The Roles of Health Literacy in Influencing the Internet Users' Electronic Word of Mouth: A Socio-Demographic Comparative Study

Document Type : Descriptive & Survey

Author
Abstract
Introduction: People nowadays are casually communicating, preferring the electronic approach basis rather than the conventional one. As a matter of fact, the post Covid-19 has witnessed more people becoming more health conscious, nurturing their protective nature by sharing various types of health information online, beyond the definition of acquaintances. Therefore, this research was conducted to investigate the impacts of health literacy towards electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) among Malaysia internet users in disseminating health information, based on the socio-demographic comparisons.

Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study involved 400 respondents, with proportionate quota sampling as the sampling technique. 100 samples were approached from each region of Peninsular Malaysia (Central, Southern, Northern and East Coast), who were then given a self-administered questionnaire with 56 items to be filled. This instrument was adapted from a well-established e-WOM questionnaire and New Short-Form Health Literacy Instrument (HLS-SF12).

Findings: The results of multiple regression analyses have shown that the three domains of health literacy have better explained e-WOM (highest R2 values) among respondents who were male, 41 to 50 years old, with secondary education and self-employed. Nonetheless, more significant influences of health literacy domains towards the dependent variable found among the respondents who were female, 18-30 years old, with bachelor’s degree and currently were not working.

