Volume 10, Issue 1 (2022)
Health Educ Health Promot 2022, 10(1): 69-74 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Setyanti Kusumaputri E, Apriliawati D, Latif Muslimah H, Sumintono B. Satisfaction of Indonesian Health Promotion and Academic Services in Higher Education. Health Educ Health Promot 2022; 10 (1) :69-74
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-57270-en.html
URL: http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-57270-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2- Department of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3- Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiay
2- Department of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University, Sleman Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3- Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiay
Abstract: (1570 Views)
and health promotion. This study aimed at how universities consider student satisfaction with academic services and health promotion.
Instrument & Methods: This research uses a descriptive method. This research was conducted in six state Islamic universities in Indonesia and involved 315 students. Research data collection using a questionnaire. The variables in the study include lectures, counseling, health issues, additional services, hidden services, explicit services, and social atmosphere. This study uses Rasch analysis to measure variables with the help of WINSTEPS 3.73 in determining validity and reliability. The RASH model is used in this study to verify the measurement of service quality variables. Rash's model only focuses on student perceptions and gains satisfaction with the dimensions of academic service and health promotion.
Findings: The results showed student satisfaction based on demographic characteristics that state Islamic universities were more dissatisfied than university-type Islamic colleges.
Conclusion: Academic services to students need to be considered to increase student satisfaction.
Instrument & Methods: This research uses a descriptive method. This research was conducted in six state Islamic universities in Indonesia and involved 315 students. Research data collection using a questionnaire. The variables in the study include lectures, counseling, health issues, additional services, hidden services, explicit services, and social atmosphere. This study uses Rasch analysis to measure variables with the help of WINSTEPS 3.73 in determining validity and reliability. The RASH model is used in this study to verify the measurement of service quality variables. Rash's model only focuses on student perceptions and gains satisfaction with the dimensions of academic service and health promotion.
Findings: The results showed student satisfaction based on demographic characteristics that state Islamic universities were more dissatisfied than university-type Islamic colleges.
Conclusion: Academic services to students need to be considered to increase student satisfaction.
Article Type: Descriptive & Survey |
Subject:
Health Media
Received: 2021/11/20 | Accepted: 2021/12/16 | Published: 2022/02/10
Received: 2021/11/20 | Accepted: 2021/12/16 | Published: 2022/02/10
References
1. Wang Y, Shi Y. Measuring the service quality of urban rail transit based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy model. KSCE J Civil Eng. 2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12205-019-0937-x]
2. Butt S. Service quality assessment and student satisfaction in business schools: Mediating role of perceived value. Malays Online J Educ Manag. 2021;9(1). [Link]
3. Kim J, Kim M. Conceptualization and assessment of E-service quality for luxury brands. Serv Indust J. 2018;40(5-6):436-70. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02642069.2018.1517755]
4. Kardoyo, Pitaloka LK, Rozman, Hapsoro BB. Analyzing universities service quality to student satisfaction; academic and non-academic analyses. Int J Higher Educ. 2020;9(1):126-32. [Link] [DOI:10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p126]
5. Arizzi G, Breitenreiter J, Khalsa R, Iyer R, Babin LA, Griffin M. Modeling business student satisfaction : utilitarian value and hedonic value as drivers of satisfaction modeling business student satisfaction : utilitarian value and hedonic value as drivers of satisfaction. Marketing Educ Rev. 2020;30(4):196-207. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/10528008.2020.1822186]
6. Geier MT. Students' expectations and students' satisfaction: the mediating role of excellent teacher behaviors. Teach Psychol. 2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0098628320959923]
7. Śledzińska-Simon A. Populists, gender, and national identity. Int J Const Law. 2020;18(2):447-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/icon/moaa047]
8. Luo Y, Xie M, Lian Z. Emotional engagement and student satisfaction : a study of chinese college students based on a nationally representative. Asia Pac Educ Res. 2019;28:283-92. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s40299-019-00437-5]
9. Sun H, Rabbani MR, Ahmad N, Sial MS, Guping C, Zia-Ud-din M, Fu Q. CSR, co-creation and green consumer loyalty: are green banking initiatives important? a moderated mediation approach from an emerging economy. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12(24):10688. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su122410688]
10. Suradi NRM, Kahar S, Aziz AA, Jamaludin NAA. Construct validation for academic application in higher education institution (HEI) with RASCH model. Int J Adv Trends Comput Sci Eng. 2020;160-66. [Link] [DOI:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/24912020]
