Volume 6, Issue 3 (2018)
Health Educ Health Promot 2018, 6(3): 97-102 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Tropical & Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , f.balali@yahoo.com
2- Health Research Center, Futures Studies in Health Institute, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- Petroleum Engineering, Department, Chemical Engineering & Analytical Science Faculty, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
2- Health Research Center, Futures Studies in Health Institute, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- Petroleum Engineering, Department, Chemical Engineering & Analytical Science Faculty, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
Abstract: (6104 Views)
Aims: Considering the evolution of schools and the growth of smart schools, the aim of the present study was to compare the self-efficacy and academic performance of students in conventional and smart schools.
Instruments and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was conducted in Kerman, Iran, in 2015. 300 students of 8th grade studying in Kerman (145 smart school student and 155 conventional school students) were selected by multi-stage sampling method. Data were collected by a standardized academic self-efficacy questionnaire of Jinks-Morgan and analyzed using independent t-test, linear regression, Pearson correlation test and SPSS 20 software.
Findings: Academic achievement in conventional and smart schools was statistically different. So that students of smart schools had better academic achievement than ordinary schools (p=0.0001). While the self-efficacy of the two groups did not differ significantly. There was a significant direct correlation between students' academic achievement and their self-efficacy score (r=0.159, p=0.006). Also, there was a significant statistical difference, according to the type of school, occupation, and education level of parents (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: The academic self-efficacy of students in the two groups do not differ, students of smart schools have the higher academic achievement. School smartness and high self-efficacy will improve students' academic achievement.
Instruments and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was conducted in Kerman, Iran, in 2015. 300 students of 8th grade studying in Kerman (145 smart school student and 155 conventional school students) were selected by multi-stage sampling method. Data were collected by a standardized academic self-efficacy questionnaire of Jinks-Morgan and analyzed using independent t-test, linear regression, Pearson correlation test and SPSS 20 software.
Findings: Academic achievement in conventional and smart schools was statistically different. So that students of smart schools had better academic achievement than ordinary schools (p=0.0001). While the self-efficacy of the two groups did not differ significantly. There was a significant direct correlation between students' academic achievement and their self-efficacy score (r=0.159, p=0.006). Also, there was a significant statistical difference, according to the type of school, occupation, and education level of parents (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: The academic self-efficacy of students in the two groups do not differ, students of smart schools have the higher academic achievement. School smartness and high self-efficacy will improve students' academic achievement.
Article Type: Original Article |
Subject:
Health Communication
Received: 2017/08/20 | Accepted: 2018/01/2 | Published: 2018/09/9
Received: 2017/08/20 | Accepted: 2018/01/2 | Published: 2018/09/9
References
1. Hakimzadeh R, Aboalghasemi Najaf Abadi M, Nejati F. Comparing school connectedness, academic motivation and academic achievement between smart school students and traditional school students in Esfahan. J Educ. 2012;19(1):151-70. [Persian] [Link]
2. Mohajeran B, Ghaleei AR, Hamzeh Robati M. The main reasons for the lack of correct formation of smart schools in Mazandaran province and presenting solutions for their development (from the viewpoints of ICT experts). Media. 2013;4(2):13-23. [Persian] [Link]
3. Zamani BE, Ghassab Pour B, Jabal Ameli J. A study on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Iranian smart schools. J Educ Innov. 2011;9(36):79-100. [Persian] [Link]
4. Mahmoodi J, Nalchiger S, Ebrahimi SB, Sadeghi Moghadam MR. The survey of the development challenges smart schools. J Educ Innov. 2008;7(27):61-78. [Persian] [Link]
5. Afzalkhani M, Ghods S. Assessment of smart middle schools establishment in Semnan province from the administrators and teachers view. Inf Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2011;2(1):23-39. [Persian] [Link]
6. Zeainali Pour H, Zarei E, Zandiniya Z. Study of general and academic self-efficacy of students and its relationship with academic achievement. J Educ Psychol Stud. 2009;6(9):13-28. [Persian] [Link]