Conclusion: There were contradictory results in comparison to the previous studies which were justifiable, since the settings and respondents were not the same. Meanwhile, the government should play its role in shifting society's e-WOM to a positive transmission communication process.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. 1. De Angelis L, Baglivo F, Arzilli G, Privitera GP, Ferragina P, Tozzi AE, et al. ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;Volume 11:1-8.
    2. Kaňková J, Binder A, Matthes J. Helpful or harmful? Navigating the impact of social media influencers’ health advice: insights from health expert content creators. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3511.
    3. Nie X, Li Y, Li C, Wu J, Li L. The Association Between Health Literacy and Self-rated Health Among Residents of China Aged 15-69 Years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;60(4):569-78.
    4. Lee HY, Jin SW, Henning-Smith C, Lee J, Lee J. Role of Health Literacy in Health-Related Information-Seeking Behavior Online: Cross-sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e14088.
    5. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC public health. 2012;12(1):1-13.
    6. Allen-Meares P, Lowry B, Estrella ML, Mansuri S. Health Literacy Barriers in the Health Care System: Barriers and Opportunities for the Profession. Health Soc Work. 2020;45(1):62-4.
    7. Santos P, Sá L, Couto L, Hespanhol A. Health literacy as a key for effective preventive medicine. Cogent Social Sciences. 2017;3:1-9.
    8. Kim HM, J. SA, Wenlin L, Jingyi S, Yiqi L, Lichen Z, et al. How Public Health Agencies Break through COVID-19 Conversations: A Strategic Network Approach to Public Engagement. Health Communication. 2022;37(10):1276-84.
    9. Chen J, Wang Y. Social Media Use for Health Purposes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e17917.
    10. Ramachandran M, Brinton C, Wiljer D, Upshur R, Gray CS. The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24(1):228.
    11. Luo MM, Chien C-C, editors. Factors Affecting Negative E-WOM: A Literature Review and Merged Model. 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; HICSS '21; 2021; Kauai, HI.
    12. Azlan AA, Hamzah MR, Tham JS, Ayub SH, Ahmad AL, Mohamad E. Associations between Health Literacy and Sociodemographic Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Malaysia Utilising the HLS-M-Q18. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(9).
    13. Dušan Mc, Visar R, Sebastian M, Prateek K, Rahul C. Effects of Sociodemographic Variables on Electronic Word of Mouth: Evidence from Emerging Economies. Masaryk University; 2022.
    14. Bornstein MH, Jager J, Putnick DL. Sampling in Developmental Science: Situations, Shortcomings, Solutions, and Standards. Dev Rev. 2013;33(4):357-70.
    15. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning; 2018.
    16. Wan Zulkiffli WF, Lu MH, Ramlee SIF, Mat Yunoh MN, Che Aziz R. The Effectiveness of Electronic Word-Of-Mouth (eWOM) on Consumer Purchase Intention Among Generation-Y. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business. 2017;2(6):18-26.
    17. Duong TV, Aringazina A, Baisunova G, Pham TV, Pham KM, Truong TQ, et al. Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries. Journal of epidemiology. 2017;27(2):80-6.
    18. Konting MM, Kamaruddin NB, Man NA. Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions: Exist Survey among Universiti Putra Malaysia Graduating Students. International Education Studies. 2009;2(1):25-31.
    19. Malaysia Department of Statistics. ICT USE AND ACCESS BY INDIVIDUALS AND HOUSEHOLDS SURVEY REPORT 2023. Putrajaya: Department of Statistics, Malaysia 2024.
    20. Bidmon S, Terlutter R. Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6):e156.
    21. Otterbring T, Festila A. Pandemic prevention and personality psychology: Gender differences in preventive health behaviors during COVID-19 and the roles of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience. 2022;3(1):87-91.
    22. Oliffe JL, Rossnagel E, Kelly MT, Bottorff JL, Seaton C, Darroch F. Men’s health literacy: a review and recommendations. Health Promotion International. 2019;35(5):1037-51.
    23. Milner A, Shields M, King T. The Influence of Masculine Norms and Mental Health on Health Literacy Among Men: Evidence From the Ten to Men Study. American Journal of Men's Health. 2019;13(5):1557988319873532.
    24. Kwon DH, Kwon YD. Patterns of health literacy and influencing factors differ by age: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1556.
    25. Stassen G, Grieben C, Hottenrott N, Rudolf K, Froböse I, Schaller A. Associations between health-related skills and young adults’ work ability within a structural health literacy model. Health Promotion International. 2020;36(4):1072-83.
    26. García-García D, Pérez-Rivas FJ. Health Literacy and Its Sociodemographic Predictors: A Cross-Sectional Study of a Population in Madrid (Spain). International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(18).
    27. Taheri A, Langarizadeh M, Dehkordi JG, Yousefianzadeh O. Development of health literacy among postgraduate students: From information literacy perspective. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2020;9:338.
    28. Jaafar N, Perialathan K, Krishnan M, Juatan N, Ahmad M, Mien TYS, et al. Malaysian Health Literacy: Scorecard Performance from a National Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(11):5813.
    29. Mohamed Yusof SA, Tengku Ismail TA, Musa KI, Kamaruzzaman H. Factors influencing health-promoting behavior among single mothers in Northeastern Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. PeerJ. 2024;12:e18359.
    30. Xiong Z, Zhang L, Li Z, Xu W, Zhang Y, Ye T. Frequency of Online Health Information Seeking and Types of Information Sought Among the General Chinese Population: Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(12):e30855.
    31. Filomena M, Picchio M. You'll never walk alone: Unemployment, social networks and leisure activities. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics; 2023.
    32. Tefft N, Kageleiry A. State-Level Unemployment and the Utilization of Preventive Medical Services. Health Services Research. 2014;49(1):186-205.
    33. Mohammad AAS, Alolayyan MN, Al- Daoud KI, Nammas YMA, Vasudevan A, Mohammad SI. Association between Social Demographic Factors and Health Literacy in Jordan. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024;3(7):2351–65.
    34. Lim CK, Zainol Z, Omar B, Ibrahim NF. COVID-19 Infodemic in Malaysia: Conceptualizing Fake News for Detection. Advances in Multimedia. 2023;2023(1):9629700.
    35. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. Sebenarnya.my: Tidak pasti jangan kongsi: Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission; 2023 [Available from: https://sebenarnya.my/.
    36. Jamei Z, Hosseini F, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Morshedi H. Health Literacy and the Health Action Process Approach in Predicting Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors. Health Education and Health Promotion. 2025;13(2):227-33.
    37. Ministry of Health Malaysia. National Health Literacy Policy. Putrajaya: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2024.
    38. Trivedi N, Lowry M, Gaysynsky A, Chou W-YS. Factors Associated with Cancer Message Believability: a Mixed Methods Study on Simulated Facebook Posts. Journal of Cancer Education. 2022;37(6):1870-8.