11. Mohamed A, Abdullah Z, Razak AZA. Validation of an instrument for measuring integrated principal leadership practices. Malays Online J Educ Manag. 2021;9(1). [Link]
12. Mandhani J, Nayak JK, Parida M. Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System : An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach. Transport Res Part A. 2020;140:320-36. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2020.08.014]
13. Heng Y, Yao A, Locke EA, Jamal M. On a combined theory of pay level satisfaction. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(4):448-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/job.2243]
14. Hong S, Choi D, Chae J. Exploring different airport users' service quality satisfaction between service providers and air travelers. J Retail Consum Serv. 2020;52:101917. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101917]
15. Slack NJ. The effect of service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty and the mediating role of customer satisfaction Supermarkets in Fiji. TQM J. 2020;32(3):543-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1108/TQM-07-2019-0187]
16. Appau S, Churchill SA, Farrell L. Social integration and subjective wellbeing. Appl Econ. 2019;51(16):1748-61. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/00036846.2018.1528340]
17. Finell E, Tolvanen A, Haverinen-shaughnessy U, Laaksonen S, Karvonen S, Sund R, et al. Science of the Total Environment Indoor air problems and the perceived social climate in schools: A multilevel structural equation analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2018;624:1504-12. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.126] [PMID]
18. Yusoff SM, Tengku-Ariffin TF. Looking after teacher wellbeing: does teacher empowerment matter?. Malays Online J Educ Manag. 2020;8:4. [Link] [DOI:10.22452/mojem.vol8no4.3]
19. Leipoldt JD, Harder AT, Kayed NS, Grietens H. Children and youth services review determinants and outcomes of social climate in therapeutic residential youth care: a systematic review. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;99:429-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.010]
20. Robinson J, Craig LA, Tonkin M. Perceptions of social climate and aggressive behavior in forensic services: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018;19(4):391-405. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1524838016663936] [PMID]
21. Kumar A, Meena NK, Bansal RC, Kumar P. Strategic integration of battery energy storage systems with the provision of distributed ancillary services in active distribution systems. Appl Energy. 2019;253:113503. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113503]
22. Wang H, Wang S, Tang R. Development of grid-responsive buildings: Opportunities, challenges, capabilities and applications of HVAC systems in non-residential buildings in providing ancillary services by fast demand responses to smart grids. Appl Energy. 2019;250:697-712. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.159]
23. Cui Y, Duenyas I, Sahin O. Manufacturing & service operations management unbundling of ancillary service: how does price discrimination of main service matter?. Manuf ServOperat Manag. 2018;20. [Link] [DOI:10.1287/msom.2017.0646]
24. Wijngaards-de Meij L, Merx S. Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible. Int J Acad Dev. 2018;23(3):219-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1360144X.2018.1462187]
25. Parsazadeh N, Ali R, Rezaei M. Computers & Education A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evaluation skills. Comput Educ. 2018;120:75-89. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.010]
26. Singh S, Jasial SS. Moderating effect of perceived trust on service quality - student satisfaction relationship: evidence from Indian higher management education institutions. J Market High Educ. 2021;31(2):280-304. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/08841241.2020.1825029]
27. Lin L, Huang Z, Othman B, Luo Y. Let's make it better: An updated model interpreting international student satisfaction in China based on PLS-SEM approach. PLOS ONE. 2020. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242583] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Bennett J, Shuker R. Hope, harmony and humanity: creating a positive social climate in a democratic therapeutic community prison and the implications for penal practice. J Crim Psychol. 2017;8(4). [Link] [DOI:10.1108/JCP-06-2017-0030]
29. Bell N, Tonkin M, Chester V, Craig L. Adapting measures of social climate for use with individuals with intellectual developmental disability in forensic settings. Psychol, Crim Law. 2018;24(4):362-78. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1298761]
30. Gupta GR, Oomman N, Grown C, Conn K, Hawkes S, Shawar YR, et al. Gender equality and gender norms: framing the opportunities for health. Lancet. 2019;393(10190):2550-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30651-8]
31. Miotto G, Polo Lopez M, Rom Rodríguez J. Gender equality and UN sustainable development goals: priorities and correlations in the top business schools ' communication and legitimation strategies. Sustainability. 2019;11(2):302. [Link] [DOI:10.3390/su11020302]
32. Brown GR, Alexandersen K. Gender equality and gender gaps in mathematics performance. Trends Cognit Sci. 2020;24(8):591-3. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.002] [PMID]
33. Mumtaz MZ, Smith ZA. The behavior of household finance on demographic characteristics in Pakistan. Econ Res Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2021;34(1):1409-27. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/1331677X.2020.1825107]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |