention for Pap smear testing.
Conclusion: The behavioral intent of having a pap smear testing can be predicted based on the theory of protective motivation in women. Therefore, designing educational programs within the framework of this theory is recommended to improve Pap smear testing.
Keywords: Protective Factors [MeSH], Intention [MeSH], Pap Smear [MeSH], Uterine Cervical Neoplasms [MeSH]
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Education and Health Behavior
Received: 2021/07/8 | Accepted: 2022/04/5 | Published: 2022/07/3
Received: 2021/07/8 | Accepted: 2022/04/5 | Published: 2022/07/3
References
1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: Globocan 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893-917. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/ijc.25516]
2. Aalam M, Alizadeh Sakineh M, Aflatounian MR, Azizzadeh Forouzi M. Knowledge, attitude and practice of behvarzes working in healthcare centers of Kerman medical science university toward pap smear. Hormozgan Med J. 2007;10(4):379-86. [Persian] [Link]
3. Yakhforushha A, Solhi M, Ebadi Frad Azar F. Effects of education via health belief model on knowledge and attitude of voluntary health workers regarding pap smear in urban centers of Qazvin. Adv Nurs Midwifery. 2009;18(63):27-33. [Persian] [Link]
4. Reis N, Bebiş H, Köse S, Sis A, Engin R, Yavan T. Knowledge, behavior and beliefs related to cervical cancer and screening among Turkish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(4):1463-70. [Link] [DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.4.1463]
5. Ganji F, Taheri S, Shahrani M, Sadegi M, Khadivi R. The evaluation of papanicolaou (pap) smear processing in the health centers of Shahrekord in 2005. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2007;9(1):16-22. [Persian] [Link]
6. Wright Jr TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2120-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1001/jama.287.16.2120]
7. William R K, Marian D. Disorders of the uterine cervix. In: Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Danforth DN, editors. Danforth's obstetrics and genicology. 9th Edition. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 923-5. [Link]
8. Yu CK, Rymer J. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer. Br J Fam Plann. 1998;23(4):127-33. [Link]
9. Allahverdipour H, Emami A. Perceptions of cervical cancer threat, benefits, and barriers of papanicolaou smear screening programs for women in Iran. Women Health. 2008;47(3):23-37. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.1080/03630240802132302]
10. El Dib RP, Silva EM, Morais JF, Trevisani VF. Prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among people working with sound systems and general population in Brazil: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-8-151]
11. Melamed S, Rabinowitz S, Feiner M, Weisberg E, Ribak J. Usefulness of the protection motivation theory in explaining hearing protection device use among male industrial workers. Health Psychol. 1996;15(3):209-15. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/0278-6133.15.3.209]
12. Cismaru M. Using protection motivation theory to increase the persuasiveness of public service communications. Public Policy PAPer. 2006;40:1-31. [Link]
13. Hooman HA. Structural equation modeling with liserl application. 8th Edition. Tehran: SAMT; 2005. [Persian] [Link]
14. Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):499-510. [Link] [DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7]
15. Hassani L, Dehdari T, Hajizadeh E, Shojaeizadeh D, Abedini M, Nedjat S. Development of an instrument based on the protection motivation theory to measure factors influencing women's intention to first pap test practice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(3):1227-32. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1227]
16. Floyd DL, Prentice‐Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(2):407-29. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x]
17. Cox DN, Koster A, Russell CG. Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite. 2004;43(1):55-64. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.003]
18. Milne S, Orbell S, Sheeran P. Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. Br J Health Psychol. 2002;7(2):163-84. [Link] [DOI:10.1348/135910702169420]
19. Khezeli M, Dehdari T. Knowledge, attitude and practice of female employees of health network in Guilan-Gharb county about cervical cancer and pap smear. Prev Care Nurs Midwifery J. 2012;1(2):43-50. [Persian] [Link]
20. Khojasteh F. The study of knowledge, attitude and practice about cervical cancer and pap smear of women that visited Zahedan heal the center clinics. Jundishapur Sci Med J. 2004;(41):1-9. [Persian] [Link]
21. Cheek J, Fuller J, Gilchrist S, Maddock A, Ballantyne A. Vietnamese women and pap smears: Issues in promotion. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(1):72-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01208.x]
22. Karimy M, Gallali M, Niknami S, Aminshokravi F, Tavafian S. The effect of health education program based on Health Belief Model on the performance of pap smear test among women referring to health care centers in Zarandieh. J Jahrom Univ Med Sci. 2012;10(1):53-9. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.29252/jmj.10.1.53]
23. Herath T, Rao HR. Protection motivation and deterrence: A framework for security policy compliance in organisations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(2):106-25. [Link] [DOI:10.1057/ejis.2009.6]
24. Morowati SharifAbad MA, Mohammad Yousefi Vardanjani Z, AskariShahi M. Predictors of pap smear test based on protection motivation theory among women of Shahree-Kord. TOLOO-E-BEHDASHT. 2018;17(4):43-55. [Persian] [Link] [DOI:10.18502/tbj.v17i4.185]
25. Ackerson K, Preston SD. A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(6):1130-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04981.x]
26. Jowzi F, Hashemifard T, Morowatisharifabad M, Bashir Z. Factors associated with pap smear screening test among women aged 15-49 based on protection motivation theory. HAYAT. 2013;19(1);29-40. [Persian] [Link]
27. Agurto I, Bishop A, Sánchez G, Betancourt Z, Robles S. Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med. 2004;39(1):91-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.040]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |