Health Provider Perspectives on Barriers to Prenatal Class Attendance in Iran

Document Type : Qualitative Research

Authors

1 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Health Deputy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

10.58209/hehp.14.2.367
Abstract
Aims: The World Health Organization emphasizes that preparation for childbirth is a key component of antenatal care that reduces maternal mortality and improves birth experiences. Understanding barriers to participation requires resource-based interventions and qualitative inquiry. This study explored health providers’ perspectives on barriers to prenatal class attendance in Iran.
Participants & Methods: This qualitative study included 36 participants who were purposively selected from among class instructors and key informants across 30 health centers from May 2024 to March 2025. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews using an interview guide. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis, following Graneheim and Lundman, with attention to the trustworthiness of the findings.
Findings: After data saturation, the analysis yielded 452 codes, which were organized into 94 sub-sub-themes, 10 sub-themes, 4 themes, and 1 main theme. The main theme, “Navigating a Whirlwind of Challenges,” emerged from four themes: Lack of Accessibility, Lack of Acceptability, Negative Feedback, and Lack of Rethinking to Start Over.
Conclusion: Overcoming barriers to prenatal class attendance requires an accessible, evidence-based, and integrated childbirth education program supported by policy, adequate funding, manageable workloads, and ongoing evaluation to empower pregnant women and improve maternal and neonatal health.

Keywords

Subjects

1- WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: Screening, diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis disease in pregnant women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
2- WHO. Maternal and fetal assessment update: Imaging ultrasound before 24 weeks of pregnancy: WHO antenatal care recommendations for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
3- Tunçalp O, Pena‐Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG. 2017;124(6):860-2.
4- Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gülmezoglu A, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045-9.
5- Whitworth K, Donnellan‐Fernandez R, Fleet JA. Women's experiences of online antenatal education: An integrative literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2024;80(5):1761-75.
6- Whitworth K, Donnellan-Fernandez R, Fleet JA. Digital transformation of antenatal education: A descriptive exploratory study of women’s experiences of online antenatal education. Women Birth. 2024;37(1):188-96.
7- Khalil M, Carasso KB, Kabakian-Khasholian T. Exposing obstetric violence in the eastern Mediterranean region: A review of women's narratives of disrespect and abuse in childbirth. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3:850796.
8- WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
9- Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(5):545-55.
10- Sepanlou SG, Aliabadi HR, Malekzadeh R, Naghavi M, GBD 2019 Iran Maternal Collaborators. Maternal mortality and morbidity by cause in provinces of Iran, 1990 to 2019: An analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Arch Iran Med. 2022;25(9):578-90.
11- Doshmangir L, Bazyar M, Majdzadeh R, Takian A. So near, so far: Four decades of health policy reforms in Iran, achievements and challenges. Arch Iran Med. 2019;22(10):592-605.
12- Abdollahpour S, Heidarian Miri H, Khademol Khamse F, Khadivzadeh T. The relationship between global gender equality with maternal and neonatal health indicators: An ecological study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(6):1093-9.
13- Behzadifar M, Behzadifar M, Bakhtiari A, Azari S, Saki M, Golbabayi F, et al. The effect of the health transformation plan on cesarean section in Iran: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):37.
14- Shafeei M, Khadivzadeh T, Afzal-Aghaei M, Ahmadian M, Abdollahpour S. Updating the Iranian national childbirth preparation classes guideline: A multi-phase mixed-methods protocol study. Reprod Health. 2026;23(1):118.
15- Mengmei Y, Meizhen Z, Tieying Z, Meiliyang W, Ye C, Ke Z, et al. Childbirth Readiness Scale (CRS): Instrument development and psychometric properties. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):257.
16- Moradi-Lakeh M, Vosoogh-Moghaddam A. Health sector evolution plan in Iran; equity and sustainability concerns. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(10):637-40.
17- Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57.
18- Abdollahpour S, Heydari A, Ebrahimipour H, Faridhoseini F, Khadivzadeh T. Death-stricken survivor mother: The lived experience of near miss mothers. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):5.
19- Stapleton H, Murphy R, Correa-Velez I, Steel M, Kildea S. Women from refugee backgrounds and their experiences of attending a specialist antenatal clinic. Narratives from an Australian setting. Women Birth. 2013;26(4):260-6.
20- Heim MA, Miquelutti MA, Makuch MY. Perspective of pregnant women regarding antenatal preparation: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2019;32(6):558-63.
21- Abdollahpour S, Motaghi Z. Lived traumatic childbirth experiences of newly delivered mothers admitted to the postpartum ward: A phenomenological study. J Caring Sci. 2019;8(1):23-31.
22- Lewis-Jones B, Nielsen TC, Svensson J, Nassar N, Henry A, Lainchbury A, et al. Cross-sectional survey of antenatal education attendance among nulliparous pregnant women in Sydney, Australia. Women Birth. 2023;36(2):e276-82.
23- Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753-60.
24- Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-907.
25- Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12.
26- Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 1981;29(2):75-91.
27- Boerleider AW, Wiegers TA, Manniën J, Francke AL, Devillé WLJM. Factors affecting the use of prenatal care by non-western women in industrialized western countries: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):81.
28- Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, Moffatt M, Helewa ME, Morris H, et al. Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: Perceptions of health care providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):2.
29- Lazar J, Boned-Rico L, Olander EK, McCourt C. A systematic review of providers’ experiences of facilitating group antenatal care. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):180.
30- Nolan ML. Information giving and education in pregnancy: A review of qualitative studies. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(4):21-30.
31- Alizadeh-Dibazari Z, Abbasalizadeh F, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Jahanfar S, Mirghafourvand M. Childbirth preparation and its facilitating and inhibiting factors from the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum women in Tabriz-Iran: A qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):106.
32- Wallace HJ, Bayes S, Davenport C, Grant M. How should online antenatal and parenting education be structured according to parents? Qualitative findings from a mixed-methods retrospective study. Womens Health. 2023;19:17455057221150098.
33- Udenigwe O, Okonofua FE, Ntoimo LF, Imongan W, Igboin B, Yaya S. Perspectives of policymakers and health providers on barriers and facilitators to skilled pregnancy care: Findings from a qualitative study in rural Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):20.
34- Abdollahpour S, Heydari A, Ebrahimipour H, Faridhoseini F, Khadivzadeh T. Mothering sweetness mixed with the bitterness of death: The lived mothering experience of near-miss mothers. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2022;43(2):128-35.
35- McDonald SD, Sword W, Eryuzlu LE, Biringer AB. A qualitative descriptive study of the group prenatal care experience: Perceptions of women with low-risk pregnancies and their midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:334.
36- McNeil DA, Vekved M, Dolan SM, Siever J, Horn S, Tough SC. Getting more than they realized they needed: A qualitative study of women's experience of group prenatal care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:17.