7. MirSharafalDin AR, Hosseini M. The relationship between personality characteristics and academic self-efficacy. J Hum Sci Res. 2017;3(18):57-68. [Persian] [Link]
8. Muris P. A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2001;23(3):145-9.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016054532275 [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1010961119608]
9. Dehghanizadeh MH, Hossein Chari M. Educational vitality and perception of family communication model, self-efficacy mediator role. Educ Learn Stud. 2012;4(2):21-47. [Persian] [Link]
10. Ong ET, Ruthven K. The effectiveness of smart schooling on students' attitudes towards science. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2009;5(1):35-45. [Link] [DOI:10.12973/ejmste/75255]
11. Barrow L, Markman L, Rouse CE. Technology's edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2009;1(1):52-74. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/pol.1.1.52]
12. Zidan AA, Ismail I, Spain R, Kumutha K. The effects of ICT use in teaching and learning on students' achievement in science subject in a primary school in Malaysia. Malays J Distance Educ. 2011;13(2):19-32. [Link]
13. Deryakulu D, Büyüköztürk Ş, Özçınar H. Predictors of academic achievement of student ICT teachers with different learning styles. Int Sch Sci Res Innov. 2009;3(10):1951-7. [Link]
14. Hamzah MI, Embi MA, Ismail A. ICT and diversity in learners' attitude on smart school initiative. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;7:728-37. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099]
15. Jia J, Chan Y, Ding Z, Bai Y, Yang B, Li M, et al. Effects of an intelligent web-based English instruction system on students' academic performance. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29(6):556-68. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jcal.12016]
16. Ghanaatpishe M, Salehi M. Compare social and self-learning skills between traditional and smart schools in high school students. Q New Appr Edu Manag. 2018;9(33):73-88. [Persian] [Link]
17. Tsai CC, Chuang SC, Liang JC, Tsai MJ. Self-efficacy in Internet-based learning environments: A literature review. Educ Technol Soc. 2011;14(4):222-40. [Link]
18. Najafi H. The impact of Information Technology (IT) on the academic achievements of high school students of Ardebil city (2005-2006). Peyke Noor J. 2008;6(3):82-93. [Persian] [Link]
19. Soleymanpoor J, Khalkhali A, Raayat Konande Fallah L. The effect of ICT- based teaching methods in creating sustained learning in experimental science course in third grade secondary school students. Inf Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2011;1(2):77-94. [Persian] [Link]
20. Daeizadeh H, Hosseizadeh B, Ghaznavi MR. Investigating of the role of ICT on academic performance of high school students. Q J Educ Leadersh Adm. 2010;4(4):81-97. [Persian] [Link]
21. Hosseinpoor L, Allahvirdiyani K, Motallebi Nejad AR, Momeni Rad A, Mohammdjami H. Comparing educational self-concept & the rate of learning in the students of normal and smart high schools in Tehran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:3002-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.231]
22. Heidari M, Vaziri M, Adli F. A survey of the status of smart schools based on standards and comparison of its students academic performance and critical thinking with public schools. Inf Commun Technol Educ Sci. 2014;4(2):149-73. [Persian] [Link]
23. Dortaj F, Lakpour E, Bohlooli A. Evaluation of impact of smart schools on academic achievement of high school's student in Lorestan province. J Technol Educ. 2013;8(2):133-41. [Persian] [Link]
24. Jinks J, Morgan V. Children's perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventory scale. Clear House J Educ Strateg Issues Ideas. 1999;72(4):224-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00098659909599398]
25. Karimzadeh M, Mohseni N . Investigating of the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic achievement in second grade high school girl students in Tehran (trends of mathematical and human sciences). Womens Stud Sociol Psychol. 2006;4(2):29-45. [Persian] [Link]
26. Esmaeil Pour M, Shookoor Z, Naderi Far V. Investigation of measure of decrease and increase of academic achievement when establish smart schools. 5th National Conference and 2nd International Conference on Learning and electronics education. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology; 2009. [Link]
27. Vasefian F, Naghsh S. Compare Self regulated larning and achievement of students of tradition and smart school and compare relationship between two variables. J Curr Res. 2014;4(1):103-16. [Persian] [Link]
28. Hammond M. Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. Br J Educ Technol. 2014;45(2):191-201. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12033]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |